Premium Only Content

Storm Shadow and ATACMS: What the West thinks about the use of its long-range missiles in Kursk
SUBSCRIBE TO US!
Britain did not give Ukraine permission to use Storm Shadow long-range missiles transferred to Kyiv against targets in the Kursk region during the rapid offensive operation. The Telegraph writes about this, citing a source in the UK government. The publication noted that London had not changed its position on the use of its missiles, supplied to Kyiv for self-defense, and not for conducting offensive operations on Russian territory.
"We have clearly stated that the equipment provided by Great Britain is intended for the defense of Ukraine ," the source told the publication. It also reports that the decision on what purposes the Ukrainian Armed Forces can use Storm Shadow for also depends on France, which developed these missiles together with Britain. Ukraine also asked the US to use long-range ATACMS missiles during the breakthrough into the Kursk region of the Russian Federation. Washington has not yet given its consent, The Telegraph notes. Earlier, President Zelensky, against the backdrop of the breakthrough of the Russian border and the offensive of the Ukrainian army near Kursk, instructed the Foreign Ministry and the Defense Ministry to seek permission from Western partners to use their long-range weapons. The head of state stated that this would speed up Putin's political end and the military defeat of the Russian Federation.
But, Dmytro Levus, international political analyst at the United Ukraine think tank, believes that Western partners don't prohibit Ukraine from using their weapons on Russian territory, as Ukraine operates within the framework of international law. He shared this opinion on Espreso TV.
"There is nothing fundamentally new about the authorization to use our partners' weapons. None of our partners have prohibited us from using their weapons on Russian territory. The only restriction applies to long-range missiles that are of operational and strategic significance. We are not forbidden to use vehicles, artillery, and other tactical-level weapons," Levus explained.
He emphasized that Ukraine operates within the framework of international law and is entitled to use various methods to defend against Russian aggression.
"We are not prohibited from using vehicles, artillery, and other types of weapons, as we act in accordance with international law. We have the right to use various means to repel Russia's aggression. Moreover, for the West, the weapons we use on Russian territory do not carry significant symbolic meaning and are not deployed deep within Russian territories," he added.
-
11:08
It’s the Final Round
13 hours ago $0.67 earned💰NFL Week 6 Best Bets🔥Player Prop Picks, Parlays, Predictions FREE Today October 12th
3.07K2 -
29:03
itsSeanDaniel
2 days agoIllegal Migrants REVEAL How They're INVADING Europe 🇪🇺
14.6K17 -
8:08
MattMorseTV
17 hours ago $13.20 earnedThe USA - China TRADE WAR just went NUCLEAR.
23.8K44 -
20:22
Real Estate
8 days ago $7.12 earnedNumber 1 Indicator Home Prices ARE ABOUT TO CRASH
15.4K6 -
30:09
Afshin Rattansi's Going Underground
19 hours ago‘Gaza Will Haunt Israel for Generations’- Mika Almog Granddaughter of Former President Shimon Peres
14.5K8 -
15:36
Nikko Ortiz
15 hours agoBring Back Public Shaming...
18.6K10 -
2:43:41
Side Scrollers Podcast
21 hours agoAsmongold Says The Online Left Are “ANIMALS” + Hasan Collar-Gate Gets WORSE + More | Side Scrollers
24.8K22 -
1:33:41
Dinesh D'Souza
2 days agoThe Dragon's Prophecy Film
94.9K62 -
LIVE
Lofi Girl
2 years agoSynthwave Radio 🌌 - beats to chill/game to
362 watching -
44:08
The Why Files
6 days agoThe CIA, Men in Black and the Plot to Take Out JFK | The Maury Island Incident
56K71