KNOW THIS Machine Gun Law NOW + FUTURE NFA , GCA 1968, FOPA Hughes Amendment 1986, Transferables

KNOW THIS Machine Gun Law NOW + FUTURE NFA , GCA 1968, FOPA Hughes Amendment 1986, Transferables

#machineguns #2ndamendment #scotus

THOUSANDS of Machine Guns DESTROYED! Why? Firearms FFL Expert Michael Kwiatkowski
https://youtu.be/FaKNkjWo2l0

Other courts have relied on Heller to reject Second Amendment challenges to laws proscribing machine gun possession. United States v. One (1) Palmetto State Armory PA-15 Machinegun Receiver/Frame, 822 F.3d 136, 141-44 (3rd Cir. 2016) (finding “the Second Amendment does not protect the possession of machine guns. They are not in common use for lawful purposes.”); Hollis v. Lynch, 827 F.3d 436, 449-51 (5th Cir. 2016) (finding that machineguns do not receive Second Amendment protection because they are dangerous and unusual); Hamblen v. United States, 591 F.3d 471, 473-74 (6th Cir. 2009) (finding the right to keep and bear arms does not authorize an unlicensed individual to possess unregistered machine guns for personal use); United States v. Fincher, 538 F.3d 868, 873-74 (8th Cir. 2008) (finding machineguns are not in common use by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes and therefore fall within the category of dangerous and unusual weapons that the government can prohibit)

Post-Bruen, courts have consistently held that Second Amendment protections do not extend to machineguns. See Cox v. United States, 2023 WL 4203261, at *7 (D. Alaska June 27, 2023) (rejecting argument that machine guns are in common use for self-defense); United States v. Kazmende, 2023 WL 3872209, at *2-44 (N.D. Ga. May 17, 2023), report and recommendation adopted, 2023 WL 3867792 (N.D. Ga. June 7, 2023) (Bruen does not require finding that machine gun possession is protected); United States v. Dixon, 2023 WL 2664076, at *3 (N.D. Ill. Mar. 28, 2023) (“Thus, Miller, Heller, and Bruen foreclose any challenge to the federal machinegun ban. The Second Amendment simply does not extend to ‘dangerous and unusual weapons.’”); United States v. Simien, ––– F. Supp. 3d ––––, 2023 WL 1980487, at *8–9 (W.D. Tex. Feb. 10, 2023) (finding that machineguns are within the category of “dangerous and unusual” weapons that do not receive Second Amendment protection); United States v. Hoover, 2022 WL 10524008, at *13 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 18, 2022) (finding nothing in Bruen that “would undermine” the line of authority holding that the Second Amendment does not protect machineguns); see also United States v. Holton (holding that section 5861(d) does not regulate protected conduct under the Second Amendment).

Wisconsin Divorce and Family Lawyers: www.DivergentFamilyLaw.com
Wisconsin OWI DUI Drunk Driving Lawyers www.Grievelaw.com
Wisconsin Criminal Attorneys www.Grievelaw.com

Wisconsin Ketamine Infusion Therapy for Depression and Anxiety, Reset Restore MD.
www.RandRMD.com

(PROOF) The RACIST History Of Gun Control Colonies + Early States [Part 1]
https://youtu.be/neLdsW7XZSM

Defensive Gun Use ends in CRIMINAL charges: Learn the Lessons [INTERVIEW]!
https://youtu.be/JqKycpoaUNM

(Interview) MASSIVE: Sheriff tells ATF NO will STOP ATF agents!
https://youtu.be/aT-DH4Zx54k

When do PARTS become GUNS and YOU go to PRISON: Law of Constructive Possession+Intent
https://youtu.be/FMLfR62nJHM

Contents of this video:

0:00 - Intro
0:25 - The history
4:32 - Legal outlook
5:25 - Legal goalposts
12:14 - What is a dangerous and unusual weapon?
13:01 - Miller case
19:37 - Final thoughts
21:37 - Quote of the Day

Attorney Tom Grieve is a former state criminal prosecutor from Wisconsin before eventually founding what is now the state's largest criminal defense firm at more than 20 attorneys. In 2019 the firm expanded into family law and added a dedicated team of professionals to further serve clients with similar aggressive and proven strategies.

Beyond the courtroom, Tom has been interviewed and appeared in numerous media outlets, ranging from the New York Times, CourtTV, Fox News, Reuters, Washington Post, National Public Radio, Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel, among many others. He is a frequent Continuing Legal Education course speaker to teach lawyers and judges in developments and the law, both in Wisconsin and nationally. Finally, Tom has also presented across the country, both online and in person, concerning the law and culture to the public.

To learn more, check out his law firm's website a www.GrieveLaw.com

Legal Disclaimer: nothing in this video is offered as legal advice or a formation of attorney-client relationship. If you want to hire my firm to be a client, you need to do just that and hire us... not watch us on the internet. If that offends your delicate sensibilities, just stop and be an adult. If you are outside of Wisconsin and want an attorney, contact one near where you are and stop trying to blame the internet and other people for your problems. This video is for educational purposes only and any clips or images shown are under fair use.