Seek justice - An interview with Julian Gillespie

Julian Gillespie is a retired Australian barrister or retired attorney at law (for US audiences), known for his COVID-19 research and advocacy. His work includes seeking to have the provisional approval of COVID-19 vaccines declared legally invalid due to failures to meet regulatory standards. Julian is also a director of Children's Health Defence, Australia
Today we will be focusing our interview on the GMO (genetically modified organism) case and judicial misconduct.

In this episode, we discuss the following:

- Julian explains what the Australian GMO case is about. The case is Dr Julian Fidge v Pfizer, Moderna.
Dr Fidge alleges that the Pfizer and Moderna modRNA Covid-19 “vaccines” are GMO’s according to the definition in the Gene Technology Act 2000. As such, both Pfizer and Moderna are required to apply for a GMO licence with the Office of Gene Technology Regulator, before applying for a provisional licence with the TGA.

They failed to apply for the necessary licences to deal with Genetically Modified Organisms in Australia. This is a serious criminal offence. (see the Quadrant article in the Reference section below).

- There are almost identical definitions for GMOs in South Africa. South Africans were not made aware that these products were GMOs and lawyers there are dealing with this right now.

- The GMO issue is also relevant in the UK and Europe. Julian explains how it works in the USA, which is a little different, but still the same issue. The FDA illegally gave exemptions to both Pfizer and Moderna for the environmental assessments that should have done, re NEPA, and hid the GMO status of these drugs from the American people. See reference section, below, for Julian’s Substack article on this subject, titled “FDA hid GMO status of Covid drugs”. Julian’s team works with colleagues in these countries.

- Julian tells us Astrazeneca DID apply for a GMO licence with the OGTR in Australia. It was granted, and the product leaflet states it is a GMO. But punters weren’t told that. Pfizer and Moderna would have known that Astrazeneca got that licence, they have million dollar teams working on compliance.

- Julian and his team approached 9 labs, both private and public, in Australia, to test Pfizer and Moderna vials for DNA and other contamination. All labs refused to do the testing. He tells us they are all dependent on government funding. Instead, he was forced to send 3 Australian vials to Canada, to Canadian scientist, David Speicher, who did test them. The results are astonishing. They are about to be published, but the preliminary results can be seen in Julian’s Substack article, see Reference section below.
Dr Speicher has confirmed excessive synthetic DNA contamination in the Australian Pfizer vial was over 350 times above per dose limits set by the TGA, and over 200 times above per dose limits for Moderna.

- Julian explains what the DNA limit is that is set by the TGA, 10 ng, and how it was actually set for injection of naked DNA (which our bodies can recognise and destroy). In fact, with these products, this DNA gets a free pass into the human cell because it is protected by the lipid nano particle covering. So this contamination is far worse than anything we have encountered before.

- Julian tells us that scientist, Kevin McKernan and his team , have recently confirmed that this synthetic DNA , enters the nucleus and is integrated into the human genome and is also self replicating.

- As part of the GMO case, Dr Fidge’s team did find out from documents supplied by Pfizer, that Pfizer did have a meeting with the head of the Office of the Gene Technology Regulator in late 2020. The current head is Dr Raj Bhula, and she was the head also in 2020. She told Pfizer “I don’t need to regulate you”. Dr Fidge’s legal team need more details about this, which they would have if the GMO case was heard. (it was dismissed).

- Julian describes what would have been involved in the OGTR process if it had occurred, including an opportunity for public and private PHD’s to comment on the products in public submissions. The public would have been made aware that these products were GMO’s.

- Justice Helen Rofe decided on March 1 this year, 2024, - on that day she dismissed the case. She decided that Dr Fidge had no standing. She decided the case had no prospect for success as Dr Fidge is not “any aggrieved person” for the purpose of the Gene Technology Act 2000.

Julian tells us that this is ridiculous. Dr Fidge had vaccinated himself, he was forced to take the vaccine, and he vaccinated his wife, his children and thousands of neighbours in his country town of Wangaratta, as their local general practitioner. He is very much aggrieved as he was not informed that these products were GMOs.

- Justice Helen Rofe has represented Pfizer at least 5 times in the past as a barrister, before becoming a judge. Also, her family is part of a pharma dynasty. She is known throughout the judiciary as someone who has represented Pfizer. She was the last person who should have been selected for this GMO case. She did not disclose her family connections or her prior Pfizer cases to the plaintiff or his legal team. She is required to do so. Judges always do disclose prior dealings to give legal teams an opportunity to make a submission to have the judge removed from the case.

- Julian points out that there was a Ceremonial sitting of the Full Court To welcome the Honourable Justice Helen Rofe on 6 May 2022, and the Pfizer cases, in which she acted, were mentioned at that sitting. So, the Chief Justice certainly knew.

- The law firm, PJ O’Brien and Associates sent a complaint against her honour Justice Helen Rofe on March 22, 2024, to Chief Justice Mortimer. It asks for the declaration of the decision dated March 1, 2024 to be void ab initio. An order vacating that decision and asks for costs. Also asking for a new hearing date for the Dr Fidge case with a new judge.

- All commonwealth senators and MPS have now received a copy of the complaint against Justice Rofe and are on notice to fulfill their constitutional duties under section 72 (ii). Section 72(ii) of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act. Section 72 is titled “Judges appointment, tenure and renumeration.” It states that the Justices of the High Court shall not be removed except by the Governor General in Council, on an address from both Houses of Parliament, in the same session, praying for such removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.

- Certain Australian MP’s and senators are showing interest in this matter.

- What can Australians do to help? Julian is asking that Australians go to the website that has been created by Children’s Health Defence Australia, www.section72.au

Here they can generate a complaint, via email or a printed letter for their MP, based on their postcode. If the public approach their MP’s and senators in this way, there will be more politicians involved in this complaint.

- Julian’s team also took this material to the Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions in a criminal brief, asking him to prosecute. It firstly went to the Attorney General of Australia, Mark Dreyfus, but there was no answer.

The CDPP replied that the complaint was not properly formatted for court, but didn’t say which part.

- Julian tells us that “Australia is suffering a serious constitutional crisis in respect of a loss of separation of powers concerning covid judicial matters. He discusses the Australian babies case. The court has broken the separation of powers doctrine to protect the executive government (Department of Health).

Websites referenced in the Interview;

- Julian Gillespie’s Substack: Called “Jules on the Beach”. Free to read.

https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/

- The Section 72 website, for generating email, letter, or help with phone call, meeting with your MP and senators. An initiative of Children’s Health Defence, Australia.

www.section72.au

- Quadrant Online. “After Covid: Now it’s the lawyers’ turn.” Augusto Zimmermann & Gabriël Moens.

https://quadrant.org.au/opinion/covid/2024/06/after-covid-now-its-the-lawyers-turn/

- Jules on the Beach Substack article: Law professors Zimmerman and Moens, Quadrant Article.
https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/law-professors-zimmerman-and-moens

- Jules on the Beach Substack article: FDA hid GMO status of Covid drugs.

https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/zee-fda-had-zee-science-but-intentionally

- Jules on the Beach Substack article: Australian DNA contamination confirmed.

https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/australian-dna-contamination-confirmed