PUBLIC NOTICE: U.S. District Court of Connecticut is an "ENEMY" of "We the People".

FROM THE DESK OF Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, American and Beneficiary in Equity-Executor

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT
AUGUST 28, 2024
CASE 3:24-CV-01103-SVN

[Sui Juris Petitioner, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard]
Vs.
[In their individual capacity, United States District of Connecticut Judge Sarala V. Nagala, Connecticut Superior Court Judge Scott M. Jones, Judge Gary White, Judge Peter McShane, Judge Mary Elizabeth Reid, Judge Maria Gonzalez, Judge John F. Blawie, Judge Kevin Randolph, Judge Bruce Hudock, Judge Kenneth Provodator, and Judge Kevin Hernandez],

AUGUST 28, 2024

PUBLIC NOTICE

CGS 54-170 ARREST WITHOUT WARRANT
THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF CONNECTICUT HAS NO AUTHORITY TO ADJUDICATE AS IT IS “AT WAR WITH THE U.S. CONSTITUTION” AND “ENGAGES IN ACTS OF TREASON”. THE COMPLICIT COURT IS AN “ENEMY” OF THE AMERICAN PEOPLE ENGAGED IN “DOMESTIC TERRORISM”, “RACKETEERING”, “TREASON” AND MORE.

The Constitution is harmed by subverting its authority as the foundational law of the land. A domestic enemy is any American who either promotes foreign invasion or attacks the Bill of Rights. The former assaults national stability. The latter assaults individual freedoms.

As a living-breathing American Man, one of “We the People”, the Fourth Branch of Our Government, I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, have authority to address any felony that I witness firsthand.

“Inalienable Rights” and Authority

The U.S. Constitution recognized that certain universal rights cannot be taken away by legislation, as they are beyond the control of a government, being naturally given to every individual at birth, and that these rights are retained throughout life.

Supreme Court Case Law:
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)
Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).