Premium Only Content
Uninformed Low IQ Liberal Senator Goes Full Retard on 2A
Democrat Senator claims Supreme Court created ability to own guns in 2008. During a Senate Judiciary Committee Bump Stock hearing on Wednesday, Sen. Mazie Hirono began her Anti-Gun speech by complaining that the country was flooded with guns.
Next, get this!! She states, “Meanwhile, the Supreme Court in various decisions, Heller was pretty much an astounding decision to me when suddenly, an individual could [under] the Second Amendment, individuals could own firearms.”
She then jumped to the Bruen (2022) decision, and was shocked that, "Suddenly, we’re supposed to look to what the Founding Fathers thought about in…1791 or some astounding time-frame such as that.'"
I'm guessing she has no idea when the Constitution was written or ratified.
I mean, what does she think "keep and bear" or shall not be infringed means?
Can someone explain to me how a government official in a country with a Second Amendment finds it ‘astounding’ that our Supreme Court ruled individuals have a right to own firearms?
Are we really surprised by this? Did they think the Second Amendment was just a punchline, some long-standing prank, or maybe that a sneaky outsider slipped it into the Constitution?
This amazement at a ruling affirming individual rights shows just how far they are from the Constitution's actual intent.
Because what’s the alternative here? If we don’t have an individual right to bear arms, that leaves only one group in the country with guns: the government.
Oh, that’s right, and who’s part of the government? Yes, ma’am, you are. So, maybe that’s why the ruling seems so baffling to you.
Presented here in the Public Interest because YouTube videos do not work well on Gab. You can watch the original video here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vuGf8KqJ44U
FAIR USE NOTICE: Videos and images on this channel may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S. Copyright Law.
-
17:00
Rogue Nation Eternal Militia
4 days agoWhy Living in Canada Has Become Unbearable
3121 -
LIVE
The Charlie Kirk Show
1 hour agoInside the Transition + The Bathroom Battle + Ban Pharma Ads? | Rep. Mace, Tucker, Carr | 11.21.24
11,161 watching -
59:20
The Dan Bongino Show
3 hours agoBitter CNN Goes After Me (Ep. 2375) - 11/21/2024
495K1.51K -
UPCOMING
TheAlecLaceShow
1 hour agoGuests: Alex Marlow & Terry Schilling | Justice For Laken Riley | Russian ICBM | The Alec Lace Show
38 -
UPCOMING
Danny Haiphong
59 minutes agoMARK SLEBODA & SCOTT RITTER: NATO ATTACKS RUSSIA, PUTIN FIRES ICBM WARNING SHOT AT UKRAINE—WW3 NEXT?
601 -
40:47
Dave Portnoy
4 hours agoThe Unnamed Show With Dave Portnoy, Kirk Minihane, Ryan Whitney - Episode 37
10.7K -
51:53
The Rubin Report
1 hour agoCrowd Shocked by Ben Affleck’s Unexpected Take on This Massive Change
24.7K19 -
2:07:25
Steven Crowder
4 hours agoBREAKING: Russia Launches ICBM for First Time in History - What Happens Next?
297K163 -
LIVE
The Shannon Joy Show
4 hours ago🔥🔥While Americans Are Watching WWE Politics: Australia Is Ramping Up MANDATORY Digital ID🔥🔥
431 watching -
LIVE
LFA TV
14 hours agoTHE FIGHT IN ONLY BEGINNING! | LIVE FROM AMERICA 11.21.24 11am EST
5,594 watching