If A Product Is Safe, Why Do You Need To Give A Manufacturer Immunity To Liability?

Watch the full hearing: Follow the Science? - Oversight of the Biden Covid-19 Administrative State Response https://rumble.com/v561c40-follow-the-science-oversight-of-the-biden-covid-19-administrative-state-res.html?mref=1bxo9j&mc=69gy3

Watch a full interview on vaccines with Aaron Siri: https://rumble.com/v3woj01-aaron-siri-why-are-vaccine-manufacturers-the-most-protected-companies-in-am.html?mref=1bxo9j&mc=69gy3

Aaron Siri: "Leading up to 1986 there were only 3 routine vaccines in the United States totaling 7 injections. That's it. That's on the CDC schedule. 3 routine, 7 total injections. There are currently by the way 19 vaccines on the CDC schedule totaling 84 injections if you count Covid vaccine now given annually. Leading up to 86 the amount of liability from those 3 products which were DTP, OPV and MMR were so great that every manufacturer went out of business or stopped making them. So there's only one manufacturer left.

Congress decided instead of forcing what companies always have to do, make a better safer product , instead it passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act that said: "You can keep selling your product even though it causes harm, you don't need to make a better and safe product."

But the original sin wasn't just that. It was that it also gave the immunity for any product going forward. The differential I think that is caused and how clinical trials are conducted, how regulatory agencies treat these these products, they really view themselves as partners of manufacturers."