Andy McCarthy on Trump Trial: ‘This Case Could Just as Equally Have Been Brought Against Hillary Clinton’

7 months ago
59

RUSH TRANSCRIPT:
ASMAN: “That’s horrible because, I mean, the jury’s not expected to know law, and they don’t know what’s legal and what isn’t. It’s the job of the jurors, it’s the job of the judge in the case to tell them what is legal and what is not, and if they don’t know it, they’re getting propaganda and not law. I do, you mentioned the opening statement of the prosecutor prosecution. And, by the way, this is the guy who came over from the DoJ – from the president’s DoJ. So he took a lesser job in order to pursue this. Makes people wonder whether the White House is involved. But here was something else he said if his opening statement, it was election fraud pure and simple. We will never now, and – know, and it doesn’t matter if this conspiracy was the difference maker in a close election. He was talking about suppressing the story in the national inquirer. Now, the same exact thing could be said for watt Biden folks were doing in 2020 before that election in trying to kill the Hunter Biden story, couldn’t it?”

McCarthy: “In fact, David, at the same time, simultaneously, the same thing could be said for Hillary Clinton’s campaign. They were putting out a bogus story that Trump was an operative of the Kremlin. Operate I have of the Kremlin. – operative. And they did that under bogus campaign research that they said they did, opposition research. And then in the books of the campaign, they did what Bragg is alleging Trump falsely did, which is they characterized a payment that was for one thing as legal expenses. So this case could just as equally have been brought against Hillary Clinton. And in many ways, you could argue that it was a stronger case against Hillary Clinton because her campaign was actually fined by the Federal Election Commission for a fraudulent practice. Both the Justice Department and the FEC looked at Trump on the same thing Bragg is prosecuting here and decided it wasn’t a campaign finance violation”

Loading comments...