Article 4928 Video - International Public Notice: The Bear in the China Shop By Anna Von Reitz

Help support the work of Anna and the Living Law Firm here https://asnsecure.com/DONATIONS.asp or if you have Cash.App, send to $AnnaReize.

Article 4928 Video - International Public Notice: The Bear in the China Shop - Monday, July 8, 2024 By Anna Von Reitz

The following brief case commentary from the United States Supreme Court (the Federal Republic Court in 1805) comes from a Law Memorandum written by the immortal John Trowbridge in which he is at pains to explain the difference between confederate states (States of America) operating the Federal Republic under The Constitution for the united States of America and the District States created by General Washington as administrative units of the Territorial District of Columbia Government and all of these "states" versus the Territories and Possessions of the United States known as the "Insular States":

"The Supreme Court explains the political distinction between, on the one hand, the members of
the Union, and on the other, the District of Columbia and the territories:

"On the part of the plaintiffs, it has been urged that Columbia is a distinct political society, and is therefore “a state” according to the definitions of writers on general law.

This is true. But as the act of Congress obviously uses the word “state” in reference to the term as used in the Constitution, it becomes necessary to inquire whether Columbia is a state in the sense of that instrument.

The result of that examination is a conviction that
the members of the American confederacy only are the states contemplated in the Constitution.

. . . These clauses show that the word “state” is used in the Constitution as designating a member of the union [of the original Confederation doing business as the States of America], and excludes from the term the signification attached to it by writers on the law of nations."

[Underline and boldface emphasis added.] Hepburn & Dundas v. Ellzey, 6 U.S. 445, 452, 2 Cranch 445, 2 L.Ed. 332 (1805).

"It has been attempted to distinguish a Territory from the district [sic] of Columbia; but the court is of opinion that this distinction cannot be maintained.

Continue reading http://www.paulstramer.net/2024/07/international-public-notice-bear-in.html

Download and print http://annavonreitz.com/bearinthechinashop.pdf

Read the latest from Twenty One of Ed's Fav
Alternative News Sites on https://eddiesbloglist.rocks/

Follow EddiesBlogList on Telegram https://t.me/eddiesbloglistrocks

Elevate your frequency with Orgone Energy https://www.sacredintuitiveelements.com/

These article videos are made with "The #1 Text to Speech Reader" https://share.speechify.com/mztVMwL and recorded with ScreenPal https://screenpal.com/

NOTE from Ed:
Trust only the information and
processes found on these websites:
Download and print https://annavonreitz.com
Discussion http://paulstramer.net
Correct Your Status https://tasa.americanstatenationals.org/
Global Family (Bank) Prepaid 528 Prosperity https://global528.com/
National Debt Relief https://signinamerica.com/
Thank you. ~ Ed