Matt Walsh: ‘Kamala Harris’s Lack of Children Makes Her Less Qualified’

Matt Walsh argues that Kamala Harris’s lack of children makes her less qualified for the presidency. He compares her unfavorably to George Washington, who also did not have children but is considered an exceptional figure in American history.

“Now, sure, George Washington is one of the greatest figures in American history, president or otherwise, and he didn’t have children. But there are exceptions to every rule, and I have no problem accepting him as one of them.

I’ll put it this way. If Kamala Harris was the second coming of George Washington, I would not be at all concerned about her lack of children. But she isn’t. Okay, not even close. So anytime someone says, well, but George Washington didn’t have kids. Yeah, that’s George Washington. Okay, Kamala Harris is not George Washington.”

Walsh emphasizes that historical childless presidents did not choose to be childless, contrasting them with Harris’s career-driven choice. He concludes that Harris’s lack of children disqualifies her from being a viable presidential candidate.