CNN: The prosecution fell way short of proving its case against Trump.

CNN: The prosecution fell way short of proving its case against Trump. WATCH

"The burden of proof is an important one to remind everyone it's on the prosecution. Right. They need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Donald Trump broke the law. And you think after listening to all of this, they fell way short? How?

"Because let's start with reasonable doubt. What is reasonable doubt? It's not simply a doubt based upon reason.

Any time a human being needs to make an important decision in life, if you have enough information, for example, doctor says you need open heart surgery. Doc, go ahead and schedule. I don't have a reasonable doubt. Conversely, if I say I appreciate it, but I need a second opinion, I need more information, that is having a reasonable doubt. There is reasonable doubt all over this case.

Where is Keith Schiller? Where is Alan Weisselberg? How did Michael Cohen get away with stealing $30,000? Hold a pity party for him. Made $4 million on this. Thought he'd be chief of staff. He's a fixer. If the plumber comes to my house to fix my leak, I could be home. That doesn't mean I know how he's doing it and what it's taking to be fixed. Stormy Daniels, let's hold a pity party for her. Why do we need to know whether or not the former president wore a condom or not?

It's simply about did the former president know that books his records, false entries for legal fees. Michael Cohen was his lawyer. Did he intend to cover up the election or to protect his family? It's everywhere."