HB24-1304 - All Parking "For Rent" only

I am really happy that the sponsors and governor had a rousing round of Sim City, but forcing the municipalities to embrace your simulation by usurping zoning from local government and re-zoning all into multi-family in one-fell swoop.
Removing parking requirements so that developers can spend money on politicians instead of infrastructure. Your apartment parking lot can now build up the parking lot except for parking spaces they leave for rent.
Other bills remove occupancy limits and any familial restrictions.

Part of cramming as many tax-paying widgets into as small a space as possible.

"Climate" is the excuse to force your participation in order to make viable the mass transit that no one wants that is subsidized at over $2 per passenger mile to lumber slowly in the wrong direction, plus the additional $24million added for the 3% ridership (approx 120,000)--a subsidy of about $200 per rider per year.

You need 40 units per acre, but there is already a growing housing surplus. But now every parking lot will be a potential site for a high-rise condo in the building of the next housing bubble to prop up the developers as their work slows and developers leave the market.
Even without UNESCO’s recommendation to eliminate 350,000 people per day, the population is slowing, mainly to the increased embrace of the free-market system, while this general assembly works to impose a governmental system being rejected by those currently living under it.
You cannot have 40/acre without getting rid of parking requirement, but you’ve also added ADU’s that overwhelm the various grids