Debunking Sovereign Citizen Claims: The Misuse of Cruden v. Neale
12 days ago
60
Entertainment
Law and Order
Cruden v. Neale
sovereign citizen
legal myths
debunking
legal education
courtroom drama
Hanna-Barbera
legal misconceptions
historical legal cases
Join us as we unravel the myths and misconceptions surrounding the often misquoted case of Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796). In this video, we explore how sovereign citizens misinterpret this historical case to support their claims of rejecting government authority and legal compliance.
Discover the actual legal implications of Cruden v. Neale, understand the consequences of misinterpreting legal precedents, and learn why accurate legal knowledge is crucial. Our knowledgeable lawyer sets the record straight, ensuring you are well-informed and equipped to debunk these myths.
Subscribe to our channel for more insightful videos on legal myths and truths, and stay empowered with accurate information.
Loading comments...
-
1:25
Legal Landmarks Shorts
21 days agoUnlawful Search or Military Necessity? The Case of US v. Crowley
48 -
1:51
Legal Landmarks Shorts
12 days agoWarner Chappell Music, Inc. v. Nealy: SCOTUS and the Discovery Rule
34 -
59:52
PATRIOT.TV
1 month agoJudicial Overreach and Legal Perspectives
1.46K -
3:27
IronAgeNews
1 month agoEMPOWERING CITIZENS TO HOLD POWER ACCOUNTABLE THROUGH LEGAL ACTION
5 -
9:53
Mrgunsngear
1 month ago $6.00 earnedSupreme Court Rules 9-0 In Favor Of The NRA - Win For 2nd Amendment & 1st Amendment 🇺🇸
8.7K20 -
1:09:29
International Law Community
21 days agoInternational Law Session - June 2024 - Its All About Community
148 -
1:28:47
cricketrb
25 days agoLaw and Discourse Series, Episode 101: Authority Under Scrutiny -People v. Government
3651 -
1:17:34
War Hamster
24 days agoRe-Federalist Ep. 3: Trump's Appeals: Judicial Precedence
1.45K1 -
6:21
Mr. Beat
17 days agoWhen A Dude Sued His Friend to Steal Native American Land | Fletcher v. Peck
195 -
12:03
As Of Late
27 days agoShould legitimate criticism of government be admissible in evidence?
8