OP2405-5-6 After Action Report

OP2405-5-6 After Action report (Written by Google Gemini)

After Action Report (AAR)
OPORD Number: OP2405-5-6

Unit: Task Force - 1st Battalion, Chernarus 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade

Location: Guglovo, Chernarus

Mission: Intercept and defeat a large separatist force attempting to capture Guglovo.

Executive Summary:

Task Force successfully defended Guglovo against coordinated separatist attack by Spanish militia, Wagner Group mercenaries, and Russian militia. Enemy forces attempted to overrun the village from both northwest and northeast, with a focus on severing the main north-south road. After a period of intense fighting, the Task Force repelled the attack and inflicted significant casualties on the enemy. Moderate casualties were sustained by the Task Force during the defense. Intelligence suggests the separatists have increased the experience level of their commanders in the South Zagoria region.

Friendly Forces:

Task Force elements from 1st Battalion, Chernarus 4th Separate Light Mountain Rifle Brigade
2nd Squad
4th Squad
Command Squad (assumed)
Reserve Rifle Squad 3 (held in reserve)
2 Reinforcing Light Rifle Squads (source not specified)
Scout 1 BRDM scout car
MI-24 Hind attack helicopter (supporting role)
Enemy Forces:

Spanish militia
Wagner Group mercenaries
Russian militia
10+ Technicals
1 BMP infantry fighting vehicle (destroyed)
Narrative:

Preparation and Movement: The Task Force deployed to Guglovo in response to intelligence of a large separatist attack. A ten-minute defensive artillery barrage from the enemy impacted south of the village, causing no casualties or effect on friendly positions.
Deployment: Following a reconnaissance by Scout 1, the Task Force established a defensive position in a concave formation facing north. 2nd Squad, Command Squad (assumed), and 4th Squad formed the frontline, with 3rd Squad held in reserve to the southwest.
Initial Engagement: The initial attack came from the northwest by Spanish militia and Wagner Group forces. Rifle fire and heavy machine gun support from Scout 1 halted the enemy advance.
Main Attack and Defense: A coordinated separatist assault with vehicles launched from the east. The enemy attempted to sever the main north-south road, potentially trapping the Task Force. Intervention by an MI-24 gunship provided critical support in slowing the enemy advance.
Counterattack and Withdrawal: Simultaneously, Russian militia and Wagner Group forces attacked from the northeast. Reserve Rifle Squad 3 was redeployed to support 2nd Squad. Once the enemy momentum waned, a counterattack was launched to clear remaining hostiles. Following the counterattack, Battalion operations staff directed the Task Force to withdraw in good order.
Friendly Casualties:

2nd Squad: 1 KIA
4th Squad: 4 KIA
Reinforcing Rifle Squad 1: 2 KIA
Reinforcing Rifle Squad 2: 3 KIA
Enemy Casualties:

Field estimates indicate 10+ technicals and 1 BMP destroyed. Actual enemy casualty figures remain unknown.
Analysis:

The Task Force successfully defended Guglovo against a well-coordinated and determined enemy attack.
The enemy's use of vehicles and combined arms tactics posed a significant threat.
The timely intervention of the MI-24 gunship was critical in repelling the attack on the eastern flank.
Moderate casualties were sustained by the Task Force, highlighting the intensity of the engagement.
Intelligence reports suggesting an increase in experienced separatist leadership in South Zagoria were confirmed by the enemy's tactics and coordination.
Recommendations:

Reinforce the importance of maintaining situational awareness and rapid response to enemy actions.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the current defensive formations and consider adjustments for future engagements with combined arms threats.
Increase coordination with supporting air assets to ensure timely and effective intervention during critical moments of battle.
Continue intelligence gathering efforts to track enemy movements and leadership changes in South Zagoria.

This is based on the Arma 3 wargame. The voice is AI generated and represents no individual, living or dead. The text of the transcript, while AI generated, is based on data provided by the channel author.