Premium Only Content

⚖️ Understanding Federal Jurisdiction Through Consent ⚖️ In this compelling video, we
⚖️ Understanding Federal Jurisdiction Through Consent ⚖️
In this compelling video, we explore a fascinating courtroom scenario where a man demonstrated that federal jurisdiction over an individual requires their voluntary consent. By refusing to acknowledge the court's authority verbally, he underscored the legal principle that the government's power is not inherent but contractual.
📜 The Power of Recognizance and Jurisdiction 📜
The story illustrates that when the individual's name was called, he chose not to answer verbally. Instead, he walked into the bar area without acknowledging the court personnel, symbolically refusing to enter into a contract with them. When questioned about his identity, he pointedly declared to all present, "I do not recognize you," signaling his refusal to contract with the court. According to Black's Law Dictionary, 'recognizance' involves an individual contracting with judicial entities, thus affirming that jurisdiction is based on mutual consent.
🔍 Case Law and Legal Foundations 🔍
The video further delves into the 1938 Supreme Court case, Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins, which emphasizes that where no contract exists, there can be no case. This principle was foundational in the man's assertion of his rights; by refusing to enter into a contractual recognizance, he effectively denied the court jurisdiction over him. The case law reinforces the idea that legal authority is not absolute but derived from consensual agreements.
🛡 Implications for Legal Proceedings 🛡
This powerful example highlights the critical importance of understanding legal terminology and principles such as recognizance and jurisdiction. The man's actions demonstrate that by consciously opting out of such contracts, one can refuse governance and jurisdiction by external authorities. It serves as a pivotal reminder that consent is a cornerstone of legal authority and that individuals have the right to question and refuse imposed jurisdiction.
Watch the video to gain a deeper understanding of these legal dynamics and how asserting your rights can impact the jurisdictional power of the federal government over you.
Learn more, watch the free courses:
SecretCivics. com (remove the space)
Please download and repost
We need to educate / not relocate!
-
2:32:23
The Quartering
4 hours agoOn To The Big Bosses! Act 2 Of Expedition 33
36.5K4 -
LIVE
SpartakusLIVE
6 hours agoTiger Blood RESTOCKED and 30% off w/ code SPARTAKUS30
525 watching -
24:58
Law&Crime
6 hours ago $0.56 earnedSecond Note Leaves Disturbing Clues in New York City Killings
15.2K5 -
1:36:57
Badlands Media
22 hours agoAltered State S3 Ep. 39
43.8K10 -
2:04:07
Due Dissidence
12 hours agoCharlie Kirk's GAZA LIES, Caitlin Clark Stalker, Palantir Goes Hollywood - w/ Kyle Matovcik | TMWS
18K5 -
LIVE
I_Came_With_Fire_Podcast
13 hours agoAmerica First, Trump Threatens China, Your Friendly Neighborhood Illegal, EPA Gets a "W"
354 watching -
LIVE
Geeks + Gamers
3 hours agoGeeks+Gamers Play- MARIO KART WORLD
135 watching -
8:28:19
Dr Disrespect
12 hours ago🔴LIVE - DR DISRESPECT - BATTLEFIELD 1 - FULL GAME
161K7 -
1:39:26
Glenn Greenwald
8 hours agoStephen Miller's False Denials About Trump's Campus "Hate Speech" Codes; Sohrab Ahmari on the MAGA Splits Over Antitrust, Foreign Wars, and More | SYSTEM UPDATE #495
105K54 -
1:57:28
Omar Elattar
8 hours agoThe $300M CEO: "The One Skill That Made Me Rich In 15 Different Countries!"
16.8K