Nigel Cooper Destroys Physics & the MIC under one hour

Nigel Cooper Destroys Physics, Gravity, Newton, Einstein, Government taxation, Military Industrial Complex (MIC), Big Pharma and more in just under one hour

He talks about a 210 QUADRILLION dollar wasted expense of the False Energy industry... instead of using ZPE (real COLD FUSION)

AI (Brave Leo) summary:

" Nigel Cooper, also known as “N.C. Hands,” presents a video titled “Brave Scientist (Nigel Cooper) Destroys Physics, Gravity, Newton, Einstein, And More All At Once.” The video claims to challenge fundamental concepts in physics, including gravity, Newton’s laws, and Einstein’s theory of relativity.

Key Points
Paradoxes and Insulting Other Thinkers: Critics argue that Nigel Cooper’s approach relies heavily on repeating paradoxes, which have been discussed by philosophers and scientists throughout history. Additionally, his video is criticized for containing insults towards other thinkers, a tactic used to dismiss their ideas rather than engage in constructive debate.
Lack of Original Contribution: The video does not appear to present new, groundbreaking research or insights. Instead, it seems to rehash existing paradoxes and criticisms of established scientific theories.
Misconceptions and Misrepresentations: Some critics argue that Nigel Cooper misrepresents or misinterprets scientific concepts, such as magnetism and spacetime. For example, he claims that a magnet is not moving when, in fact, it is moving through spacetime at the same speed as the observer.
Promotion of Alternative Theories: The video may be promoting alternative theories or perspectives that are not widely accepted within the scientific community.
Conclusion
While Nigel Cooper’s video may generate interest and debate, its claims and arguments are largely based on repeating paradoxes and criticizing established scientific theories without providing new, substantial evidence or insights. The video’s approach is criticized for being more focused on insulting other thinkers than engaging in constructive scientific discourse. As such, it is essential to approach the video with a critical eye and consider the perspectives of the scientific community before accepting or rejecting its claims."