Premium Only Content

If Only USCCA Had Done It Right
The United States Concealed Carry Association (USCCA) along with its partner Delta Defense LLC purport to pay their members legal expenses if the member is involved in a use-of force event. Indeed, their sophisticated internet advertising campaigns frequently feature CEO Tim Schmidt assuring the public that "We've got your back!"
In recent years, however, USCCA has refused to meet that apparent obligation to its members. When asked about this the organization has either provided no particularly substantive reasons--e.g., "we just feel we're not obligated to do so"--or has made up an outrageously not credible explanation months after the fact--e.g., "actually that member preferred we not help them."
It is for these reasons that I'm personally unable to recommend USCCA in good faith to anybody seeking legal services coverage in a use-of-force context.
That said, there DO EXIST scenarios in which it would arguably be appropriate for ANY use-of-force legal services company to decline to provide coverage--and we'll explore one of those scenarios in the context of a recent New Mexico Supreme Court decision.
If THIS had been USCCA's explanation for its repeated failure to cover its members, they'd have had a point. Too bad for them, however, that this was NOT their explanation.
Join me LIVE at 11AM ET to discuss!
THERE IS ONLY ONE SELF-DEFENSE "INSURANCE" PROVIDER I TRUST!
There are lots of self-defense "insurance" companies out there. Some are hot garbage. Some have limited resources. Some are simply, in my view, untrustworthy. But there is ONE that I PERSONALLY TRUST to protect myself and my family.
LEARN which ONE I TRUST by clicking HERE:
https://lawofselfdefense.com/trust
Disclaimer - Content is for educational & entertainment purposes only, and does not constitute legal advice. If you are in need of legal advice you must retain competent legal counsel in the relevant jurisdiction.
Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.
-
2:19:14
The Attorney Andrew Branca Show
10 days agoYUGE WIN! Court AFFIRMS Trump's POWER to END Dem THEFT!
2.14K -
2:40:10
DLDAfterDark
6 hours ago $0.13 earnedDLD Live! Feat. Red Dawn Readiness! Glock FRT's - Striker Fire Safety Concerns - ACE Trigger
14.7K1 -
2:40:21
BlackDiamondGunsandGear
5 hours agoAre ALL Striker Fired Pistols UNSAFE? // After Hours Armory
34.6K6 -
6:34:50
SpartakusLIVE
9 hours ago#1 Saturday Spartoons on RUMBLE PREMIUM
106K7 -
1:04:59
Man in America
10 hours ago“Summoning the Demon” — The AI Agenda Is FAR WORSE Than We Know w/ Kay Rubacek
41.2K25 -
2:16:48
Tundra Tactical
8 hours ago $0.08 earned🎯💥 The World’s Okayest Gun Show 🔫😂 | LIVE Tonight on Rumble!
23.9K -
3:36:03
Mally_Mouse
1 day ago🌶️ 🥵Spicy BITE Saturday!! 🥵🌶️- Let's Play: Tower Unite!
49.1K2 -
58:59
MattMorseTV
8 hours ago $1.29 earned🔴Trump just BROKE Newsom.🔴
64.3K80 -
18:14
Her Patriot Voice
8 hours agoWho Is WORSE for NYC: Trump Girl or Socialist?
45.8K33 -
3:39:42
SavageJayGatsby
8 hours agoSpicy Saturday with Mally! | Road to 100 | $300 Weekly Goal for Spicy Bites!
45.7K1