Nuclear Power Plants, Nuclear Bombs, Nuclear Industry Censorship, Compartmentalization, lies Secrecy

BOOK LINK   https://amzn.to/3APNw9OMy book, 'Nuclear Extinction Event Is Killing Our Families: From Manhattan to Meltdown: Exposing the Radioactive Legacy, 'delves into the radioactive legacy left by the Manhattan Project and its impact on public health. BOOK LINK  https://amzn.to/3APNw9O
The Manhattan Project, a secret U.S. World War II program, developed atomic bombs using over 130,000 workers across multiple sites. It resulted in the bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945, causing Japan's surrender and ending World War II. The bombings killed over 200,000 people by 1945's end, with survivors facing long-term health effects. Nuclear Incidents and Censorship
Nuclear incidents often involve information control and censorship. For example, in Fukushima Daiichi (2011), the Japanese government monitored online reports and social media, while TEPCO delayed disclosing reactor meltdowns.
Kursk Submarine (2000): Russian authorities tightly controlled information, restricting media access and editing official broadcasts.
Mayak Facility (2017): Russian authorities initially denied the release of ruthenium-106 detected across Europe.
Nuclear Industry Influence
The nuclear industry's influence extends to media, policy, and research: Opposition to nuclear power faces systematic censorship.
The actual cost of nuclear power and long-term environmental impacts are often minimized.
Government subsidies and limited liability support the industry's economic viability.
Ongoing Challenges
Nuclear technology presents several ongoing challenges: Waste Management: Safe, long-term solutions for nuclear waste storage still need to be discovered.
Proliferation Concerns: The dual-use nature of nuclear technology complicates international relations.
Health Effects: Long-term health impacts of nuclear accidents should be studied more due to funding constraints and data access issues.
The nuclear industry's influence and censorship practices continue to shape public perception and policy decisions regarding atomic energy and its consequences.