Dr. Bridle: Its Not Incompetence. There Is A Lot Of Evidence Of Nefarious Activity & Nefarious Intent

"We need to investigate why health regulators intentionally withheld alarming data, thus negating informed consent and the precautionary principle, and causing substantial harm. Health regulatory agencies need to be gutted, and they need to be repopulated with non-conflicted subject matter experts of integrity.

Their primary funding needs to be switched from big pharma to primarily coming from tax dollars so they will be encouraged to promote service to tax payrs, not Big pharma.

We need to end academic censorship that is being done under the guise of combatting misinformation. You are going to see lots of people that just label everything I said to you as misinformation. They don't tell you what was misinformation and they don't tell you why it was misinformation. But in this case its not what I'm saying, its what their own health regulators with their own documents have said. So good luck with that.

Judges must stop granting judicial notice to health regulatory agencies and their employees. When I serve as a subject matter expert in court I have to defend everything I say, I have to present every shred of evidence that shows that the overall weight of the evidence supports what I'm saying. But when it comes to our health regulaory agencies and those who work for them, what they say is taken literally as the gospel truth, and they are not compelled to show up in court to provide any evidence to justify those statements.

Thats fine if they can be trusted, and if they have our best interests at heart, but as you can see they cannot be trusted. But as you can see, they cannot be trusted. They need to get in court beside the rest of us and defend their statements with primary scientific evidence.

I long ago had to write off the idea that this was just incompetence. You can see this was done with purpose, this was done with intent, There was intent behind redacting.. Cropping that figure to hide data. By hiding data they then came out with statements that were false, where they outright lied.

Its not incompetence, there is a lot of evidenc of nefarious activity, and nefaious intent.

When you see that these people have been lying and hiding data, they have been deceitful, that's all you need to know. Science aside, the scientifc debate becomres a moot point, We cannot trust these people. On that basis alone, when somebody's telling you to do something and you show that this person is a liar and a chronic liar, you should not be doing what they're telling you to do.

We need to stip taing thse shotes, we need a moratorium placed on these shots.'

Excerpts, Dr. Byram Bridle, Testimony at the National Citizens Inquiry, NCI Vancouver 2024 Hearings - Day 1, October 17, 2024.

---------------------------------------------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© )
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational purpose