KANGAROO COURTS OF DELAWARE: Restitution Demanded: $140 billion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE
JULY 8, 2024
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS TITLE 28 US CODE 2254
[Sui Juris PETITIONER, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard]
vs.
[United States District Court of Delaware Judge Gregory B. Williams, United States District Court of Delaware Clerk of Court Randall C. Lohan; Delaware Supreme Court Justice Abigail M. LeGrow, Justice Karen L. Valihura, Justice Gary F. Traynor, Justice N. Christopher Griffiths, Superior Court Judge Eric M. Davis and Judge Danielle J. Brennan and other Complicit Participants]

KANGAROO COURTS OF DELAWARE

Restitution Demanded: $140 billion

WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS BY SUI JURIS PETITIONER, ANDREW HAMILTON PRITCHARD, BENEFICIARY IN EQUITY/EXECUTOR OF 9 SYLVESTER COURT, NORWALK, CONNECTICUT PURSUANT TO TITLE 28 US CODE 2254 AS ALL OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE LEGAL REMEDIES ARE EXHAUSTED.

ENEMY: SEIZURE, OATH DENIED, NO AUTHORITY, AND TREASON…

United States District Court of Delaware Judge Gregory B. Williams, United States District Court of Delaware Clerk of Court Randall C. Lohan; Delaware Supreme Court Justice Abigail M. LeGrow, Justice Karen L. Valihura, Justice Gary F. Traynor, Justice N. Christopher Griffiths, Superior Court Judge Eric M. Davis and Judge Danielle J. Brennan are the “ENEMY” (TITLE 50 US CODE 2204) OF THE US CONSTITUTION, THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND, AS DEFINED BY THE JUDICIARY ACT OF 1789; AND COMPLICIT PARTICIPANTS WILLFULLY ADMINISTER “DOMESTIC TERRORISM” (TITLE 18 US CODE 2331) TO JOSEPH B. ELAD, THE SUI JURIS PLAINTIFF, AND “WE THE PEOPLE” OF AMERICA.

PREAMBLE

Delaware’s Judges are an ENEMY of the People of Delaware and America. Money and power at any cost is what feeds this ENEMY. This Claim is to starve the ENEMY of what it desires most.

I, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, demand the charges below be executed by the proper Authority of “We the People”, and demand Restitution for “We the People” in the amount of $140,000,000,000 (1,400,000 Delaware Corporations X $100,000).

Traitor United States District Court of Delaware Judge Gregory B. Williams and Traitor United States District Court of Delaware Clerk of Court Randall C. Lohan Fraudulently changed the Plaintiff’s application to the Court from the Box checked “Administrative Procedures Act” to “Civil Rights” altering the position of immunity for a judge; willfully disregarded an Administrative Default Judgment; committed Fraud upon the Court in the Order of Dismissal; and Fraud upon the Court to bury/hide the Writ of Habeas Corpus by Sui Juris Petitioner, Andrew Hamilton Pritchard, by referring to it as the Plaintiff’s Habeas Corpus.
Please note: Traitor Gregory B. Williams was charged with felony acts in the Habeas Corpus; thus, cannot hear/rule on it, Canon 2. Nemo Judex in Causa Sua; “no man can be judge in his own case.”
The lawless Traitors are hiding all their crimes via tribunals without authority, not an Article III Court as demanded.
Please Note: 1998 US Tobacco Settlement $206 Billion, Alex Jones $1.5 Billion (26 families).
Cooper v. Aaron, 358 U.S. 1, 78 S. Ct. 1401 (1958)

Note: Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States wars against that Constitution and engages in acts in violation of the supreme law of the land. The judge is engaged in acts of treason. The U.S. Supreme Court has stated that "no state legislator or executive or judicial officer can war against the Constitution without violating his undertaking to support it". See also In Re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (188); U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 L. Ed. 2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L. Ed 257 (1821).

Marbury v. Madison, 5 US 137, (1803)

"The Constitution of these United States is the supreme law of the land. Any law that is repugnant to the Constitution is null and void of law."

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. JARKESY, JR., 603 U. S. (June 27, 2024)

That is why the Constitution built “high walls and clear distinctions” to safeguard individual liberty. Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm, Inc., 514 U. S. 211, 239 (1995). Ones that ensure even the least popular among us has an independent judge and a jury of his peers resolve his case under procedures designed to ensure a fair trial in a fair forum. In reaffirming all this today, the Court hardly leaves the SEC without ample powers and recourse. The agency is free to pursue all of its charges against Mr. Jarkesy. And it is free to pursue them exactly as it had always done until 2010: In a court, before a judge, and with a jury. With these observations, I am pleased to concur.

Axon Enterprise, Inc. v. FTC, 143 S. Ct. 890 (2023) Nos. 21-86 and 21-1239 (April 14, 2023),

"Cases involving ... deprivations or transfers of life, liberty, or property constitute a core of cases that ... MUST be resolved by Article III courts—not executive adjudicators dressed up as courts".

United States v. Throckmorton, 98 US 61 (1878)

“There is no question of the general doctrine that fraud vitiates the most solemn contracts, documents, and even judgments”.

Justice Warren E. Burger, (1907-1995) Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court (1969-1986)
"... ours is a sick profession marked by incompetence, lack of training, misconduct and bad manners. Ineptness, bungling, malpractice, and bad ethics can be observed in court houses all over this country every day ... these incompetents have a seeming unawareness of the fundamental ethics of the profession. ... the harsh truth is that ... we may well be on our way to a society, overrun by hordes of lawyers, hungry as locusts, and brigades of judges in numbers never before contemplated."
Please Note: The Complicit Participants operate in tribunals, not Article III courts as demanded and required for the Jurisdiction of the US Constitution, the Supreme Law of the Land, as ratified June 21, 1788.