Kentucky Voting Machines ONLY Vote for Kamala Harris

9 months ago

The fact is, no electronic voting machine can be trusted. They can either overtly control who the vote is given to, or they can secretly, within the software, change a vote from one candidate to another with no one the wiser. To date, every single time this happens, the vote is taken away from the Republican and given to the Democrat.

Elections in Kentucky are often held in public schools, libraries and other places with WiFi available, so it is also a concern that bad actors can hack the machines and change votes... especially since no one is permitted to see inside the machine to determine if it has a network card. When electronic voting machine companies go to great lengths to hide the software and hide the internal hardware, it is very easy to conclude election fraud will occur.

Even worse, the average Kentucky citizen has no way to evaluate the raw, unidentifiable voting data. Many states have information available to the public, such as the Cast Vote Record, also called the ballot log or summary of ballots.

It contains information, such as:

• Record #
• Timestamp
• Tabulator ID
• Municipality
• Precinct
• Batch ID
• Record ID
• Counting Group
• Session Type
• Ballot Type ID
• Paper Index
• Contest
• Candidate
• Undervotes
• Overvotes
• Mark Density

Many states also have reports called the Ballot Manifest Report or Tabulator Batch Report. This report includes the information that specifies the method by which each ballot was cast (ie: in person, by mail, provisional, absentee, etc.), again, with no way to identify the individual who voted.

I have sent multiple letters to the Fayette County Clerk's office requesting this information, but was explicitly told that information is not gathered and they have no such reports. I have contacted my state-level senator and representative, requesting Kentucky make this data available to the public... I got no response.

In Fayette County (Lexington, KY), we fill out a paper ballot, then slide it into a scanner... I guess to count the votes. We do not receive any type of receipt showing how we voted, so I have no way of knowing if the machine counted my votes correctly, or even at all. I have also asked the KY Secretary of State and my state representative and senator to make it part of the process to count the paper ballots to ensure they match the totals given by the machines. I was told counting all of them was unnecessary, that maybe doing a spot- check of 10% of the state's votes would be enough. However, we all know it only takes corruption in one or two cities to completely throw the election to the fraudsters. If those areas are not reconciled, the fraud will be completely missed.

It is up to the people of Kentucky to demand more transparency in our elections. If we are going to be using machines, they also need to include paper ballots, and the results of both need to reconcile to the same number of votes.

Kentuckians should also demand voting data be tracked and made available to the general public, such as the Cast Vote Record and the Ballot Manifest Report. When elections are allowed to be hidden as to how the votes are actually cast, then counted, then I guarantee you there will be fraud... and Kentuckians need to demand better for themselves.

Loading comments...