TRUMP’s QUESTIONABLE PICKS SEEM MORE LIKE STRATEGIC CHESS MOVES THAN FINAL DECISIONS

In the realm of politics, where perception often outweighs reality, Donald Trump’s recent choices for key government positions have ignited debate. Are they missteps, as critics argue, or are they calculated moves in a larger, more intricate game? Viewed through the lens of Machiavelli, one might suggest that Trump’s questionable picks are not final decisions but strategic chess moves designed to deceive adversaries, consolidate power, and achieve long-term goals.