Court deals setback to Trump allies in ballot hand-count case _ The Excerpt

The case you're referring to likely involves a legal challenge by allies of Donald Trump seeking to implement or maintain hand-counting of ballots in U.S. elections, a method they argue is more secure than machine counting. These efforts are part of broader claims by Trump and his supporters about election fraud in past elections, particularly the 2020 presidential election.

However, courts have often rejected these arguments due to concerns over the impracticality of hand-counting large numbers of ballots, the potential for human error, and the inconsistency with established voting laws. Additionally, election officials and experts generally support machine counting for its speed and accuracy, particularly in high-turnout elections.

This "setback" likely means that the court has ruled against the Trump allies, preventing them from enforcing or promoting hand-counting practices. Would you like more specific information about the court case?
Here are some relevant tags you might consider for the topic:

- **Election Integrity**
- **Hand-Counting Ballots**
- **Trump Allies**
- **2024 Election**
- **Ballot Procedures**
- **Voting Laws**
- **Court Rulings**
- **Election Security**
- **Election Fraud Claims**
- **U.S. Elections**