An excerpt of Archbishop Viganò’s thoughts from the 8 Aug interview with T. Marshall /Part 1/

Watch this video on: https://vkpatriarhat.org/en/?p=24744

Subscribe to BCP newsletters https://bit.ly/3cJLzzm

Archbishop Viganò comments on the published version of the Third Secret of Fatima: “The text of the third part of the Secret of Fatima was delivered by Sister Lucia to the Bishop of Leiria in 1944: it refers to the vision that the three shepherd children had in 1917 and which the Virgin Mary expressly stated was to be revealed in 1960. It was delivered to the Holy Office in 1957, during the reign of Pius XII. John XXIII read it in 1959 and decided not to make it public.”
Archbishop Viganò goes on to say that the text of the Third Secret of Fatima has been manipulated: “Paul VI did the same in 1967. John Paul II read it in 1978. In 2000, on the occasion of the Jubilee, he ordered its publication, leaving people to believe that it was the complete text, saying that the vision of the stricken Pope referred to him, and more precisely to the attack he suffered in St Peter’s Square on 13 May 1981. The suspicion that the text of the Secret has been manipulated is more than well-founded. Beyond the anomalies and technical inconsistencies – such as the format of the paper support used by Sister Lucia – it seems clear to me that the ‘revealed’ content was censored, so as not to confirm what is there for all to see: the demolition of the Catholic Church from within.”
Archbishop Viganò speaks of the hierarchy subjecting the Secret of Fatima to its censorship: “On the other hand, it is not surprising that a Hierarchy that adulterates the Sacred Scripture and the Magisterium can also go so far as to censor the words of the Most Holy Virgin in the context of apparitions recognized by the Church.”
Carlo Maria Viganò explains why he was sent from the Secretariat General of the Vatican Governorate as Nuncio to the USA. It was not a promotion, but the opposite: “While Pope Benedict had twice expressed to me his desire to appoint me as President of the Prefecture of Economic Affairs of the Holy See in place of Cardinal Velasio de Paolis – a position, he told me, ‘in which I could best serve the Holy See’ – Bertone obtained my being sent to Washington, away from the Roman Curia and those I had ‘disturbed’ in my fight against corruption.”
Archbishop Viganò states the reason for Bergoglio’s interest in his fight against corruption. Bergoglio was not interested in eliminating corruption, but in finding out the names of corrupt prelates so that he could blackmail them: “On 23 June 2013 when I met Bergoglio, after he asked me about McCarrick and the Jesuits in the USA in order to feel out my position, he asked me to give him the dossier that I had given to the three Cardinals appointed by Benedict to investigate. I did so immediately, and he told me, ‘I have a small safe in my bedroom. Now I’ll take it over there (which he did) and read it this evening.’
It is obvious that Bergoglio was only interested in knowing who the corrupt people were in order to be able to use, control, and blackmail them.”
Cardinal Fernández pronounced the so-called latae sententiae excommunication on Carlo Maria Viganò, allegedly for the crime of schism. Archbishop Viganò himself explains why this so-called excommunication is invalid: “On 11 June 2024, I was informed by a simple email (without ever receiving any official notification) of a canonical trial against me, and was told that if I wished to oppose the accusations made against me, I needed to appear in Rome just nine days later, on 20 June, or else to submit my written defence by 28 June, the Vigil of the Feast of Saints Peter and Paul.
The charges brought against me are completely inconsistent: I am accused of schism for having questioned the legitimacy of Bergoglio and for having rejected Vatican II.”
Furthermore, Archbishop Viganò states in which case the penalty of the law does not apply to the accused person. He points out that the law takes into account the conviction of the accused person that the one who sits on the Throne of Peter is not the Pope. According to Sacred Scripture, the Church Fathers and Doctors of the Church, a manifest heretic is ipso facto excommunicated from the Church and is therefore not a valid Pope: “But the law recognizes the non-applicability of the will or intention to commit schism in the case in which the accused person is persuaded that the one who sits on the Throne of Peter is not the Pope and, where the groundlessness of his suspicions is demonstrated, is willing to submit to his authority. I consider Jorge Mario Bergoglio an anti-pope – or better said, a counter-pope, a usurper, an emissary of the anti-Catholic lobby that has infiltrated the Church for decades. The evidence that he is completely alien to the papacy, his multiple heresies, and the coherence of his subversive acts of government and ‘magisterium’ are very serious elements that cannot be hastily dismissed as a crime of lese-majesty.”
The Archbishop goes on to explain how the validity of documents issued by the Roman dicasteries is affected when the papacy is usurped by a false pope: “Regardless of the method and merit of the extra-judicial canonical case, the vacancy of the Apostolic See and the usurpation of the Throne of Peter by a false pope render all the acts of the Roman Dicasteries completely void of validity and efficacy, so even the excommunication against me is null.”
Archbishop Viganò discusses the nature of the show trial and calls it a canonical short circuit. When denounced for heresy, Bergoglio does not respond by renouncing heresy, but by absurdly accusing of schism the one who truthfully denounced him. In the case of Bergoglio, the false pope, schism is impossible. The paradox is that this invalid pope pronounces the sentence of excommunication upon an innocent person on grounds of an unreal schism. Bergoglio has already excommunicated himself several times by his heresies: “We are faced with a canonical short circuit: the one who holds the supreme earthly authority in the Church, at the moment in which he is denounced for heresy, responds by accusing of schism the one who denounces him, and excommunicates him. This instrumental use of justice – typical of dictatorships – contradicts the mens of the Legislator.”
Archbishop Viganò refers to the dogmatic bull of Paul IV, which, on the basis of the Holy Scripture (Gal 1:8-9), states that a manifest heretic – and today he is Bergoglio – has excommunicated himself from the Church and from the Mystical Body of Christ and all his actions are null and void: “... what is foreseen by the Bull of Paul IV: it is the very adhesion to heresy that expels the heretic from the Church and renders his authority illegitimate, invalid, and null.”
Archbishop Viganò names those most dangerous in the Vatican today for their complicity in the systematic destruction of the Church: “After Bergoglio, the most dangerous are Fernàndez, Hollerich, Roche, Peña Parra… These men, together with the Secretary of State Parolin, are all accomplices in the disastrous management of the Vatican and the entire Church.”
As for Cardinal Parolin, the Archbishop draws attention to an extraordinary fact about which, however, there is silence: “I recall in passing that Parolin was a member of the network of the Second Section of the Secretariat of State, at that time headed by the Freemason Silvestrini, a leading member of the St Gallen Mafia, to whom he owes his rise.”

+ Elijah
Patriarch of the Byzantine Catholic Patriarchate

+ Methodius OSBMr + Timothy OSBMr
Secretary Bishops

8 September 2024