New revelations on 9/11: a pilot’s perspective on what really happened.

Wil je het artikel in het Nederlands? Klik de link hieronder. (scroll down for English)
https://vrijheidsberoving.nl/nieuwe-onthullingen-over9-11-het-perspectief-van-een-piloot-op-wat-er-werkelijk-is-gebeurd/

Veteran pilot raises new questions about 9/11, suggesting remote-controlled aircraft may have been involved in the attacks on the Twin Towers & Pentagon.
How much of the official story are we still missing?

As the anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks approaches, fresh questions and alternative perspectives continue to surface, challenging the official narrative of that day. Captain Dan Hanley, a veteran pilot and key member of "911 Pilot Whistleblowers," recently voiced his concerns in an eye-opening interview, questioning the likelihood that inexperienced hijackers could have executed such complex maneuvers without assistance. His perspective sheds new light on the possibility of remote-controlled technology being involved in the attacks on both the Pentagon and the Twin Towers.

The Pentagon Attack: A Cruise Missile or Airliner?
The Pentagon crash remains one of the most puzzling aspects of 9/11. Initial live reports, including those from CNN, suggested no evidence of a Boeing 757 striking the Pentagon. Journalists at the scene reported no visible debris that would indicate a large plane had crashed. Small fragments were found, but no substantial wreckage—such as tail sections or wings—was visible. This fueled speculation that something other than American Airlines Flight 77, perhaps a missile, might have struck the building.

The footage of the impact, which remains grainy and vague, shows an object hitting the Pentagon, but many believe it doesn’t look like a commercial airliner. However, Hanley avoids definitively claiming that a missile struck the Pentagon. Instead, he raises a critical question: If Flight 77 didn’t crash into the building, what happened to the aircraft and its passengers?

Hanley suggests that Flight 77 may have been electronically hijacked using advanced autopilot systems and diverted elsewhere. He points out that if this theory holds true, the fate of the aircraft and passengers remains a mystery. The retired pilot is careful to distance himself from conspiracy theories that claim a missile hit the Pentagon but highlights the fact that no solid evidence exists to support the official account.

Twin Towers and Remote Control: Aerial Precision Too Good to Be True?
When it comes to the attacks on the World Trade Center, Hanley is adamant that the official story doesn't add up. He points out that both American Airlines Flight 11 and United Airlines Flight 175 struck the Twin Towers with extraordinary precision. The pilots, described as unskilled and inexperienced, would have needed fighter-pilot-level expertise to hit their targets on the first attempt. The Twin Towers, each 208 feet wide, were struck with only 156 feet of wingspan, leaving virtually no room for error.

The speeds at which the aircraft were traveling made the task even more difficult. Several pilots, including veterans with years of experience in both military and commercial aviation, believe such accuracy would have been nearly impossible for amateurs. Hanley draws an analogy: “It would be like driving a semi-truck at high speed and trying to fit it perfectly into a narrow garage on your first attempt.” He adds that even experienced pilots, in simulated conditions, found it difficult to replicate the flights at such speeds.

Some theories, particularly from the "no-plane" faction, suggest that holograms or CGI were used to depict the crashes. Hanley dismisses these ideas, emphasizing that planes did indeed strike the buildings. However, he points to photographic evidence of what appears to be an unusual “pod” on the underside of United Airlines Flight 175 before it hit the South Tower, raising questions about whether the plane had been modified or swapped with a military-grade aircraft. Hanley believes it’s plausible that the planes could have been remotely piloted using an “uninterruptible autopilot,” a technology that has existed since 1944 and was in development for exactly these types of scenarios.

If this technology was in place, it could explain how both planes managed to hit the towers with military precision. The planes’ path, speed, and accuracy might have been controlled by external forces, leading Hanley and his team of whistleblowers to suspect CIA involvement in orchestrating the crashes. This would have allowed for a highly coordinated attack, devoid of human error, and one that perfectly executed its devastating objective on the first try.

The Shanksville Mystery: Did Flight 93 Really Crash?
The crash of United Airlines Flight 93 in a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania, also raises suspicions. Official reports state that passengers fought back against the hijackers, leading to the plane crashing into the field. However, Hanley believes there’s more to the story. He references a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request that revealed a 70-acre debris field, including body parts and aircraft fragments. This indicates that the plane may have come apart mid-air, which is consistent with a missile strike or an explosion on board.

While some believe Flight 93 may have been electronically hijacked and redirected elsewhere, Hanley does not delve too deeply into these claims. However, he does acknowledge the possibility that the plane was shot down or experienced a catastrophic failure in mid-flight. The fact that debris was spread over such a large area, rather than concentrated in a single crash site, adds credence to this theory.

Unanswered Questions and Missing Evidence
One of the most damning aspects of Hanley’s presentation is his critique of the 9/11 Commission Report. Several key testimonies were excluded from the final report, including statements from flight instructors who had evaluated the hijackers' abilities. One instructor outright refused to lease a Cessna to one of the hijackers, claiming he was not capable of flying it competently. Despite this, the official narrative claims these same individuals were able to execute complex, high-speed maneuvers with large commercial jets on 9/11.

Hanley also highlights the case of an Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) soldier who signed off on key components of the 9/11 investigation and whose involvement raises questions. Why was this individual’s testimony included in the final report while critical testimonies from flight instructors were ignored? Such discrepancies point to a broader cover-up, Hanley argues, with the goal of protecting the true perpetrators of the attacks.

Who Benefits from the Attacks?
As with any major historical event, it's important to ask who stood to gain from the aftermath of 9/11. Hanley points to the trillions of dollars funneled into the military-industrial complex as a result of the “War on Terror.” Iraq, Afghanistan, and other parts of the Middle East have been destabilized, while defense contractors and political interests continue to profit from ongoing conflicts.

"Who benefits the most from having us in a permanent war?" Hanley asks, noting that the endless wars in the Middle East have enriched certain sectors while leaving a trail of devastation in their wake. He believes that 9/11 was used as a pretext to launch these wars, suggesting that elements within the CIA, the military, and other government agencies may have been complicit in orchestrating the attacks to ensure long-term profit and geopolitical control.

The Road Ahead
Despite presenting a compelling case built on aviation expertise and firsthand knowledge, Hanley is keen to distance himself from pure speculation. His goal is to present the facts as he understands them, based on his decades of flying experience and his interactions with other pilots. Hanley and the "911 Pilot Whistleblowers" continue to seek answers, and they urge anyone with further information to come forward.

As the debate around the true nature of 9/11 continues, Captain Hanley’s work serves as a stark reminder that many aspects of the tragedy remain unexplained. For those willing to question the official story, Hanley’s testimony offers a chilling alternative narrative, one that suggests a highly coordinated and technologically advanced conspiracy may have played a central role in the attacks that forever changed the world.