'Holocaust Survivor': Even When Caught In Holohoax Lies, Jews Still Lie In Admitting The Duplicity

These people and all accomplishes should be charged with fraud and imprisoned for 20 years. All profits should also be confiscated.
These lies amount to defaming other people as well. Its a serious crime.

Even while admitting it was all lies he pretends it wasn't really a lie because "It was true in my imagination". IN other words he denies all real accountability all real agency. (All lies are, that's what lying is. Satan's Chosen People lie as a way of life. Sicut judaeis non)

At a deeper level, I suppose, a fundamental aspect of Jewish intellectual history has been the realization that there is really no demonstrable difference between truth and consensus.

Within traditional Jewish religious discourse, “truth” was the prerogative of a privileged interpretive elite that in traditional societies consisted of the scholarly class within the Jewish community.

Within this community, “truth” and “reality” were nothing more (and were undoubtedly perceived as nothing more) than consensus within a sufficiently large portion of the interpretive community.

It never occurred to the members of this discourse community to seek confirmation of their views from outside the community of intellectual discourse itself, either from other (Gentile) discourse communities or by trying to understand the nature of reality itself.

Reality was whatever the group decided it should be, and any dissent from this socially constructed reality would have to be performed within a narrow intellectual space that would not endanger the overall goals of the group. Acceptance of the Jewish canon, was essentially an act of authoritarian submission.

‘The Culture of Critique’, by Kevin MacDonald

Mirror: 'Holocaust Survivor', Stringer Theory, Redpill Remakes, 2024.

--------------------------------------------
Posted for educative purposes under THE FAIR USE NOTICE: These Videos may contain copyrighted (© )
material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. Such material is made available to advance understanding of ecological, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, moral, ethical, and social justice issues, etc. It is believed that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior general interest in receiving similar information for research and educational purposes.

For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode​ "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use." Disclaimer: 17 Notwithstanding the Provisions of Sections 17 U.S.C. @ 106 and 17 U.S.C. @ 106A, the Fair Use of a Copyrighted work for Educational purpose
------------------------------------