Premium Only Content

Storm Shadow and ATACMS: What the West thinks about the use of its long-range missiles in Kursk
SUBSCRIBE TO US!
Britain did not give Ukraine permission to use Storm Shadow long-range missiles transferred to Kyiv against targets in the Kursk region during the rapid offensive operation. The Telegraph writes about this, citing a source in the UK government. The publication noted that London had not changed its position on the use of its missiles, supplied to Kyiv for self-defense, and not for conducting offensive operations on Russian territory.
"We have clearly stated that the equipment provided by Great Britain is intended for the defense of Ukraine ," the source told the publication. It also reports that the decision on what purposes the Ukrainian Armed Forces can use Storm Shadow for also depends on France, which developed these missiles together with Britain. Ukraine also asked the US to use long-range ATACMS missiles during the breakthrough into the Kursk region of the Russian Federation. Washington has not yet given its consent, The Telegraph notes. Earlier, President Zelensky, against the backdrop of the breakthrough of the Russian border and the offensive of the Ukrainian army near Kursk, instructed the Foreign Ministry and the Defense Ministry to seek permission from Western partners to use their long-range weapons. The head of state stated that this would speed up Putin's political end and the military defeat of the Russian Federation.
But, Dmytro Levus, international political analyst at the United Ukraine think tank, believes that Western partners don't prohibit Ukraine from using their weapons on Russian territory, as Ukraine operates within the framework of international law. He shared this opinion on Espreso TV.
"There is nothing fundamentally new about the authorization to use our partners' weapons. None of our partners have prohibited us from using their weapons on Russian territory. The only restriction applies to long-range missiles that are of operational and strategic significance. We are not forbidden to use vehicles, artillery, and other tactical-level weapons," Levus explained.
He emphasized that Ukraine operates within the framework of international law and is entitled to use various methods to defend against Russian aggression.
"We are not prohibited from using vehicles, artillery, and other types of weapons, as we act in accordance with international law. We have the right to use various means to repel Russia's aggression. Moreover, for the West, the weapons we use on Russian territory do not carry significant symbolic meaning and are not deployed deep within Russian territories," he added.
-
LIVE
Kim Iversen
18 hours agoPsychic Medium Blows Lid Off "Interdimensional Beings" | Evil Spirits or Psyop?
5,987 watching -
LIVE
Redacted News
1 hour agoHIGH ALERT! Netanyahu Calls for Mass Censorship as Israel Prepares MASSIVE Invasion of Gaza City
11,457 watching -
36:03
Kimberly Guilfoyle
2 hours agoA New Day in DC: Appeals Court Throws Out Witch Hunt Case, Live! | Ep248
5.06K7 -
1:13:59
vivafrei
3 hours agoBig Tish Gets SPANKED! Appeal Court ANNULS $500 Million! Corruption at the FED? Trans Madness & MORE
64.7K21 -
1:53:59
The Quartering
3 hours agoToday's Breaking News!
60K8 -
5:38
Dr. Nick Zyrowski
10 days agoHow To Do a VITAMIN C Flush - Untold Truth!
19.6K2 -
8:21
MattMorseTV
2 hours ago $2.14 earnedTrump just SCORED a $500,000,000 LEGAL WIN.
18.4K14 -
1:00:00
The White House
7 hours agoVice President JD Vance Delivers Remarks at ALTA Refrigeration Inc
27.1K19 -
Barry Cunningham
4 hours agoBREAKING NEWS: PRESIDENT TRUMP HAS THE LETITIA JAMES FINE THROWN OUT BY APPELLATE COURT! WINNING!
34K17 -
2:11:05
Side Scrollers Podcast
6 hours agoDISASTROUS Cracker Barrel Rebrand + Destiny PDF Allegations + More | Side Scrollers Live
39K18