Angular Resolution and our World

Angular Resolution and our World
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aVAWQGlXRWg

Bottom up obstruction on a level plane
https://publish.obsidian.md/flatearth/Bottom+up+obstruction+on+a+level+plane

https://publish.obsidian.md/flatearth/Angular+Resolution+and+our+World

Have you ever seen Earth curve and distance dependent angular resolution in the same frame at the same time ? What if they are the same thing?
https://share.descript.com/view/mn9PD7UG6X1

We all know there is an apparent drop proportionate to distance. The mainstream position is that this bottom up obstruction is caused by the geometric physical earth curve. The counter position has always been that his effect is optical in nature, and not due to physical earth curve.

What it comes down to is this: The loss of information at our horizon is either optical, or physical.
If it's physical, things will simply disappear over the horizon.
If it's optical, things will disappear by angular resolution limit of the observer.
We are trying to use math to distinguish which is true.

Our argument:
If earth curve is actually physical, why can I use the values of optical limits of perception to derive the supposed radius of earth to the 8th decimal place?

The loss of information at our horizon is either optical, or physical (or both).

Well lets look at the values we chose to use, and why we chose them.

These are the values we used.
Wavelength = 666 nm
Diameter = 2.16mm

Why did we choose these values?
Well, because they represent the most commonly experienced circumstances of course.
The diameter of the Pupil (typically) ranges from 2-4 nm to 4-8nm, and it narrows the further out you look.

Wavelengths of light vary on a scale, with atmospheric scattering scaling low to high with refraction scaling high to low with the wavelength.
We chose 2.16mm because the furthest field would be most dilated.
We chose orange/red because they are LEAST susceptible to refraction.

Since the angular resolution limit and the expected rate of drop due to distance are two factors that will ALWAYS yield the radius, how can we now conclude that this value is NOT based on optics?

It seems there is now a huge disparity in the amount of evidence for physical curvature VS optical curvature....

I wonder if anyone will ever find any?

I wonder if some glober will present some math to counter the derived the radius with a higher degree of accuracy than 8 decimal places?

I wonder which side is right?

The question is:
Why, when given any 2 values of these 3, you can ALWAYS derive the 3rd?
What sort of relationship does that imply?

#### How the Mean Radius of Earth was Extrapolated from the Limitations of the Human Eye to Invent the "Globe"

This is basic demonstrable scientific information that we all SHOULD have been taught, but weren't - why? Because this is how they created the ILLUSION in our minds...

Yes, this is technical and requires diligent thought - "they" put a lot of effort in hiding the True Cosmology and creating the illusion which so many now believe; it's going to take similar effort to unravel how they did it. We either believe in highly improbable coincidence, or we accept that the following is precisely what they did to fool us.

The Angular Resolution Limit of the human eye is approximately between 0.02deg and 0.03deg. Optical information loss occurs when the angular size of an object is smaller than the Angular Resolution. This angle, at 0.0217062deg, and an assumed light wavelength of 666nm was used to derive the radius of earth. The occultists who gaslighted us love 6's and 9's in their occult numerology** - we had to think like them to figure out what they did - and here it is: The horizon gain for a 6ft observer across 0.0217062deg was inverted as height/information loss across the same angle, and the two angles were used to construct a spheroid/globe with a tilt angle of 0.0434124deg. This angle represents the 6’ drop from a 6’ observer across the average horizon distance of 2.999547 miles, and it was extrapolated near/far to derive the radius of a sphere. See video linked below, (Angular Resolution and Our World), for a more detailed explanation with visuals.

Basically what this is saying is; if you are a 6 foot tall person standing on the shoreline looking out to sea; the horizon would appear at 2.999547 miles in the center of your vision. This is true regardless of Flat or Spheroid earth.

The question is: Is the loss of information (bottom clipping), that we observe at the horizon - is it an optical phenomenon caused by the limitations of our eyes and devices used to view through, OR, is it a physical phenomenon caused by the claimed curvature of earth?

The Answer: By using this known limitation information of the human eye, "they" were able to construct a seemingly realistic "globe" earth model which would appear as such to the untrained observer - knowing at the time, which we assume to be somewhere in the 1800's, that most