Public Notice: US DISTRICT COURT OF DELAWARE AND DELAWARE HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO ADJUDICATE

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE

NOVEMBER 12, 2024

CASE 1:24-CV-00792-JLH

[Sui Juris Petitioner, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard]
Vs.
[In their individual capacity, Judge, Gregory B. Williams, et al],

NOVEMBER 12, 2024
PUBLIC NOTICE

CGS 54-170 ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT

THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF DELAWARE AND THE STATE OF DELAWARE HAVE NO AUTHORITY TO ADJUDICATE AS THEY ARE “AT WAR WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION” AND “ENGAGES IN ACTS OF TREASON”. THE COMPLICIT COURT IS AN “ENEMY” OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ENGAGED IN “DOMESTIC TERRORISM”, “RACKETEERING”, “TREASON” AND MORE.
The Constitution is harmed by subverting its authority as the foundational law of the land. A domestic enemy is any American who either promotes foreign invasion or attacks the Bill of Rights. The former assaults national stability. The latter assaults individual freedoms.

As a living-breathing American Man, one of “We the People”, the Fourth Branch of Our Government, I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, have authority to address any felony that I witness firsthand.
“Inalienable Rights” and Authority
The U.S. Constitution recognized that certain universal rights cannot be taken away by legislation, as they are beyond the control of a government, being naturally given to every individual at birth, and that these rights are retained throughout life.

Supreme Court Case Law:

Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).

Summary

The United States District Court for the District of Delaware is an “ENEMY” (Title 50 USC 2204) of the United States and “We the People” engaged in “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” (Title 18 USC 2331).

The Denial of his Oath to the U.S. Constitution by Judge Gregory B. Williams in the November 29, 2023 CASE 1:23-CV-01360-GBW is Treason.

The Administrative Delay/Default of the July 8, 2024 Writ of Habeas Corpus CASE 1:24-CV-00792-JLH in the court of Judge Jennifer L. Hall is Misprision of Treason.

The consent judgment of January 30, 2023, in CASE 1:20-CV-01680-MN in which the Democratic Delaware Gov. John Carney agreed that the requirement in Delaware’s state constitution violates the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment proves the complicit behavior of the Judiciary (“DOMESTIC TERRORISM”, “RACKETEERING”).

Please note: the consent decree did not disturb another requirement for political balance on the state’s top three courts.

U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika of the District of Delaware signed the consent judgment willfully ignoring that the State of Delaware top three courts violate the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment too. This is a Misprision of Felony and/or Treason.

The Supreme Law of the United States of America states unambiguously, “The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government and shall protect each of them against Invasion.” Art 4, Sec 4, U S Constitution.

LIBERTY:

In Meyer v. State of Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390 (1923),
“While this court has not attempted to define with exactness the liberty thus guaranteed, the term has received much consideration and some of the included things have been definitely stated. Without doubt, it denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to marry, establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience, and generally to enjoy those privileges long recognized at common law as essential to the orderly pursuit of happiness by free men.”

The obvious and most basic violations of Human and Constitutional Rights result in extraordinary irreparable harm to so many.