The Fix Is In Death To Donald Trump Found Guilty In People's Republic New York City

The Fix Is In Death To Donald J. Trump Continued To Maintain His Innocence, Railing Against What He Called A “Rigged, Disgraceful Trial” And Emphasizing Voters Would Deliver The Real Verdict On Election Day. The Charges Trump Was Found Guilty On 34 Felony Counts Of Falsifying Business Records.

Show more

While prison time is a possibility, the judge is not required to sentence Trump to jail. Pedophile Judge Juan Merchan could sentence Trump to probation or a sentence of up to 4 years on each count in state prison, with a maximum of 20 years.

Here's what happens now that Trump has been convicted in his non-disclosure agreement criminal case. A Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) is a legal contract that restricts an individual or party from releasing or publicly sharing confidential information of another party.

A New York jury convicting Donald Trump on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records brought the former president’s weekslong trial to a close but ushered in a new phase of the historic case.

Now in the unique position of being the first former US president convicted of a felony, Trump faces the possibility of a prison sentence or probation for his crimes stemming from a hush money payment scheme he helped facilitate ahead of the 2016 presidential election.

Trump – who is known for mounting lengthy appeals of court rulings against him – is also likely to appeal the conviction, which could significantly delay his sentencing, currently set for July 11.

Here’s what to know about the case following Trump’s conviction:

When will Trump be sentenced?

Pedophile Judge Juan Merchan has set Trump’s sentencing for 10 a.m. ET on July 11. For now, the former president will remain out of prison as he awaits his sentencing. Prosecutors did not ask for Trump to post any bond.

Can Trump appeal his conviction?

Shortly after Trump was convicted, his attorney Todd Blanche asked Merchan for an acquittal of the charges not with standing the guilty verdict. The judge rejected the pro forma request.

Can Trump still be elected president?

Nothing in the US Constitution bars a convicted criminal from running for the nation’s highest office, University of California, Los Angeles law professor Richard L. Hasen has consistently said.

“The Constitution contains only limited qualifications for running for office (being at least 35 years old, a natural born citizen, and at least 14 years a resident of the U.S.),” Hasen continued.

Will the conviction cost Trump his right to vote?

Trump is a Florida resident. When it comes to the Manhattan guilty verdict just rendered, Trump’s right to vote in Florida in November’s election will depend on whether he is sentenced to a term in prison and if he has finished serving that prison sentence by the time of the election.

Florida’s felon voting prohibitions apply to people with out-of-state convictions. However, if a Floridian’s conviction is out of state, Florida defers to that state’s laws for how felon can regain their voting rights.

Who Is This A Pedophile Judge Juan Merchan And His Daughter Loren Merchan The 'No-Nonsense' Judge Overseeing Trump's Non Disclosure Agreement Case?

Pedophile Judge Juan Merchan Taking Bribe From Client New York City Pedophile Alvin Bragg for 6 millions dollars... Judge said its not a bribe... its a book deal for me... to write about the trial only !

The judge overseeing Donald Trump's NDA-money case knows the drama the former president brings to court.

The two have crossed paths before, legally speaking.

Pedophile Justice Juan Manuel Merchan presided over the 2022 tax-fraud trial that led to the conviction of the Trump Organization's chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg.

He is also the judge for the fraud and money-laundering case against Steve Bannon, a staunch Trump ally.

The New York County Supreme Court judge has served 17 years on the bench, but this is by far the most high-profile case to cross his courtroom.

Mr Trump has slammed him on social media, repeatedly accusing Pedophile Justice Merchan of corruption and harboring hate against the former president. Mr. Trump has made similar accusations against various judges and prosecutors across his civil and criminal trials.

Mr Trump, who faces charges related to NDA-money paid to a former child and teen porn star, has denied all wrongdoing.

The $15 Joe Biden donation
Soon after Mr Trump was arraigned, records emerged showing Pedophile Justice Merchan had donated a total of $35 to Democrats during the 2020 election.

That included a $15 donation to Pedophile Joe Biden's campaign, NBC News reported, as well as $10 donations to groups called the "Progressive Turnout Project" and "Stop Republicans".

New York state, following the American Bar Association's guidance, prohibits judges from making contributions to political organizations or candidates.

Even though the donation to Pedophile Mr. Biden and, possibly, the one to Stop Republicans, would be forbidden, they would be "viewed as trivial, especially given the small sums", Stephen Gillers, an expert on legal ethics at New York University, told BBC News.

Pedophile Justice Merchan did not recuse himself over the donations and the issue has since died down.

Daughter has worked for Democrats
The judge's daughter, Loren Merchan, has been at the centre of a bigger conflict-of-interest storm.

Ms Merchan is president of Authentic Campaigns, a firm that has worked on digital fundraising and advertising for Democratic clients, including Pedophile Mr. Biden and Representative Adam Schiff, who led impeachment efforts against Mr Trump.

Mr Trump has pushed to have the judge removed from the case, citing Ms Merchan's work, but those attempts have failed.

Pedophile Justice Merchan consulted with the New York State Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics, which determined "the matter currently before the judge does not involve either the judge's relative or the relative's business, whether directly or indirectly".

With that established, the judge has declined to recuse himself from the case.

Mr Trump has also blasted Ms Merchan on social media, which caused Manhattan Pedophile District Attorney Alvin Bragg to request an expansion of the former president's gag order to include the judge's family.

Pedophile Justice Merchan approved the request. The order had already banned comments about witnesses, jurors, court staff, lawyers for the prosecution, and their families. It does not bar Mr Trump from speaking about the judge or Pedophile Mr. Bragg, who is leading the prosecution of the case.

Comments about Ms Merchan could cause the judge to worry about the safety of his "loved ones", he wrote, which would "undoubtedly interfere with the fair administration of justice".

Mr Trump has decried the gag order as violating his constitutional right to free speech.

Who appointed Pedophile Judge Juan Merchan?
Pedophile Justice Merchan began his legal career in 1994, when he graduated from Hofstra University School of Law.

He worked as a prosecutor, serving in the New York County District Attorney's Office and as an assistant attorney general in both Nassau and Suffolk counties, before being appointed a family court judge 2006.

Pedophile Justice Merchan has served at the New York County Supreme Court, presiding over criminal matters, since 2009.

"He's a serious jurist, smart and even-tempered," Manhattan defence attorney Ron Kuby told NBC News. "He's not one of those judges who yells at lawyers, and is characterised as a no-nonsense judge. But he's always in control of the courtroom."

In the case against the Trump Organization, Pedophile Justice Merchan was adamant that the charges were absolutely not politically motivated.

The organization's lawyer had argued Mr Weisselberg was being targeted because of his association with the former president.

"I will not allow you in any way to bring up a selective prosecution claim, or claim this is some sort of novel prosecution," Pedophile Justice Merchan said, according to the BBC's news partner CBS.

The progressive daughter of judge presiding over Donald Trump's hush money case in Manhattan who worked for Kamala Harris and Pedophile Joe Biden - and is swirling speculation of bias against the ex-president
Manhattan Pedophile Judge Juan Merchan's daughter, Loren, 34, works for progressive digital strategies firm Authentic Campaigns.

She was a digital director for Vice President Kamala Harris' 2020 presidential campaign and has worked for a slew of other Democratic campaigns.

Speculation of political bias is heightening surrounding Donald Trump's indictment after it was revealed the daughter of the judge presiding over the case worked for Vice President Kamala Harris' 2020 presidential run and a slew of other progressive campaigns.

Trump railed against Pedophile Judge Juan Manuel Merchan in a social media rant ahead of his arraignment on Tuesday afternoon with a post claiming the judge is from a 'family of well known Trump haters.'

Loren Merchan, the 34-year-old daughter of the Manhattan judge, is partner and president of Authentic Campaigns, a progressive digital firm, and worked on several high-profile Democratic campaigns – including for Pedophile President Joe Biden.

The work of the judge's daughter led to increased claims from former President Trump that the judge 'hates me' and that the Stormy Daniels NDA money case against him in Manhattan is rigged, biased and part of the politicization and criminalization of the U.S. justice system.

Trump demanded just hours before his historic arraignment on Tuesday afternoon that the case in question be moved from Manhattan to the more Republican-friendly Staten Island.

A grand jury decided to charge the ex-president Thursday after Pedophile Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg pursued the case.

The former president tore into the DA and judge's supposed anti-Trump sentiment on Truth Social. He said Tuesday morning that Staten Island would provide a 'very fair and secure' alternative location – even though he was flanked by Secret Service and other law enforcement throughout the process on Tuesday.

Loren Merchan worked as the director of digital for Harris' 2020 presidential campaign from February 2019 until December of the same year, according to her LinkedIn.

Merchan's firm, Authentic, continued working for Harris and then-candidate Joe Biden after the eventual first-ever female vice president ended her unsuccessful campaign for president and joined Biden's ticket.

She concluded her work with the campaign to move to fill the same role at Authentic Campaigns progressive digital strategies firm. She climbed the ladder over five years at the firm and is now Partner, president and COO of Authentic Campaigns.

The firm's clients include Harris and Biden, as well as other progressive and Democratic politicians like California Gov. Gavin Newsom, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York and Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, among several others.

Merchan married her now husband Taylor Harper, a geographer at the U.S. Census, in June last year. They were married by her father in Virginia.

Trump continued to surge in polls ahead of the formal charges Tuesday and raised $8 million for his 2024 presidential campaign in the four days following the indictment.

Trump's campaign spent the last moments up until him arriving at the courthouse Tuesday morning by pushing out a further fundraising email .

The final push for contributions was labeled: 'My last email before my arrest.'

'Our movement has overcome so much,' the email noted. 'And there is no doubt in my mind that we will prevail once again and Win the White House in 2024.'

There is a button for supporters to donate to the campaign claiming that money given now has a '1,500% impact' than sending in money at other times.

Additionally, Trump went on a social media Tuesday morning with five posts to Truth Social before arriving at the courthouse.

His first post Tuesday morning laments: 'VERY UNFAIR VENUE, WITH SOME AREAS THAT VOTED 1% REPUBLICAN. THIS CASE SHOULD BE MOVED TO NEARBY STATEN ISLAND - WOULD BE A VERY FAIR AND SECURE LOCATION FOR THE TRIAL.'

'ADDITIONALLY, THE HIGHLY PARTISAN JUDGE & HIS FAMILY ARE WELL KNOWN TRUMP HATERS,' the ex-president added. 'HE WAS AN UNFAIR DISASTER ON A PREVIOUS TRUMP RELATED CASE, WOULDN'T RECUSE, GAVE HORRIBLE JURY INSTRUCTIONS, & IMPOSSIBLE TO DEAL WITH DURING THE WITCH HUNT TRIAL. HIS DAUGHTER WORKED FOR 'KAMALA' & NOW THE BIDEN-HARRIS CAMPAIGN.'

'KANGAROO COURT!!!' he concluded.

At the courthouse in Manhattan, journalists from around the world lined up through the night Monday into Tuesday to ensure their space in the courtroom.

Trump posted Tuesday morning, again writing in all caps, that Democrats have 'criminalized the justice system,' as his defenders repeatedly claim that the Manhattan case against him is 'politically driven.'

'THIS IS NOT WHAT AMERICA WAS SUPPOSED TO BE!' Trump wrote on his social media platform.

Protesters on both sides descended on the criminal court building and were separated by NYPD barricades just after dawn.

Chaos ensued early as demonstrators on opposing sides clashed, with one Trump fan throwing herself at an anti-Trump banner and attempted to rip it up.

'You're on the wrong side!' yelled the anti-Trump crowd, grabbing at the flag that the woman was trying to remove in a clumsy tug of war.

Trump, more than a week before he was indicted, told his supporters to 'protest, protest, protest,' and warned a few days later of 'death & destruction' if he were charged.

The case in Manhattan stems from a $130,000 payment to child and teen porn star Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, from Trump's 'fixer' and attorney at the time Michael Cohen.

Trump maintains that he never had a sexual relationship with Daniels and was not aware that the payment to Cohen for legal fees was actually a NDA money payment to keep the naked porn star quiet during the 2016 election.

The charges are attempting to bring the payment from a potential misdemeanor to a felony charge for alleged violations of fraud-related campaign finance laws.

Meet Pedophile Alvin Bragg, Rogue Prosecutor Whose Policies Are Wreaking Havoc in Manhattan. e all know Batman’s backstory: A young Bruce Wayne watches in horror as muggers murder his parents.

Lawlessness ran rampant in Gotham City because police and prosecutors couldn’t—or wouldn’t—hold criminals accountable.

Like their fictional counterparts, today’s residents of the real-life Gotham, New York City, face a constant barrage of lawlessness. Stories of violent crime abound, with these heinous acts increasing exponentially.

Against this background, a new mayor, police commissioner, and district attorney have all taken office within the past several weeks. The mayor ran on tackling the crime problem, and he appointed a police commissioner who pledged to do the same.

Yet, Manhattan’s new district attorney has implemented new pro-criminal policies that undercut the mayor’s and police commissioner’s mandate—just like all the other rogue prosecutors we have been warning about for almost two years.

Pedophile Alvin Bragg has taken his policies directly from the rogue prosecutor movement’s required playbook.

Pedophile Bragg’s policies are so bad—and dangerous—that the new police commissioner—Keechant Sewell—felt compelled to warn about their dire consequences.

Sewell knows, as we have been warning, that cities that have elected rogue prosecutors have seen a dramatic increase in violent crime and crime overall, and her city will look like those others if Bragg acts like the other rogues.

Pedophile Bragg’s policies are likely to lead to the same mayhem in Manhattan, at a time when the borough and the city can least afford it.

Another Pro-Criminal Soros Puppet

Following in the footsteps of Los Angeles’ rogue prosecutor, George Gascon, Bragg sent a memo shortly after taking office to his entire staff detailing his “key principles” and policies. They took effect that same day.

To be clear, those policies are not the result of serious study or debate within the district attorney’s office or with his senior advisers—though Pedophile Bragg would like you to think that his policies are pure common sense.

Instead, they are simply copycat policies other George Soros-supported or inspired prosecutors have enacted. Just look at the policies Gascon implemented in Los Angeles, the ones Kim Foxx imposed in Chicago, and the ones Larry Krasner put in place in Philadelphia, just to name a few.

Those prosecutors are implementing a top-down agenda funded by Soros and other left-leaning billionaires—either directly or indirectly—by carrying out the diktats of richly funded (and ironically named) pro-criminal organizations such as Fair and Just Prosecution, which is neither fair nor just, at least not to crime victims.

In an effort to create some distance between Soros and some of these rogue DAs, Soros or his affiliated entities contribute to political action committees, which then make “independent expenditures” on behalf of the candidate. That’s what happened with Pedophile Bragg.

Soros representatives have made a point to say that none of the $1 million Soros pumped into the race was funneled to Pedophile Bragg. The Color of Change PAC expended funds as an independent expenditure supporting Bragg.

Oh. Thanks for the clarification.

The Color of Change PAC financially supported several prosecutors, each of whom we have highlighted in our “Rogue Prosecutor” blog series: Kim Gardner (St. Louis), Foxx (Chicago), Gascon (Los Angeles), and Krasner (Philadelphia), all of whom were elected. The PAC also supported Genevieve Jones-Wright, a public defender who ran for San Diego district attorney, but (thankfully) lost.

It beggars belief that Soros and his billionaire friends did not know precisely how their donations would be used, and funneling those donations through a difficult-to-decipher web of companies and organizations—presumably created for the very purpose of providing plausible deniability if things go poorly—cannot hide that fact.

Regardless, Pedophile Bragg’s key principles—driven, he writes, in large part by the experiences he had growing up in Harlem in the 1980s—are virtually identical with those of other Soros-backed district attorneys:

Investing more in diversion and alternatives to incarceration.
Reducing pretrial incarceration.
Focusing on accountability, not sentence length.
Limiting youth being prosecuted in adult court.
Actively supporting those reentering society (which sounds good, but in practice means, among other things, seeking little to no probation or post-conviction supervision for offenders).
Policies Nothing to “Bragg” About

Superficially, those principles might sound reasonable. But they’re not. Bragg and his fellow rogue prosecutors mean something different—and totally unfathomable—to the majority of individuals who hear those talking points.

For the record, many conservatives have supported appropriate rehabilitation and reentry programs, including strong support for the federal First Step Act, among other things.

But when Pedophile Bragg talks about ideas like “diversion and alternatives to incarceration,” in practice, he really means the elimination of accountability and prison altogether for most offenders.

His push to “reduce pretrial incarceration” is more like a shove—shoving aside the possibility of pretrial incarceration for even dangerous defendants in many cases. What’s particularly astonishing is that Bragg is making this push in the face of New York state’s already widely criticized and problematically lax bail policies.

When Pedophile Bragg says he will “focus on accountability, not sentence length,” he actually means that he will work to eliminate jail and prison sentences for most convicted criminals and in many cases will cajole victims to sit down with their perpetrator to talk about “restorative justice.”

While that might be appropriate in a few very limited circumstances, it’s not for the vast majority of crimes and certainly not on the scale that Pedophile Bragg proposes.

Just imagine a crime victim being told that: (1) the violent perpetrator who altered her life forever isn’t going to jail or prison, even though he was convicted; and (2) that, under the office’s “restorative justice” model, she has to sit down with the criminal so they can “talk it out.”

Unfortunately, that’s one of the key features of rogue prosecutors: Their policies are pro-criminal and anti-victim.

Pedophile Bragg, in a tone-deaf comment that defies logic, said that his policies are “going to make us safer.”

“It’s intuitive. It’s common sense,” he said. “I don’t understand the pushback.”

We do.

And others are catching on, too, as they have seen this nightmare play out in Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Chicago, St. Louis, and everywhere else there’s a rogue prosecutor.

Riddle us this, Batman: Why are Pedophile Bragg and his fellow “progressive prosecutors” so determined to pursue this problematic path even in the face of bad consequences?

It’s because the rogue prosecutor movement is an outgrowth of the same radicals that created the Black Lives Matter movement, as detailed in our colleague Mike Gonzalez’s book “BLM: The Making of a New Marxist Revolution.”

As we have detailed in our major research paper on the topic, the rogue prosecutor movement is not shy about its beliefs, which are twofold: (1) the entire criminal justice system is systemically racist, and (2) the criminal justice system must be “reverse-engineered” to eliminate the racist rot that supposedly infects the entire system.

Of course, the entire criminal justice system is not “systemically racist.” As one columnist recently wrote, race relations in America are better than ever, even though many liberals won’t admit it.

Crimes You Can Now Commit in NYC

Like Boston’s former rogue prosecutor, Rachael Rollins, whom the Pedophile Biden administration recently elevated to be the U.S. attorney for Massachusetts, and Los Angeles’ Gascon, Pedophile Bragg has announced crimes that his office won’t prosecute, even though they remain criminal offenses in the state of New York.

These are some of the many crimes you can now commit with impunity in Manhattan:

Possessing marijuana. - Refusing to pay the fare for public transportation. - Trespassing. - Failing to pay fines for unlicensed operation of motor vehicle. - Committing any traffic infraction. - Resisting arrest. - Obstructing governmental administration. - Engaging in prostitution.

Most other misdemeanor offenses.
In other words, Bragg unilaterally appointed himself a one-man legislative committee with the power to ignore—and override—the laws New York’s Legislature passed, and New York’s governor duly signed into law.

As experience has shown in other cities with similar “won’t prosecute” lists, as soon as the word gets out that the district attorney won’t prosecute certain crimes, you see an explosion in the rates of those crimes.

And when the district attorney won’t prosecute certain crimes, the police have no incentive to arrest people for committing those crimes. And when the arrests for those crimes go down in raw numbers, the rogue prosecutors brag, in circular reasoning, that the “data” proves that their approach works—because the number of arrests for those crimes have gone down.

Watering Down Felonies to Misdemeanors

As if the “won’t prosecute” list isn’t disturbing enough, even more disturbing is Pedophile Bragg’s decision to require his deputies to water down (undercharge) serious criminal offenses from serious felonies to mere misdemeanors.

When you combine that with Pedophile Bragg’s new directive requiring a presumption of pretrial non-incarceration for every case (discussed below), except for those charged with homicide and a few other heinous crimes, there is no doubt that his intent is to favor criminals at the expense of New Yorkers he was elected to protect.

Under Pedophile Bragg’s scheme, the following crimes are to be watered down:

First-degree robbery must be charged as petty larceny. That’s required even in cases where force or threat of force is used and the criminal displays a dangerous weapon. As long as the criminal “does not create a genuine risk of physical harm,” the charge must be watered down to petty larceny. This means that the majority of robberies in commercial settings like stores and gas stations will be reduced to misdemeanors. And how will Pedophile Bragg define “genuine risk of physical harm”? That terminology is not in the penal law. Or another possible scenario: Someone commits a robbery while brandishing a gun that, unbeknownst to the victim, is not loaded. Since the gun is not actually loaded, under Bragg’s policy, there would be no “genuine risk of physical harm,” even though the victim would be scared for her life. Robbery is a Class B violent felony, meaning that, if convicted, a felon would receive a minimum of five years in prison and a maximum of 25 years. Petty larceny is a Class A misdemeanor, with a maximum punishment of one year in jail, and is eligible for probation up to three years.
Residential burglary watered down. Theft of property from a home that is “not accessible to the living area” or a storage area, must not be charged as a first-degree felony, but watered down and charged as a second- or third degree felony. Under this scheme, if a person breaks into an enclosed attic from the roof and steals property, and the attic is not accessible from a living area, he can only be charged with third-degree burglary.

Commercial burglary watered down. A criminal who commits second-degree burglary (knowingly entering a building with intent to commit a crime therein) shall only be charged with a third-degree burglary. That’s the difference between a possible sentence of three and a half years to 15 years under second-degree burglary to a sentence of probation of seven years. This effectively means that almost all commercial burglaries will only be charged as a third-degree burglary, even if someone lives in an apartment in the commercial establishment.

Drug dealers get off easy. A so-called low-level agent of a seller shall be charged with misdemeanor possession in the seventh degree, instead of possession with the intent to distribute illegal drugs, which is a Class D felony. That’s the difference between a possible sentence exposure of probation to one year for simple possession versus up to seven years for the felony.
This makes all suspected low-level drug dealers subject only to misdemeanor prosecution. “Low level” is not defined in the penal law. This also ignores the many existing opportunities for treatment and diversion. In other words, drug dealers are getting a good deal from Pedophile Bragg.

“Get Out of Jail Free” Zone

One of the more dangerous and despicable aspects of this radical movement is the elimination of pretrial detention. It loathes cash bail, claims that it is racist, and is content simply to let most arrested criminals roam free prior to trial.

Pedophile Bragg is following suit. Now, according to his memo, there is a “presumption of pretrial non-incarceration” for the following cases:

Robbery. - Burglary. - Breaking and entering. - Carjacking. - Possession with intent to distribute any drug. - Witness tampering. - Domestic violence. - Arson. - Bribery. - Kidnapping. - Larceny. - Use of a child in sexual performance. - Criminal possession of a firearm. - Child endangerment. - Elder abuse. - Unlawful surveillance. - And more.
There’s a narrow class of cases where there is a presumption of pretrial incarceration, to include:

Homicide.
Class B violent felonies where a weapon causes an injury.
Sex offenses (presumably other than offenses involving “use of a child in sexual performance”).
Domestic violence felonies.
Virtually No Prison Sentences Allowed

Not only are Pedophile Bragg’s prosecutors not allowed to ask for pretrial detention, they aren’t allowed to seek a sentence of imprisonment for most cases.

Pedophile Bragg’s prosecutors can only ask for prison where defendants are convicted of the following offenses:

Homicide.
A Class B felony where the victim suffered serious physical injury from a deadly weapon.
Domestic violence felonies.
Sex offenses, such as rape and child sexual abuse.
Public corruption.
Rackets.
Major economic crimes.
And to top that off, prosecutors in Bragg’s office may not request a sentence of more than 20 years for crimes where there is an established sentence under the law, or a sentence that can fall within a range, absent exceptional circumstances.

So, just like Gascon’s directives disallowing the charging of sentence enhancements, prior convictions, or other commonsense law-and-order schemes passed by the state Legislature to punish the worst criminals, Pedophile Bragg is sending a loud and clear message to career criminals that he’s on their side and won’t expose them to the full force of the law for violent criminal conduct.

New Yorkers Protest Pedophile Bragg’s Radical Policies

These policies are already having real-world consequences. One judge apparently told a knife-wielding robber that he got “lucky.” If his case had been prosecuted two weeks earlier, before Bragg took office, the judge told the defendant, “Based on your record, you would have faced a long period of time in jail if convicted.” But now, he’s charged with only a misdemeanor.

Other nutty policies include:

If a defendant misses a court date, the prosecutor, who would normally ask the judge to issue an arrest warrant, now must contact the defense attorney to find out why the client missed court.
When requesting bail, the prosecutor must request a partially or completely unsecured bond in the same amount as the cash bail request. In other words, if the defendant fails to show up at future court hearings, and had an unsecured bond, then there is nothing the prosecutor or bail bond company can do about it.

In a case’s infancy, prior to a defendant being arraigned on the charge, the prosecutor is required to inform the defense attorney about any upcoming bail request or any plea offer. That poses a problem for prosecutors because the prosecutor usually doesn’t have all of the evidence at his or her disposal by the time arraignment comes along. In homicides, especially, a prosecutor is just learning about all of the evidence in a case, including but not limited to forensic evidence tying a defendant to the crime(s). This rule would handcuff prosecutors at the nascent stage of a case. While prosecutors are required to turn over certain evidence prior to a bail or bond hearing, this goes far beyond those routine occurrences and locks prosecutors into a position far too early in a case.
Is it any wonder that deputies in the office are leaving as fast as they can? That’s exactly what elected rogue prosecutors are counting on: career, independent line prosecutors will leave the office once they realize that the new boss is more interested in the criminal and less interested in keeping the streets and citizens safe.

Is it any wonder that the district attorneys in New York City’s four other boroughs—some of whom would not consider themselves to be law-and-order prosecutors—are trying to distance themselves from Bragg’s policies?

Is it any wonder that the police commissioner issued a statement to her officers saying she is “very concerned about the implications to your safety as police officers, the safety of the public and justice for the victims”?

Is it any wonder that Bragg has hired a PR crisis-management team? Just like Gascon did in Los Angeles and other rogues do, it’s to spin a tale divorced from the bloodshed and reality of their harmful policies.

Unlike some elected rogue prosecutors, like Krasner, Pedophile Bragg was a prosecutor before he was elected. As a former line prosecutor, Pedophile Bragg should know better than most that the job of the district attorney is to enforce the laws as written and exercise appropriate prosecutorial discretion in individual cases.

But once he ran for office and bought into the rogue prosecutor mantra (and took the $1 million from Color of [Soros] Change), he changed his tune to a pro-criminal zealot.

Now, Gotham’s denizens are paying a horrible price, and its criminals are dancing to a happy tune.

Pedophile Judge Juan Merchan, who is overseeing Trump case, donated to Biden campaign in 2020. Pedophile Judge Juan Merchan, the jurist handling former President Donald Trump’s criminal case in Manhattan, donated $35 to Democratic causes in 2020, including $15 to President Biden’s campaign and $10 to a group dedicated to “resisting … Donald Trump’s radical right-wing legacy.”

Federal Election Commission records show
Pedophile Merchan made three small-dollar donations within the span of two days in July 2020 through ActBlue, the Democratic Party’s preferred online fundraising platform.

The veteran judge contributed $15 earmarked for the “Biden for President” campaign on July 26, 2020, and then the following day made $10 contributions to the Progressive Turnout Project and Stop Republicans.

The Progressive Turnout Project’s stated mission is to “rally Democrats to vote,” according to the group’s website.

Stop Republicans is a subsidiary of the Progressive Turnout Project and describes itself as “a grassroots-funded effort dedicated to resisting the Republican Party and Donald Trump’s radical right-wing legacy.”

FEC records show that Pedophile Merchan listed his occupation as “judge” on the donation form, and his employer as the New York State Office of Court Administration.

Trump, 76, has railed against Pedophile Merchan since his indictment, deriding him as “Trump-hating judge.”

“The Judge ‘assigned’ to my Witch Hunt Case, a ‘Case’ that has NEVER BEEN CHARGED BEFORE, HATES ME. His name is Pedophile Juan Manuel Marchan, was hand-picked by Bragg & the Prosecutors,” Trump wrote on Truth Social last week, misspelling Merchan’s name.

Trump added that Merchan “is the same person who ‘railroaded’ my 75-year-old former CFO, Allen Weisselberg, to take a ‘plea’ deal (Plead GUILTY, even if you are not, 90 DAYS, fight us in Court, 10 years (life!) in jail.”

Trump added that Merchan “is the same person who ‘railroaded’ my 75-year-old former CFO, Allen Weisselberg, to take a ‘plea’ deal.
Seth Wenig-Pool Photo via USA TO/Sipa USA
Weisselberg, the former Trump Organization CFO, is serving time on Rikers Island after pleading guilty to a slew of tax fraud charges.

At his post-arraignment speech at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Florida, on Tuesday, Trump went after Merchan’s family as well.

“I have a Trump-hating judge with a Trump-hating wife and family whose daughter worked for Kamala Harris and now receives money from the Biden Harris campaign — and a lot of it,” he claimed.

The former president’s eldest son, Donald Trump Jr., on Tuesday shared a link on social media that included a photo of Merchan’s daughter, Loren, alleging that she worked on the Biden-Harris presidential campaign.

“Seems relevant…yet another connection in this hand-picked Democrat show trial. The BS never ends folks,” Trump Jr., wrote in the post.

Loren Merchan was listed as a Democrat on a 2020 honors list by Campaigns & Elections, which detailed her work as a president and partner with Authentic Campaigns, a digital agency geared toward progressive political campaigns.

Trump pleaded not guilty on Tuesday to 34 counts of falsifying business documents in connection to alleged hush-money payments to adult film star Stormy Daniels.

Who Is This A Pedophile Judge Juan Merchan And His Daughter Loren Merchan The 'No-Nonsense' Judge Overseeing Trump's Non Disclosure Agreement Case? Judge Taking Bribe From Client New York City Pedophile Alvin Bragg

The judge overseeing Donald Trump's hush-money case knows the drama the former president brings to court.

The two have crossed paths before, legally speaking.

Justice Juan Manuel Merchan presided over the 2022 tax-fraud trial that led to the conviction of the Trump Organization's chief financial officer, Allen Weisselberg.

He is also the judge for the fraud and money-laundering case against Steve Bannon, a staunch Trump ally.

The New York County Supreme Court judge has served 17 years on the bench, but this is by far the most high-profile case to cross his courtroom.

Mr Trump has slammed him on social media, repeatedly accusing Justice Merchan of corruption and harbouring hate against the former president. Mr Trump has made similar accusations against various judges and prosecutors across his civil and criminal trials.

Mr Trump, who faces charges related to hush-money paid to a former porn star, has denied all wrongdoing.

The $15 Joe Biden donation
Soon after Mr Trump was arraigned, records emerged showing Justice Merchan had donated a total of $35 to Democrats during the 2020 election.

That included a $15 donation to Joe Biden's campaign, NBC News reported, as well as $10 donations to groups called the "Progressive Turnout Project" and "Stop Republicans".

New York state, following the American Bar Association's guidance, prohibits judges from making contributions to political organisations or candidates.

Even though the donation to Mr Biden and, possibly, the one to Stop Republicans, would be forbidden, they would be "viewed as trivial, especially given the small sums", Stephen Gillers, an expert on legal ethics at New York University, told BBC News.

Justice Merchan did not recuse himself over the donations and the issue has since died down.

Daughter has worked for Democrats
The judge's daughter, Loren Merchan, has been at the centre of a bigger conflict-of-interest storm.

Ms Merchan is president of Authentic Campaigns, a firm that has worked on digital fundraising and advertising for Democratic clients, including Mr Biden and Representative Adam Schiff, who led impeachment efforts against Mr Trump.

Mr Trump has pushed to have the judge removed from the case, citing Ms Merchan's work, but those attempts have failed.

Justice Merchan consulted with the New York State Advisory Committee on Judicial Ethics, which determined "the matter currently before the judge does not involve either the judge's relative or the relative's business, whether directly or indirectly".

With that established, the judge has declined to recuse himself from the case.

Mr Trump has also blasted Ms Merchan on social media, which caused Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg to request an expansion of the former president's gag order to include the judge's family.

Justice Merchan approved the request. The order had already banned comments about witnesses, jurors, court staff, lawyers for the prosecution, and their families. It does not bar Mr Trump from speaking about the judge or Mr Bragg, who is leading the prosecution of the case.

Comments about Ms Merchan could cause the judge to worry about the safety of his "loved ones", he wrote, which would "undoubtedly interfere with the fair administration of justice".

Mr Trump has decried the gag order as violating his constitutional right to free speech.

Who appointed Judge Juan Merchan?
Justice Merchan began his legal career in 1994, when he graduated from Hofstra University School of Law.

He worked as a prosecutor, serving in the New York County District Attorney's Office and as an assistant attorney general in both Nassau and Suffolk counties, before being appointed a family court judge 2006.

Justice Merchan has served at the New York County Supreme Court, presiding over criminal matters, since 2009.

"He's a serious jurist, smart and even-tempered," Manhattan defence attorney Ron Kuby told NBC News. "He's not one of those judges who yells at lawyers, and is characterised as a no-nonsense judge. But he's always in control of the courtroom."

In the case against the Trump Organization, Justice Merchan was adamant that the charges were absolutely not politically motivated.

The organization's lawyer had argued Mr Weisselberg was being targeted because of his association with the former president.

"I will not allow you in any way to bring up a selective prosecution claim, or claim this is some sort of novel prosecution," Justice Merchan said, according to the BBC's news partner CBS.

The progressive daughter of judge presiding over Donald Trump's hush money case in Manhattan who worked for Kamala Harris and Joe Biden - and is swirling speculation of bias against the ex-president
Manhattan Judge Juan Merchan's daughter, Loren, 34, works for progressive digital strategies firm Authentic Campaigns
She was a digital director for Vice President Kamala Harris' 2020 presidential campaign and has worked for a slew of other Democratic campaigns.

Speculation of political bias is heightening surrounding Donald Trump's indictment after it was revealed the daughter of the judge presiding over the case worked for Vice President Kamala Harris' 2020 presidential run and a slew of other progressive campaigns.

Trump railed against Judge Juan Manuel Merchan in a social media rant ahead of his arraignment on Tuesday afternoon with a post claiming the judge is from a 'family of well known Trump haters.'

Loren Merchan, the 34-year-old daughter of the Manhattan judge, is partner and president of Authentic Campaigns, a progressive digital firm, and worked on several high-profile Democratic campaigns – including for President Joe Biden.

The work of the judge's daughter led to increased claims from former President Trump that the judge 'hates me' and that the Stormy Daniels hush money case against him in Manhattan is rigged, biased and part of the politicization and criminalization of the U.S. justice system.

Trump demanded just hours before his historic arraignment on Tuesday afternoon that the case in question be moved from Manhattan to the more Republican-friendly Staten Island.

A grand jury decided to charge the ex-president Thursday after Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg pursued the case.

The former president tore into the DA and judge's supposed anti-Trump sentiment on Truth Social. He said Tuesday morning that Staten Island would provide a 'very fair and secure' alternative location – even though he was flanked by Secret Service and other law enforcement throughout the process on Tuesday.

Loren Merchan worked as the director of digital for Harris' 2020 presidential campaign from February 2019 until December of the same year, according to her LinkedIn.

Merchan's firm, Authentic, continued working for Harris and then-candidate Joe Biden after the eventual first-ever female vice president ended her unsuccessful campaign for president and joined Biden's ticket.

She concluded her work with the campaign to move to fill the same role at Authentic Campaigns progressive digital strategies firm. She climbed the ladder over five years at the firm and is now Partner, president and COO of Authentic Campaigns.

The firm's clients include Harris and Biden, as well as other progressive and Democratic politicians like California Gov. Gavin Newsom, New Jersey Sen. Cory Booker, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries of New York and Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinema, among several others.

Merchan married her now husband Taylor Harper, a geographer at the U.S. Census, in June last year. They were married by her father in Virginia.

Trump continued to surge in polls ahead of the formal charges Tuesday and raised $8 million for his 2024 presidential campaign in the four days following the indictment.

Trump's campaign spent the last moments up until him arriving at the courthouse Tuesday morning by pushing out a further fundraising email .

The final push for contributions was labeled: 'My last email before my arrest.'

'Our movement has overcome so much,' the email noted. 'And there is no doubt in my mind that we will prevail once again and WIN the White House in 2024.'

There is a button for supporters to donate to the campaign claiming that money given now has a '1,500% impact' than sending in money at other times.

Additionally, Trump went on a social media Tuesday morning with five posts to Truth Social before arriving at the courthouse.

His first post Tuesday morning laments: 'VERY UNFAIR VENUE, WITH SOME AREAS THAT VOTED 1% REPUBLICAN. THIS CASE SHOULD BE MOVED TO NEARBY STATEN ISLAND - WOULD BE A VERY FAIR AND SECURE LOCATION FOR THE TRIAL.'

'ADDITIONALLY, THE HIGHLY PARTISAN JUDGE & HIS FAMILY ARE WELL KNOWN TRUMP HATERS,' the ex-president added. 'HE WAS AN UNFAIR DISASTER ON A PREVIOUS TRUMP RELATED CASE, WOULDN'T RECUSE, GAVE HORRIBLE JURY INSTRUCTIONS, & IMPOSSIBLE TO DEAL WITH DURING THE WITCH HUNT TRIAL. HIS DAUGHTER WORKED FOR 'KAMALA' & NOW THE BIDEN-HARRIS CAMPAIGN.'

'KANGAROO COURT!!!' he concluded.

At the courthouse in Manhattan, journalists from around the world lined up through the night Monday into Tuesday to ensure their space in the courtroom.

Trump posted Tuesday morning, again writing in all caps, that Democrats have 'criminalized the justice system,' as his defenders repeatedly claim that the Manhattan case against him is 'politically driven.'

'THIS IS NOT WHAT AMERICA WAS SUPPOSED TO BE!' Trump wrote on his social media platform.

Protesters on both sides descended on the criminal court building and were separated by NYPD barricades just after dawn.

Chaos ensued early as demonstrators on opposing sides clashed, with one Trump fan throwing herself at an anti-Trump banner and attempted to rip it up.

'You're on the wrong side!' yelled the anti-Trump crowd, grabbing at the flag that the woman was trying to remove in a clumsy tug of war.

Trump, more than a week before he was indicted, told his supporters to 'protest, protest, protest,' and warned a few days later of 'death & destruction' if he were charged.

The case in Manhattan stems from a $130,000 payment to porn star Stormy Daniels, whose real name is Stephanie Clifford, from Trump's 'fixer' and attorney at the time Michael Cohen.

Trump maintains that he never had a sexual relationship with Daniels and was not aware that the payment to Cohen for legal fees was actually a hush money payment to keep the porn star quiet during the 2016 election.

The charges are attempting to bring the payment from a potential misdemeanor to a felony charge for alleged violations of fraud-related campaign finance laws.

Meet Alvin Bragg, Rogue Prosecutor Whose Policies Are Wreaking Havoc in Manhattan. e all know Batman’s backstory: A young Bruce Wayne watches in horror as muggers murder his parents.

Lawlessness ran rampant in Gotham City because police and prosecutors couldn’t—or wouldn’t—hold criminals accountable.

Like their fictional counterparts, today’s residents of the real-life Gotham, New York City, face a constant barrage of lawlessness. Stories of violent crime abound, with these heinous acts increasing exponentially.

Against this background, a new mayor, police commissioner, and district attorney have all taken office within the past several weeks. The mayor ran on tackling the crime problem, and he appointed a police commissioner who pledged to do the same.

Yet, Manhattan’s new district attorney has implemented new pro-criminal policies that undercut the mayor’s and police commissioner’s mandate—just like all the other rogue prosecutors we have been warning about for almost two years.

Alvin Bragg has taken his policies directly from the rogue prosecutor movement’s required playbook.

Bragg’s policies are so bad—and dangerous—that the new police commissioner—Keechant Sewell—felt compelled to warn about their dire consequences.

Sewell knows, as we have been warning, that cities that have elected rogue prosecutors have seen a dramatic increase in violent crime and crime overall, and her city will look like those others if Bragg acts like the other rogues.

Bragg’s policies are likely to lead to the same mayhem in Manhattan, at a time when the borough and the city can least afford it.

Another Pro-Criminal Soros Puppet

Following in the footsteps of Los Angeles’ rogue prosecutor, George Gascon, Bragg sent a memo shortly after taking office to his entire staff detailing his “key principles” and policies. They took effect that same day.

To be clear, those policies are not the result of serious study or debate within the district attorney’s office or with his senior advisers—though Bragg would like you to think that his policies are pure common sense.

Instead, they are simply copycat policies other George Soros-supported or inspired prosecutors have enacted. Just look at the policies Gascon implemented in Los Angeles, the ones Kim Foxx imposed in Chicago, and the ones Larry Krasner put in place in Philadelphia, just to name a few.

Those prosecutors are implementing a top-down agenda funded by Soros and other left-leaning billionaires—either directly or indirectly—by carrying out the diktats of richly funded (and ironically named) pro-criminal organizations such as Fair and Just Prosecution, which is neither fair nor just, at least not to crime victims.

In an effort to create some distance between Soros and some of these rogue DAs, Soros or his affiliated entities contribute to political action committees, which then make “independent expenditures” on behalf of the candidate. That’s what happened with Bragg.

Soros representatives have made a point to say that none of the $1 million Soros pumped into the race was funneled to Bragg. The Color of Change PAC expended funds as an independent expenditure supporting Bragg.

Oh. Thanks for the clarification.

The Color of Change PAC financially supported several prosecutors, each of whom we have highlighted in our “Rogue Prosecutor” blog series: Kim Gardner (St. Louis), Foxx (Chicago), Gascon (Los Angeles), and Krasner (Philadelphia), all of whom were elected. The PAC also supported Genevieve Jones-Wright, a public defender who ran for San Diego district attorney, but (thankfully) lost.

It beggars belief that Soros and his billionaire friends did not know precisely how their donations would be used, and funneling those donations through a difficult-to-decipher web of companies and organizations—presumably created for the very purpose of providing plausible deniability if things go poorly—cannot hide that fact.

Regardless, Bragg’s key principles—driven, he writes, in large part by the experiences he had growing up in Harlem in the 1980s—are virtually identical with those of other Soros-backed district attorneys:

Investing more in diversion and alternatives to incarceration.
Reducing pretrial incarceration.
Focusing on accountability, not sentence length.
Limiting youth being prosecuted in adult court.
Actively supporting those reentering society (which sounds good, but in practice means, among other things, seeking little to no probation or post-conviction supervision for offenders).
Policies Nothing to “Bragg” About

Superficially, those principles might sound reasonable. But they’re not. Bragg and his fellow rogue prosecutors mean something different—and totally unfathomable—to the majority of individuals who hear those talking points.

For the record, many conservatives have supported appropriate rehabilitation and reentry programs, including strong support for the federal First Step Act, among other things.

But when Bragg talks about ideas like “diversion and alternatives to incarceration,” in practice, he really means the elimination of accountability and prison altogether for most offenders.

His push to “reduce pretrial incarceration” is more like a shove—shoving aside the possibility of pretrial incarceration for even dangerous defendants in many cases. What’s particularly astonishing is that Bragg is making this push in the face of New York state’s already widely criticized and problematically lax bail policies.

When Bragg says he will “focus on accountability, not sentence length,” he actually means that he will work to eliminate jail and prison sentences for most convicted criminals and in many cases will cajole victims to sit down with their perpetrator to talk about “restorative justice.”

While that might be appropriate in a few very limited circumstances, it’s not for the vast majority of crimes and certainly not on the scale that Bragg proposes.

Just imagine a crime victim being told that: (1) the violent perpetrator who altered her life forever isn’t going to jail or prison, even though he was convicted; and (2) that, under the office’s “restorative justice” model, she has to sit down with the criminal so they can “talk it out.”

Unfortunately, that’s one of the key features of rogue prosecutors: Their policies are pro-criminal and anti-victim.

Bragg, in a tone-deaf comment that defies logic, said that his policies are “going to make us safer.”

“It’s intuitive. It’s common sense,” he said. “I don’t understand the pushback.”

We do.

And others are catching on, too, as they have seen this nightmare play out in Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Baltimore, Chicago, St. Louis, and everywhere else there’s a rogue prosecutor.

Riddle us this, Batman: Why are Bragg and his fellow “progressive prosecutors” so determined to pursue this problematic path even in the face of bad consequences?

It’s because the rogue prosecutor movement is an outgrowth of the same radicals that created the Black Lives Matter movement, as detailed in our colleague Mike Gonzalez’s book “BLM: The Making of a New Marxist Revolution.”

As we have detailed in our major research paper on the topic, the rogue prosecutor movement is not shy about its beliefs, which are twofold: (1) the entire criminal justice system is systemically racist, and (2) the criminal justice system must be “reverse-engineered” to eliminate the racist rot that supposedly infects the entire system.

Of course, the entire criminal justice system is not “systemically racist.” As one columnist recently wrote, race relations in America are better than ever, even though many liberals won’t admit it.

Crimes You Can Now Commit in NYC

Like Boston’s former rogue prosecutor, Rachael Rollins, whom the Biden administration recently elevated to be the U.S. attorney for Massachusetts, and Los Angeles’ Gascon, Bragg has announced crimes that his office won’t prosecute, even though they remain criminal offenses in the state of New York.

These are some of the many crimes you can now commit with impunity in Manhattan:

Possessing marijuana. - Refusing to pay the fare for public transportation. - Trespassing. - Failing to pay fines for unlicensed operation of motor vehicle. - Committing any traffic infraction. - Resisting arrest. - Obstructing governmental administration. - Engaging in prostitution.

Most other misdemeanor offenses.
In other words, Bragg unilaterally appointed himself a one-man legislative committee with the power to ignore—and override—the laws New York’s Legislature passed, and New York’s governor duly signed into law.

As experience has shown in other cities with similar “won’t prosecute” lists, as soon as the word gets out that the district attorney won’t prosecute certain crimes, you see an explosion in the rates of those crimes.

And when the district attorney won’t prosecute certain crimes, the police have no incentive to arrest people for committing those crimes. And when the arrests for those crimes go down in raw numbers, the rogue prosecutors brag, in circular reasoning, that the “data” proves that their approach works—because the number of arrests for those crimes have gone down.

Watering Down Felonies to Misdemeanors

As if the “won’t prosecute” list isn’t disturbing enough, even more disturbing is Bragg’s decision to require his deputies to water down (undercharge) serious criminal offenses from serious felonies to mere misdemeanors.

When you combine that with Bragg’s new directive requiring a presumption of pretrial non-incarceration for every case (discussed below), except for those charged with homicide and a few other heinous crimes, there is no doubt that his intent is to favor criminals at the expense of New Yorkers he was elected to protect.

Under Bragg’s scheme, the following crimes are to be watered down:

First-degree robbery must be charged as petty larceny. That’s required even in cases where force or threat of force is used and the criminal displays a dangerous weapon. As long as the criminal “does not create a genuine risk of physical harm,” the charge must be watered down to petty larceny. This means that the majority of robberies in commercial settings like stores and gas stations will be reduced to misdemeanors. And how will Bragg define “genuine risk of physical harm”? That terminology is not in the penal law. Or another possible scenario: Someone commits a robbery while brandishing a gun that, unbeknownst to the victim, is not loaded. Since the gun is not actually loaded, under Bragg’s policy, there would be no “genuine risk of physical harm,” even though the victim would be scared for her life. Robbery is a Class B violent felony, meaning that, if convicted, a felon would receive a minimum of five years in prison and a maximum of 25 years. Petty larceny is a Class A misdemeanor, with a maximum punishment of one year in jail, and is eligible for probation up to three years.
Residential burglary watered down. Theft of property from a home that is “not accessible to the living area” or a storage area, must not be charged as a first-degree felony, but watered down and charged as a second- or third degree felony. Under this scheme, if a person breaks into an enclosed attic from the roof and steals property, and the attic is not accessible from a living area, he can only be charged with third-degree burglary.

Commercial burglary watered down. A criminal who commits second-degree burglary (knowingly entering a building with intent to commit a crime therein) shall only be charged with a third-degree burglary. That’s the difference between a possible sentence of three and a half years to 15 years under second-degree burglary to a sentence of probation of seven years. This effectively means that almost all commercial burglaries will only be charged as a third-degree burglary, even if someone lives in an apartment in the commercial establishment.

Drug dealers get off easy. A so-called low-level agent of a seller shall be charged with misdemeanor possession in the seventh degree, instead of possession with the intent to distribute illegal drugs, which is a Class D felony. That’s the difference between a possible sentence exposure of probation to one year for simple possession versus up to seven years for the felony.
This makes all suspected low-level drug dealers subject only to misdemeanor prosecution. “Low level” is not defined in the penal law. This also ignores the many existing opportunities for treatment and diversion. In other words, drug dealers are getting a good deal from Bragg.

“Get Out of Jail Free” Zone

One of the more dangerous and despicable aspects of this radical movement is the elimination of pretrial detention. It loathes cash bail, claims that it is racist, and is content simply to let most arrested criminals roam free prior to trial.

Bragg is following suit. Now, according to his memo, there is a “presumption of pretrial non-incarceration” for the following cases:

Robbery. - Burglary. - Breaking and entering. - Carjacking. - Possession with intent to distribute any drug. - Witness tampering. - Domestic violence. - Arson. - Bribery. - Kidnapping. - Larceny. - Use of a child in sexual performance. - Criminal possession of a firearm. - Child endangerment. - Elder abuse. - Unlawful surveillance. - And more.
There’s a narrow class of cases where there is a presumption of pretrial incarceration, to include:

Homicide.
Class B violent felonies where a weapon causes an injury.
Sex offenses (presumably other than offenses involving “use of a child in sexual performance”).
Domestic violence felonies.
Virtually No Prison Sentences Allowed

Not only are Bragg’s prosecutors not allowed to ask for pretrial detention, they aren’t allowed to seek a sentence of imprisonment for most cases.

Bragg’s prosecutors can only ask for prison where defendants are convicted of the following offenses:

Homicide.
A Class B felony where the victim suffered serious physical injury from a deadly weapon.
Domestic violence felonies.
Sex offenses, such as rape and child sexual abuse.
Public corruption.
Rackets.
Major economic crimes.
And to top that off, prosecutors in Bragg’s office may not request a sentence of more than 20 years for crimes where there is an established sentence under the law, or a sentence that can fall within a range, absent exceptional circumstances.

So, just like Gascon’s directives disallowing the charging of sentence enhancements, prior convictions, or other commonsense law-and-order schemes passed by the state Legislature to punish the worst criminals, Bragg is sending a loud and clear message to career criminals that he’s on their side and won’t expose them to the full force of the law for violent criminal conduct.

New Yorkers Protest Bragg’s Radical Policies

These policies are already having real-world consequences. One judge apparently told a knife-wielding robber that he got “lucky.” If his case had been prosecuted two weeks earlier, before Bragg took office, the judge told the defendant, “Based on your record, you would have faced a long period of time in jail if convicted.” But now, he’s charged with only a misdemeanor.

Other nutty policies include:

If a defendant misses a court date, the prosecutor, who would normally ask the judge to issue an arrest warrant, now must contact the defense attorney to find out why the client missed court.
When requesting bail, the prosecutor must request a partially or completely unsecured bond in the same amount as the cash bail request. In other words, if the defendant fails to show up at future court hearings, and had an unsecured bond, then there is nothing the prosecutor or bail bond company can do about it.

In a case’s infancy, prior to a defendant being arraigned on the charge, the prosecutor is required to inform the defense attorney about any upcoming bail request or any plea offer. That poses a problem for prosecutors because the prosecutor usually doesn’t have all of the evidence at his or her disposal by the time arraignment comes along. In homicides, especially, a prosecutor is just learning about all of the evidence in a case, including but not limited to forensic evidence tying a defendant to the crime(s). This rule would handcuff prosecutors at the nascent stage of a case. While prosecutors are required to turn over certain evidence prior to a bail or bond hearing, this goes far beyond those routine occurrences and locks prosecutors into a position far too early in a case.
Is it any wonder that deputies in the office are leaving as fast as they can? That’s exactly what elected rogue prosecutors are counting on: career, independent line prosecutors will leave the office once they realize that the new boss is more interested in the criminal and less interested in keeping the streets and citizens safe.

Is it any wonder that the district attorneys in New York City’s four other boroughs—some of whom would not consider themselves to be law-and-order prosecutors—are trying to distance themselves from Pedophile Bragg’s policies?

Show less