COVID, SARS-CoV-2 emerged from dual use research. That means bioweapons research

Bret Weinstein: "We almost know that COVID, SARS-CoV-2 emerged from dual use research. That means bioweapons research. Right. Now, bioweapons people, Anthony Fauci, for example, have a couple of different problems.
They need to figure out if you're, if you, I would never produce bio weapons. I think it's immoral. But if you for some reason thought bio weapons needed to be produced, the question is always, how are you gonna produce a bio weapon that injures the people who are targeted and leaves the people that you're trying to protect safe? One obvious way to do it would be to vaccinate the population you're trying to protect so that they are not vulnerable the enemy is vulnerable. But in this case, this bioweapons research that seems to have produced this virus and the vaccine, which is a downstream product of the same bioweapons research, therefore, the spike protein is borrowed from the virus and it is loaded into these vaccines in transcript form, triggers an attenuation signal of immunity.
That means that people who got these shots, more than one of them at least, can now have an attenuation signal triggered in them by anything bearing the spike protein.
And we think our enemies haven't noticed that if they have a bioweapons program, that spike protein is now a mechanism to trigger attenuation in American. You've just created a massive susceptibility to... Yes. ..your enemy to attack. And if it's an accident, then it says, well, what is the consequence of bioweapons research? Well, you've just made the population that you supposedly, the population who paid for it, who you were supposed to be making safer, you just made them vulnerable. This IgG4, if there's a weakness, as you're saying that an enemy could utilize it, but they all took the vaccine too. So clearly, if that's a vulnerability, any enemy is going to say they can't create a weapon to attack the vulnerability because they're vulnerable too. I don't think so.
In fact, I believe it is correct to say the Chinese did not inoculate their population with anything mRNA-based or spike-based. So this would be the separation between populations that weapons makers are seeking just in a direction that is extremely unfortunate for the West."