Premium Only Content

EPA had not adequately addressed the potential risks posed by fluoride in public drinking water.
In the ICAN lawsuit against the EPA, the court ruled that the EPA had not adequately addressed the potential risks posed by fluoride in public drinking water. As a result, the EPA is now required to revisit its scientific evaluation of fluoride's safety, particularly in light of studies linking it to cognitive issues such as lower IQ and neurodevelopmental harm in children. The court directed the EPA to conduct a more thorough review, considering new evidence and reevaluating fluoride’s potential classification as a neurotoxin. This decision compels the agency to remedy its prior dismissal of the risks by taking a fresh, science-based approach to its fluoride policy. The outcome could potentially lead to changes in national water fluoridation standards if the EPA acknowledges the health risks posed.
-
LIVE
VINCE
1 hour agoOBAMA: Is It Treason Then? | Episode 91 - 07/23/25
35,494 watching -
LIVE
Law&Crime
1 hour agoLIVE: Bryan Kohberger Sentencing — ID v. Bryan Kohberger
938 watching -
Dear America
2 hours agoTRUMP Reveals MASSIVE Evidence Against OBAMA!! “ He’s The Ringleader” + Maxwell Subpoena APPROVED!!
19.7K59 -
LIVE
Badlands Media
1 hour agoBadlands Daily: July 23, 2025
2,672 watching -
LIVE
Matt Kohrs
9 hours agoStocks Push To Record High on New Trade Deals || Live Trading
784 watching -
LIVE
Wendy Bell Radio
5 hours agoGrasping At Straws
9,813 watching -
LIVE
Randi Hipper
27 minutes agoLOCAL BITCOIN BOTTOM IS IN? Technical Analysis with Cassius Cuvee
75 watching -
45:02
The Finance Hub
8 hours ago $0.07 earnedI CAN'T BELIEVE WHAT JUST HAPPENED TO HILLARY CLINTON!
1292 -
1:36:33
Chicks On The Right
4 hours agoOzzy gone, Portnoy vs Schultz, more on Colbert show ending, and Candace's likely new guest
8.73K1 -
LIVE
LFA TV
12 hours agoLFA TV ALL DAY STREAM - WEDNESDAY 7/23/25
4,779 watching