EXPOSED! - Hague Proceedings RIGGED to Deny Return of Abducted Child

FOLLOW + SHARE OUR STORY:
https://linkin.bio/justice4keanu/
(optimized for mobile devices)

HELP US FIGHT THE BASTARDS!
GIVESENDGO: https://www.givesendgo.com/justice4keanu

GOFUNDME: https://www.gofundme.com/justicefor4keanu

VENMO DIRECT: http://www.venmo.com/darcher007

MEDIA INQUIRIES:
I have over 80 hours worth of Court hearings recorded, 7000+ pages of court documents, and much more. Only liars fear the truth.

CONTACT:
darcherbond@protonmail.com.

DESCRIPTION:
One of the biggest questions I’ve been asked is how in the world my Hague Convention application was denied for the return of my abducted son. If granted, Care Proceedings would have never taken place since Hague overrides Care.


If his mother HAD unlawfully removed him from the country, AND a U.S. Judge supported this, PLUS issued an Emergency Custody Order for sole custody, AND a felony warrant was issued against the mother for felony kidnapping… then how could we possibly lose? Well, this is why.

I was represented by Jon Sampson who focused ONLY on whether or not the U.S. Court was “seized” by the issue of custody. Going all-in on a singular argument is always a mistake, but in Sampson's case it appears to have been intentional sabotage.

He refused to bring on the U.S. Judge as a witness, who stood by all my points, insisting that it “wasn’t necessary”. I argued that hearing directly from the U.S. Judge would be the easiest way to clear things up. Sampson refused to even contact the Oklahoma Court. Nobody did!

Meanwhile the Local Authority, led by Aiden Vine, brought on an “expert” witness from Oklahoma who (clearly) was anything but. Her experience wasn’t even close to sufficiently relevant and she didn’t know jack about my custody case.
Which is why she was selected.

Sampson’s line of argument wasn’t wrong, for the record, BUT he should have also argued that because my son had been ABDUCTED, an automatic return order was warranted.

When Justice Lieven asked Mr Sampson where his points were for this in his skeleton arguments, stressing that it was extremely important, he admitted he neglected to include it. Why was he so sloppy? He wasn’t.

He purposefully skipped that argument and brought forward zero witnesses. He plainly took a knee despite 20+ years of experience as a well-regarded solicitor in family law.
He knew better.

Before my case, Sampson already had a Queen’s Counsel (QC) designation. After my case he was promoted to King’s Counsel (KC) while Aiden Vine (his senior who already had KC) further received a prestigious award.

While all VERY suspicious, this alone still wouldn’t be sufficient evidence to conclude collusion to rig the Hague trial took place.
Except, as it turns out… wait for it… they BOTH WORKING FOR THE SAME LAW FIRM THE ENTIRE TIME. Did they think I wouldn’t find out about this brazen conflict of interest? Well, I did. And now everyone else knows, too.

Mr Sampson also inexplicably refused to file an appeal after we lost, claiming it “wasn’t possible to win” and then dropped me entirely as a client. Gee, I wonder why?

Welcome to Family Court in Coventry, UK. A criminal organization with zero principles, zero values, and only the facade of professionalism, where families are destroyed and children are trafficked for profit.

And zero humility despite how many indisputable examples of corruption I’ve made public so far.

And I’m not done yet…

ACTION:
Let Harcourt Family Law know how you feel!

PHONE: 020 7353 6961
EMAIL: clerks@harcourtchambers.co.uk
WEB: https://www.harcourtchambers.co.uk/barrister/jonathan-sampson-kc/

#familycourt #familycourtcorruption #fypシ゚viral シ #fyptiktok #circus #uk #justicelieven #coventrycity #coventrycitycouncil #childabduction #givemebackmyson #enoughisenough #harcourt #familylaw #conflictofinterest #lawsuitincoming #fathersrights #fathersandsons #hague #conventions #childrenfirst #priorities #soundoffreedom #humanrightsviolation #savethechildren #justice4keanu