I Voted for Hillary in 2016 But I'm Voting for Trump in 2024 Here's Why

by Glen Wallace

Two reasons I'm voting for Trump and not Harris that I talk about in my commentary is:

1. I believe Trump is a better advocate for protecting our free speech as is guaranteed in First Amendment of the US Constitution. I even start my video with a short clip of Walz claiming that hate speech and misinformation are not protected speech. I've yet to hear any walk back from the Harris Walz team about that statement. As a result, I've
concluded that it is part of Harris's platform to disregard the First Amendment of the US Constitution and under her administration, anyone may be subject to arrest if their speech is not acceptable to her. All Harris and Walz will have to do is instruct their Orwellian Ministry of Truth to arrest anyone who dares to disagree with, or criticize Queeny Kamala, and just claim the speech is 'hate speech' or 'misinformation.' I myself could be subject to arrest for my criticisms of Harris and the Democratic Party. I
don't want to get arrested by Harris's version of the former East German Stasi. While such predictions may sound farfetched, the UK has already arrested and charged over 3,000 of its own citizens for engaging in hate speech, under a new hate crime law they have enacted. The UK doesn't have anything resembling a Bill of Rights as we have here in the US.

But our Bill of Rights are only as good as those rights are recognized by the government and the judicial branch that is supposed to reign in the legislative and executive branches when they ignore those rights guaranteed in the Constitution. But, during the Biden Administration, there seems to be an effort to test the willingness of the Judicial
branch to safeguard our rights. The Supreme Court only partially blocked Biden's coercive vaccine mandate. Biden's Justice Department also charged and convicted a man, Douglass Mackey, for simply posting a meme tweet, a joke about an illegitimate way one could vote in the 2016 election. Mackey was sentenced to 7 months in prison for his mere
tweet that he had nothing even do with creating. I believe he is waiting on an appeal currently. Additionally, the FBI has been extremely heavy handed with the January 6th defendants. Many of those defendants were waved into the Capitol building by security and were merely engaging in peaceable assembly there, which is also protected by the
First Amendment of the constitution. Yet the FBI, which is part of Biden's Justice Department, ignored the defendant's rights, and still used extreme force, in full gear with guns blazing, to take down and arrest those peaceful protesters and then prosecute them with severe felony charges.

Here is the text of the First Amendment:

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

The Democrats seem to treat Orwell's 1984 as though it were an instruction manual, rather than the cautionary tale it was intended to be. A Harris Walz Administration would only go further in an effort to replicate the nightmare dystopian regime outlined by Orwell in his famous novel. Make Orwell fiction again; vote for Trump in 2024.

2. Trump also sounds much more of an advocate for peace when it comes to resolving and ending the Ukraine proxy war against Russia. Kamala, on the other hand, during the debate, sounds to be ready to escalate the war from its current proxy status to that of a full-blown direct war against Russia. A direct war between the US and Russia would
undoubtedly be World War III, which would put us all on the brink of annihilation by global thermonuclear war. Myself, I would just as soon avoid facing mushroom clouds on the horizon. I find Trumps solution; peace, to be much more agreeable than Kamala's solution; World War III. Kamala is delusional if she thinks Putin is going to invade Poland or
any other NATO nation if the US backs down and stops funding the foreign nation of Ukraine with hundreds of billions in military arms funding. The Ukraine war has been tremendously costly for Russia, both in terms of lives and treasure. There is absolutely no support from the Russian people to expand the current conflict any further than
Ukraine.

The Mainstream Western media has deceived the public on the reasons behind the Russian invasion of Ukraine. That mainstream media doesn't tell their audience that the war stems from the Ukraine coup the West orchestrated in 2014 that overthrew Ukraine's democratically elected president because he was willing to work with Russia. After the coup,
the ethnically Russian people of the Donbas region in Ukraine advocated for the return of the overthrown government that was willing to work and do business with Russia.

Because of that, the coup government bombed and shot their own people. That's right; the Ukraine government waged war against its own people from 2014 to 2022, killing 14,000 of its own citizens in the Donbas region of Eastern Ukraine. It is ironic that the propaganda that, in part, was used to try to justify the second Iraq war was the allegation

that Sadam Hussein gassed and killed his own people. But here we are now, with the war mongers, instead of calling out and holding the Ukraine government for doing the very same thing that Sadam was alleged to have done, are giving over a hundred billion dollars to the government of Ukraine that killed 14,000 of its own people!