BARBARA BUSH WAS A FUGLY ASS DEEP VOICED MAN

Wounded Veteran Gives Firey Speech https://rumble.com/v5ex5xp-wounded-vet-sam-brown-gave-a-fiery-speech-fight-fight-fight.html

New Insane Outdoor Fun 🤩 Brawling Leftist Videos For Those Of U.S. Who Have Not Yet Begun To Fight…

https://rumble.com/v5ez2y5-equal-rights-and-lefts-compilation-4.html

Submitted dutifully by VAT MEMBER SABOTAGE JEFF in Colorado.

patriots,
A message from MG Paul Vallely, USA, ret.
John Molloy, OSJ
View this post on the web at https://paulevallely.substack.com/p/nato-starting-a-war-with-russia
 
Stand Up America US Foundation
Morning Intelligence Report
MG Paul E Vallely US Army (Ret)
By
Stephen Bryen
September 13, 2024
There is no other way to interpret it: Washington and its client NATO members are declaring war on Russia. That is the direct meaning of Zelensky's forthcoming visit to Washington, during which the parties will agree on targets inside Russia. To say this is an insane, reckless move is an understatement.  This is the most dangerous step possible for the US and NATO, and it will lead to World War III.
Don't believe any garbage "justifying" the use of long-range missiles on Russia.
Putin has pointed out that while Ukraine will host the missiles, they will be fired by NATO personnel who will also insert the targeting data coming from overhead satellites covering Russian territory.  Those satellites are American. The upcoming Zelensky-Biden meeting should also include Harris so she takes full responsibility for starting a war.
No one can presume what the outcome will be.  Will Russia unleash nuclear weapons and bring a definitive end to the Ukraine war?  Will it shoot down American satellites?  Will Russia send rockets to hit supply depots in Europe, especially in Poland, which is the jumping-off point for military supplies to Ukraine?
There are many other possibilities open to Russia. Russia could transfer nuclear weapons to Iran, for example, or to Syria. 
The truth is Washington wants to take up Zelensky's proposals for deep strikes on Russian territory because Ukraine is losing the war and could be defeated even before the Presidential elections in November.  The Biden-Harris “team” will have to explain why they kept backing a loser, causing tens of thousands of casualties, instead of seeking a diplomatic settlement that was easily within their grasp. Here again, Washington stopped a deal in the making between Ukraine and Russia, and Biden and Harris are directly responsible for that.
Zelensky's strategy is easy to grasp. He knows everything is falling apart, and Ukraine won't be able to fight anymore by winter as the country's infrastructure, especially electrical power and fuel, dries up. Polish Foreign Minister Radosław Sikorski says that Ukraine’s electrical power has been degraded by 70%, perhaps more.
So Zelensky's strategy is to bring NATO directly into the war.  And, stupidly and arrogantly, Washington is playing the same game.
Other than the UK, no one wants to see a war in Europe.  The UK is no longer an important European country and lacks a land army worth talking about. Instead, its government built a few massively expensive aircraft carriers that functioned poorly, instead of strengthening its military and rebuilding its defenses. In any case, the UK dances to the US tune.  The British are anxious to attack Russia but haven’t bothered to figure out what will happen when Russia blows up the UK.
The big question is why Washington wants to fire missiles into Russia.  It means Biden, Sullivan and Blinken know their Ukraine policy is a disaster.  Instead of trying to open communications with the Russians, they are upping the ante and taking huge risks, with little idea how things will end up, unless they are getting ready to send in NATO troops and use NATO airpower in the Ukraine war.
Russia may not match the US in many military categories, but it occupies a large landmass and has strategic and tactical nuclear weapons.  We have known for years that Russia's military does not differentiate between tactical and strategic atomic systems; instead, they see them all along a continuum to be used as necessary.  What this means is that Russia can launch ICBMs and submarine IRBMs against US continental targets.  People in Washington should understand that the US has almost no continental air defenses capable of stopping a Russian nuclear attack.
Strategists have long worried about a so-called "first strike" capability.  I can't say Russia has that, but no one should want to find out.
The only hope is to persuade our current leaders, soon to be replaced, that they will be held accountable for starting a war without any grounds for doing so.  One of the features of government is that people make decisions without taking responsibility. In the case of World War III, no matter what soap opera propaganda flows into US newspapers, our leaders will have a lot of blood on their hands if they go ahead with bombing Russia.[1] [ #_ftn1 ]
Released by the Stand Up America US Foundation
Contact for Interview:  lauraperrymt@protonmail.com [ mailto:lauraperrymt@protonmail.com ]:
www.standupamericaus.org
[1] [ #_ftnref1 ] Weapons and Security, Stephen Bryen 9.13.2024
 
Unsubscribe https://substack.com/redirect/2/eyJlIjoiaHR0cHM6Ly9wYXVsZXZhbGxlbHk