CNN's Jake Tapper Asks Seismologist If Climate Change Is Making Earthquakes Stronger

Posted • December 6, 2024: The people who have been lecturing the Right about "science" for the last several years have struck again. We've seen Democrat Rep. Hank Johnson ask an, er, interesting question about Guam: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5dkqUy7mUk -- That was the official start of the "age of Democrat science," and since then the media has joined the party. Remember when Don Lemon, then with CNN, asked this question about the disappearance of the Malaysian Airlines flight in 2014? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZpVd7k1Uw6A -- The "science" questions on CNN continued yesterday after there was an earthquake off the coast of California that caused a tsunami warning for the west coast that was later canceled. Dems and the media are often mocked with some variation of the response, "there's nothing climate change can't do," because it's provided as an excuse for everything.

CNN's Jake Tapper tried to forward the climate change propagandists' narrative with this question for a seismologist. Jake Tapper wonders if Climate Change is making earthquakes stronger. A seismologist has to tell him there's no evidence of that. "That's a good question." A GOOD QUESTION? Really? “Well, that’s a good question…”. 🤦‍♂️ The seismologist is an idiot for saying it’s a really good question. No, it’s not. It’s a stupid question and anyone who asks it should be mocked relentlessly for suggesting that climate has anything to do with the movement of the Earth’s mantel. They should both be mocked. Many years ago, I used to joke that soon the media would be trying to blame earthquakes on climate change, and now they're actually trying to do it. But there is strong evidence that Climate Change is making journalists dumber by the day. It is an existential threat to journalists’s IQ, meager as it was to begin with.

It won't be long until they're worrying that climate change will cause Guam to capsize. Tapper's on the side that likes to mock the Right for being "anti-science," which is a badge of honor considering the source.