Global Takeover? WHO's Pandemic Treaty Could Override National Laws!

Warning: WHO Global Coup in May!

As the World Health Organization (WHO) prepares for a crucial vote on the Pandemic Treaty and changes to the International Health Regulations (IHR), concerns about global governance and national sovereignty are reaching a fever pitch. The assembly will take place in Geneva from May 27 to June 1. If approved, these changes would transition the WHO from an advisory body to an authoritative entity capable of enforcing its directives globally, effectively establishing a world government run by unelected bureaucrats.

Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the first WHO Director General without a medical degree, has previously served on the board of GAVI, a Bill Gates organization. Given that Bill Gates' organizations are the second-largest funders of the WHO, Gates has significant influence over global health policies, a fact underscored during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite his lack of medical credentials, Gates advocated for widespread vaccination, asserting that life couldn't return to normal until nearly all 7.5 billion people received the COVID-19 vaccine. Gates has since acknowledged that these vaccines do not prevent infection and has remained silent on their safety concerns, despite widespread assurances of their safety and efficacy.

Dr. Meryl Nass, founder of Door to Freedom, will provide live coverage of the WHO meetings starting May 27 at 2 PM EST. According to the site, 24 US governors and 22 state attorneys general have signed letters opposing the WHO treaties. Dr. Nass also highlights that eleven countries, including Belarus, Cuba, North Korea, and others, have informed the UN General Assembly of their refusal to support the WHO's Pandemic Preparedness initiatives.

In Europe, the Netherlands' lower house of Parliament has instructed its government to delay or vote against the WHO proposals. Slovakia has declared it will not sign the current drafts of either document, and Croatia's new majority party is against the WHO’s Pandemic Preparedness Plan. Italy’s Senator Borghi has stated that Italy will vote “No” on the treaty, and there are ten more months to reject the IHR amendments.

The WHO’s Relentless Power Grab

The world is closely watching as delegates gather for the 77th World Health Assembly in Geneva to discuss global health governance. However, there is significant opposition from various countries, including Japan, Germany, Slovakia, and the United States.

Meryl Nass and James Corbett, co-hosts of 'Good Morning CHD,' will return to CHD.TV to present a final warning about the implications of the May 2024 meeting. They will discuss the critical points related to the WHO's proposals and their potential impact on global governance and individual freedoms.

Assassinations and Suspicious Deaths

Dr. Nass explains that on May 10, Slovakian Prime Minister Robert Fico publicly opposed the WHO Pandemic Treaty. Just ten days later, Tedros visited Slovakia, urging Fico not to break the consensus. Five days after that visit, Fico was shot in the abdomen and is now in critical condition, marking the first assassination attempt on a European leader in two decades. The new government led by populist Robert Fico won a mandatory confidence vote amid this turmoil.

Similarly, the President and Foreign Minister of Iran, a country that opposed the WHO Pandemic Treaty, died in a helicopter crash on May 20. Iranians believe the deaths were orchestrated. Additionally, Tanzanian President John Magufuli, who exposed fraudulent PCR tests, died of a heart attack at age 61.

Debunking the Claims

Reuters previously addressed claims that five leaders who died in office were killed for opposing COVID-19 vaccines. The unfounded assertion includes the deaths of Jovenel Moise of Haiti, John Magufuli of Tanzania, Hamed Bakayoko of Ivory Coast, Ambrose Dlamini of eSwatini, and Pierre Nkurunziza of Burundi. Despite widespread speculation, there is no evidence linking their deaths to their stance on COVID-19 policies.

Conclusion

The upcoming vote on the WHO's Pandemic Treaty and IHR changes raises critical questions about transparency, global health governance, and the preservation of national sovereignty. The involvement of influential figures like Bill Gates and organizations like the CIA in global health initiatives underscores the need for accountability and clear boundaries. The WHO's shift from advisory to authoritative status could have profound implications, making it imperative for specialized, transparent, and accountable entities to manage public health.