Dr. Astrid Stuckelberger: We Don't Have Debate, We Have Censorship -- and Dictatorship

1 month ago
17

Its the politicization of a new science, a fake science has consequences for people's lives. They censor treatments that work, like Ivermectin, they put in their own data which is a complete conflict of interest.

The Agenda of this big coalition of families is real, they are not hiding what they want to do. They are trying to lockdown the liberties of people -- the freedom of people is really disturbing them. They want to annihilate thinking and emotion and cognition.

Our mind is linear, but these technologies are exponential. ID passports will force people to be vaccinated regularly to travel, and to have their freedom. The plan extends to 2031: John Hopkins University has issued a pandemic plan for SARS 2025 & 2028. Every flu is going to be transformed into a drumming drama. They are using fear to create a perpetual pandemic. Its the worst nightmare you could have -- to be in fear your whole life, for perpetual vaccines.

If there wasn’t a deeper agenda behind the PCR-test, there would be no need to stick a test-swab deep into your sinuses where it touches a thin membrane that separates the sinus cavity from your brain. A saliva sample would be enough. The question raised by Dr. Stuckelberger is whether they are putting a toxic substance into your brain – which affects the pineal gland?

-----------------------------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© ) material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational Purposes- Not For Profit- Non-Commercial.

Loading comments...