Attorneys AT Law vs In Law

They myth of the "attorney at law"....

If you're currently paying a member of the BAR, as in agent of the state, can they recite the significance of the SEC v Jarkesy and the Chevron Deference?

Cuz @VivekGRamaswamy is posting about it.

Vivek, please have a conversation with us about how to restore the Republic and the significance of the Summer of SCOTUS 2024.

Everyone is chatting about the "double standard" and "two -tier justice system" but do you really know what you're upset about?

It's not like TV, "Law and Order", "LA Law", etc. 🤣

The terminology of Article I courts vs Article III courts comes from the Constitution.

Hale v Henkel the Constitution must be interpreted in light of the law as it existed at the time it was adopted.

Judge Gorsuch issued a scathing Supreme Court ruing in the SEC v Jarkesy, that the British attempted to evade American cries by siphoning adjudication to jury-less admiralty, vice admiralty, and chancery courts.

Simmons v United States the state cannot convert a right into a privilege, charge a license fee for it and criminals the actions of anyone who doesn’t acquire the license.

Driver’s license
Marriage
All license requirements from the state are unlawful

The Supreme Court in Jarkesy reaffirmed that actions involving private rights, such as common-law fraud, must be heard by an Article III court: "Congress cannot 'conjure away the Seventh Amendment by mandating that traditional legal claims be... taken to an administrative tribunal." SEC v. Jarkesy, 603 U.S. (2024)

Inside the Inalienable University, you can mingle with real people REALLY standing for their rights and having victories.

Check out Mary who beat the state of Colorado's claim that she owed $8,000.

Standing can and DOES happen when you know what you're doing like we do

All that Scott and I teach came from trial and error of actually standing and winning.

The reason people think I'm without empathy and snooty is because my confidence is unwavering because I don't speculate what I speak about.

I lived it.
Scott has lived it.

If people knew what we have both been through to reach this level of common law knowledge, and dare say that we are to provide civics knowledge for free are the very people who sit on their bums and hold the TV remote.

We've both been in jail.
Jail lights a fire under your ass.

Who would you rather learn from?

A dopey Harvard attorney who joined the BAR and only knows statutory codes and the rules of civil procedure which has nothing to do with your rights?

Or people who learned how to win via the common law and succeeded?

D. Trump is doing his part.
You have a part in the restoration of the Republic as well.

When we all stand they fall.
Will you be part of the problem or part of the solution?

Follow me to freedom!
Join https://Inalienable.University