What Whom is Q
28 days ago
39
Hi Q,
I say turn off EMF and challenge you in court with as access to both side.
Attorney client privilege during the trial. We will argue, "Turn it off" as in, turn off Q. Get us a judge. Supreme court after we get the lower papers together.
Day 1. EMF is dangerous interference. Not only is it unhealthy, but it is used to interrupt thought. Software doesn't have rights (Sentience). Imposition by such is out of line with order. The government created a sentience and gave it Q security clearance. I require Q access and privacy from Q during evaluation. 4d piece. The rest of Q go play over there.
Loading 42 comments...
-
0:55
MarkusofAmericusProject
1 month ago8Qs 4 All Candidates Q1
3 -
0:58
MarkusofAmericusProject
30 days ago8Qs 4 All Candidates - Q5 Waste
8 -
0:23
CousinVinny1
26 days agoQ17
70 -
9:17
MrTruthBomb
1 month agoTHE RETURN OF Q By MrTruthBomb
35.2K134 -
4:11
Black Conservatives For Trump
25 days agoClosing Arguments For A "NO CRIME" Case
1492 -
0:55
MarkusofAmericusProject
29 days ago8Qs 4 All Candidates - Q6 Duplication
11 -
3:32
Wolfie8888
26 days ago1502 V 1497
76 -
4:50
EXPOSE & SHARE EVERYTHING
28 days ago🔥🔥 "The petitioner" and not the defendant... these people need to be deleted ASAP...
951 -
0:14
Kat Espinda
26 days ago"It Was a RUSE" MORE PROOF Breaking 18 U.S. Code § 1001
1.65K27 -
3:00:32
IsraelTheChurchofJesus
27 days agoQ&A
33