Customer Acquisition Tools For Big Pharma | Clip

Full Interview: https://rumble.com/v5egwwh-james-roguski-united-nations-general-assembly-2024.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp

Transcript:
WHO and all of these negotiations, they want to be in the position to oversee the business aspect of it, the approving of products so that they can be manufactured, then put in some sort of depot so that they're there, you know, whenever they need to pull them off the shelves to use to scare people, it's difficult to get your local tyrants to inject people with vaccines or any other type of treatment if you don't have it sitting on the shelf ready to go.

And what they learned was that the nations who did not have the manufacturing capacity, primarily Africa, but other nations in other areas that are low income, they weren't able to abuse the people in the manner that they had hoped.

And so what these negotiations are really all about is let's take billions of dollars and build out the infrastructure where it was missing so that we can have a problem here and a problem there and a problem there.

And the local oligarchs can profit by homegrown, you know, geographically distributed manufacturing of products that harm people.

I mean, the drugs like remdesivir and midazolam and all of the, you know, antivirals that did not work and cause problems, you cannot even begin to even remotely think that AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson's Jabs, which had been removed from the market because of the harm they caused, was a wonderful beneficial innovation.

And you can't say the same thing about Moderna or Pfizer's or Novartis or any of the other products.

Yes they did not kill everyone who took it.

But when you deal with statistics and you realize that even a tiny little percent of harm, when you do that to 8 billion people or whatever the number may have been that they injected, you're causing enormous harm and death to an enormous number of people.

And that is not acceptable.

You cannot say any of these drugs or jabs are safe and effective because they're neither.

They're dangerous to a percentage of the population immediately.

And then the long-term aspects of it with the turbo cancers and all of the immune dysfunction and everything else, I've always referred to tests and drugs and jabs as customer acquisition tools for big pharma.

They take healthy people, they convince them that they need to have a checkup or a test or a screening mammograms for women in breast cancer or prostate specific antigen tests, PSA tests for men with prostate issues or blood pressure or cholesterol or sugar.

Take a healthy person, run enough tests on them, you're going to occasionally find a result that's just wrong or off temporarily and it's used as a hard high pressure sales tactic to convince people to swallow or inject a poison that degrades their health and oh, well, you got to take that for the rest of your life and you got to come back for more tests and more MRIs and it's a customer acquisition tool.

They convinced probably millions of people that were totally healthy, that they were asymptomatic carriers of SARS-CoV-2 virus that has never been proven to exist simply on the basis of a test.

And so if you have any test, even if it's 99% accurate, that 1% margin for error rate, if you give it to billions of people, you could generate a case demo pseudo pandemic anytime you want just by running enough people through your fraudulent test.