Premium Only Content

Class 7 Part 2: Uncertainty & Probability Theory: The Logic of Science: Logic Intuition Check
Class 7: Uncertainty & Probability Theory: The Logic of Science: Logic Intuition Check
This is ONLY Part 2. Rumble only allows 2 GB files, so I had to break this into two.
Lesson 7: Logic Intuition Check.
I'm starting to get some good questions. Some of them by folks who have clearly had training in probability and physics before.
These people will have the most difficult time following this Class.
For the very excellent reason that we, all of us, when confronted with new information seek to put it into buckets in our mind, if you will, buckets which we have formed over many years. This is entirely natural, and even helpful.
Unless those buckets are the wrong shape. Which if you have had training about "random variables", "p-values", and the like, are, I insist, wrongly shaped. Not always, and not always badly, but to some extent.
Review!
We have done so far, and ONLY what we have done, is this:
1. Posed some logical questions: could logic handle uncertainty?
2. Demonstrated the crucial differences between local and necessary truths;
3. That having a philosophy is inescapable, and that belief was an act, a choice;
4. That logic was a mix of subjectivity---picking premises and proposition of interest---and objectivity---rigorously showing the connection between the premises and POIs. That logic was only about those connections; that logic was therefore a matter of the mind and not things;
5.That induction and intuition were of at least five different kinds, and that induction provides our most certain knowledge (induction provides us with the rules of logic, for instance, as do axioms, for which there is no and can be no empirical proof); and that there was no escaping faith (at least that your senses were working properly at times);
6. That probability could be represented as a mathematical function, and we discovered the form of that function (Bayes's Theorem); that certainty was given by the number 1, and falsity by the number 0.
All questions will be answered in the following Monday's lecture.
Written lecture: https://www.wmbriggs.com/post/51635/
https://wmbriggs.substack.com/
Permanent class page: https://www.wmbriggs.com/class/
-
2:19:50
Akademiks
4 hours agoDrake Lawsuit Dismissed by Federal Judge. What does it Mean.... for the boy.
122K9 -
1:01:38
DeVory Darkins
13 hours ago $47.31 earnedSchumer suffers humiliation as critics applaud Trump's historic peace deal with Tim Pool
106K56 -
56:09
Steven Crowder
19 hours agoBlack Fatigue is Real and I Told Them Why | Black & White on the Gray Issues
512K2.21K -
2:05:36
Inverted World Live
11 hours agoSaint's Tomb Opened for First Time in 800 Years for Ancient Ritual | Ep. 121
98.2K18 -
2:43:30
TimcastIRL
8 hours agoNY AG Indicted For FRAUD, Faces 30 Years In Prison, $1 MILLION FINE | Timcast IRL
223K107 -
1:09:16
Man in America
18 hours agomRNA 2.0: This Frightening Tech Can Target Your BRAIN Using Biological Post Codes
57.9K22 -
1:28:31
The Charlie Kirk Show
8 hours agoTHOUGHTCRIME Ep. 100 — Turning Point Halftime? Potatoes and Katie Porter? Hasan the Dog Shocker?
116K59 -
6:33:19
SpartakusLIVE
9 hours agoNEW Update, NEW Meta || Zombies Mode is BACK - Smokes NURFED
69.5K5 -
13:10
Robbi On The Record
8 hours ago $9.05 earnedThe War on Christians | China’s Surveillance & Nigeria’s Killing Fields
48.4K36 -
1:24:49
Flyover Conservatives
1 day agoYour Home Just Became a Healing Room — The Truth About Red Light & Med Bed - Jonathan Otto | FOC Show
47K8