Bret Weinstein about vaccination being radical intervention

"I now regard anything that is delivered into the tissue with a hypodermic needle as a radical intervention. You will often hear people who are defending shots that have mercury in them by saying, well, yes, there's mercury in it, but it's less than there is in a tuna fish sandwich. Well, that is a game of smoke and mirrors. One, there shouldn't be any mercury in a tuna fish sandwich. That is the result of humans polluting the environment. Two, the amount of mercury in a tuna fish sandwich is not trivial, which is why pregnant women are advised to avoid them. Three, there is a huge difference between ingesting something into your gut, where your gut is wired not to transport things into your interior, your actual interior. So most of that mercury will pass through you if you eat it, whereas injecting it into you, this is not something you would normally be encountering. Your body doesn't have the mechanisms to deal with it, so its consequences are arbitrary. So in any case, when we inoculate, it seems like a minimal intervention. It is a radical intervention.
And I still believe that vaccination in the sense meant the original sense is potentially an extremely valuable intervention, but I absolutely do not trust the mechanisms that generate these products or that test them either for how effective they are or how safe they are."