Marc Morano Demolishes the Great Reset Agenda at the Heartland Institute's 2023 Climate Conference

12 days ago
5.04K

The UN, WEF, WHO, IMF, et.al call it Agenda 21,
Agenda 2030, New World Order,
The Great Reset or The Fourth Industrial Revolution.
The names keep changing to obfuscate, conceal and confuse.
The end game is:
■a smaller, more manageable population
■blockchained and geofenced HUMAN CAPITAL
■poverty 'management' for profit via Social Impact Investing
■a virtual and augmented reality lifestyle from cradle to grave via Digital Twinning
■a social credit rating system beginning at birth
■assetless COMMUNITARIANISM. The philosophy behind
ENVIRONMENTAL & SOCIAL GOVERNANCE that the U.N. DEMANDS OF SIGNATORY STATES (197 of them).
All property owned and managed by public-private technocratic partnerships, and ABSOLUTE EQUITY abolishing all individual rights in the name (excuse) of 'COMMUNITY.'
I could go on but I'll make it simple: you'll be connected to the Internet of Things, supervised and biometrically monitored 24/7 by algorithms.
Not even your thoughts will be private.
YOU WOULD NEVER CONSENT TO THIS LIFE IF IT WERE OFFERED TO YOU. THUS,
10 YEARS OF LOCKDOWN & FEAR WILL BREAK YOU AND HAVE YOU CONSENTING TO IT ALL (SO YOU CAN 'GO BACK TO NORMAL').
HOWEVER, JUST LIKE 3 WEEKS TO FLATTEN THE CURVE DIDN'T WORK, THE MASKS DIDN'T WORK,
THE DISTANCING DIDN'T WORK, THE ISOLATION DIDN'T WORK, THE BUSINESS CLOSURES DIDN'T WORK,
THE OBCCINES DON'T WORK, THIS WON'T RESULT IN NORMALCY EITHER.
A DECADE OF TORTURE ON THE HORIZON WILL EAT AWAY AT THE LIFE WE LEFT BEHIND.
BY THEN YOU'LL HAVE FORFEITED ALL YOUR HUMAN RIGHTS & ASSETS, ACCEPTED THE MICROCHIPS,
THE IMPLANTS, THE GENETIC ENGINEERING OF YOUR DNA,
YOUR CHILDREN WILL BE REARED BY THE STATE AND THERE WILL BE NO SUCH THING AS PHYSICAL CURRENCY OR PHYSICAL CONTACT WITH OTHERS.
I EXPECT OUR OLD LIFE WON'T EVEN BE A MEMORY BY THEN; IT WILL BE 'TOO DANGEROUS'
FOR PEOPLE TO REMEMBER HOW THINGS ONCE WERE. HISTORY AND MINDS WILL BE ERASED LIKE OUR POSTS ON SOCIAL MEDIA.
THIS IS NOT A THEORY. IT'S THE AGENDA AS DESCRIBED IN THEIR VERY OWN PUBLICATIONS.

THE ULTIMATE PROOF IS THAT IT'S CURRENTLY BEING EXECUTED BY THE PREDATORS WHO GO BY INNOCUOUS ABBREVIATIONS & THE TRAITORS IN OUR PARLIAMENTS.

The Great Reset Global Elites and the Permanent Lockdown Marc Morano

https://www.perlego.com/book/2881132/the-great-reset-global-elites-and-the-permanent-lockdown-pdf

Submitted Written Testimony of Marc Morano, the Publisher of CFACT’s Climate Depot

https://www.legis.state.pa.us/WU01/LI/TR/Transcripts/2022_0123_0003_TSTMNY.pdf

Summary of The Great Reset

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VqaNGgo8ELs

The Great Reset hinges upon a specific set of beliefs. Explicit or implicit ideological and actionable adherence to the following:

▪ραndemίcs and prevention of 'cοnταgίοn'

▪ναccίnes and ρreνenτατίνe treαtment

▪cΙίmατe chαnge and cαrβοn redυcτίοn

▪the left-right polarising divide

▪abolition of the separate private and public spheres and replacement by Public Private Partnerships (P3s)

▪dissolution of nation states

▪digital transformation and A.I control of the traditional three estates (separate powers of government)

▪revamped constitutions and 'reimagined' faith systems that advance collectivism and homogeny

Acceptance of these 'problems' and their predetermined 'solutions' are the GLARING SET-UP for us to walk straight into the digital gυΙαg and sit down to a meal of crispy cockroaches with a side serving of greens cultivated without sunlight.

These shady traps are so well concealed by confusion and distraction that starting at the end and working backwards is about the only way to see past the smoke and mirrors. Consider the following an exercise in reverse engineering.

AGENDA 2030 THE BIG TRAP, REMOVING GOVERNMENT, REWRITING CONSTITUTIONS~

The conclusion envisaged by the World Economic Forum, the United Nations and their affiliates is global goverNANCE withOUT a visible governMENT. We, are deviously being promised an equitable, inclusive, diverse, sustainable, and level playing field. What is actually happening is the forced transition into the Fourth Industrial Revolution, better understood as, comprehensive automation of physical labour, synthetic or artificial substitution of anything that can be imagined, more political and economic globalisation (ie., interdependence),
fewer physical interactions, less human input, less emphasis on real experience, evermore immersion into virtual reality, no private property, and no free will.

LOGISTICS~

Since humans are characterised as inherently biased, greedy, over-consuming, and fallible, artificial intelligence, a fancy name for algorithmic code (n.b, written by humans), is to determine the distribution of energy, food, shelter, clothing, travel miles, medical care, law enforcement, justice, information, jobs, and education.

Material goods, apportioned in the same vein, will be for temporary-use-only. Recycling, reusing, and upcycling will establish a Circular Economy respectful to nature.

To this end, it is anticipated that planned obsolescence will be removed from the core tenets of modern manufacturing practice.

Redefined as privileges, these entitlements will be dispensed on the grounds of 'predictive modelling' based on 'precision metrics.'

What this means in English is that algorithms which determine human pathways will be coded to predict outcomes, and so real world instructions will be based on computational forecasts.

THINGS THAT NEVER HAPPENED WILL BE THE DECIDING FACTORS of the opportunities and barriers in our lives.

This is the reason for omniscient and omnipresent surveillance above and "below the skin," according to Y.N. Harari,
who rationalizes that the more intelligence gathered, the more accurate the predictions will be.

Furthermore, the better-safe-than-sorry 'Precautionary Principle' will be strictly adhered to in the name of security.

Zero tolerance to risk will be built-in to the programme.

If an individual is gauged to have a predilection or predisposition of sorts that isn't favorable to predetermined outcomes,
that individual will be 'shielded' from temptation or participation.

For example, I have the propensity to forsake the emotional comfort of others,
by speaking my mind to those who avoid, with fervor, opinions contrary to the official narrative.

Thus, geofencing will very likely be employed to keep me from attending a 'community town hall' exercising the new version of political 'representation': Deliberative Democracy or a Citizens' Jury.

That is the abridged version of the logistical matters, which are aimed at our 'logical brain,' the left cerebral hemisphere.

To persuade the right hemisphere (the seat our humanity presides)

a WORLD ALLIANCE is being proposed: We are to ALIGN ourselves with others and the earth.

In this endeavor, our mind's eye is being asked to imagine the countryside becoming a pristine environment via the relocation of people, industry and farming.

On the other hand, cities are being transformed into bundles of discrete, self contained neighbourhoods--tightly regulated to prevent crime and disease.

These 'safe spaces' are promised to nurture a cohesive melding and blending of cultures, ethnicities, genders and religions.

These 20 MINUTE communities will (ostensibly) engender solidarity: ONENESS with each other and nature.

To ensure each resident performs their responsibilities to the cοΙΙective, and receives their equitable allotment (a spin off of cοmmυnίsm), A.I will be deployed as arbiter.

PRIVACY FRAMEWORK IS A RED HERRING, BAIT & SWITCH OPERATION~

Lax laws about privacy and its breaches (see Cyβer ΡοΙygοn) will be crafted and then magnified in the media.

"Scathing critique" from major news publications calling for statutory regulation of the Metaverse will garner popular support, resulting in a (gΙοβαΙ) constitution for the (gΙοβαΙ) virtual space.

Moreover, a license to gain entry into the online realm will be set in (gΙοβαΙ) law.

To put into context and real world terms, 'digital twinning'--one's cyber identity--will come before their real, flesh and blood person.

If the electronic twin isn't given a green light by A.I, the person will be locked out in physicality
(already demonstrated with ναccίne certificates).

Notably, gΙοβαΙ citizens will NOT have access to the Ιnternet without their bίοmetrίc ΙD being tracked and logged.

ALL activity ON- and OFF-line is building a data repository on a personal blockchain,
and will travel with the person as metadata accessible to the Internet of Things and Smart Cities.

Random people's phones, wearables, devices and appliances, smart street lights and poles, new vehicles, etc.,
all have sensors, receivers and transmitters that communicate with our unique data bundle, in real time.

The purpose of it is to coordinate, manage and profit off real people in real life in settled areas, as well as in nature (i.e., smart beaches and smart forests).

However, commodification isn't limited to Human Capital. Nature is another dynamic, eternal spring of data.

'Natural processes,' like rain, sunshine, wind, the flow of a river, tidal ebbing, animal migration, gaseous exchange--to name only a few--can be measured, and thus managed, and therefore traded on the stock market.

There will not be a square inch of earth or life not 'included' in Inclusive Capitalism.

Not people, not ecosystems, not soil, not flora or fauna will evade the cybernetic replica of earth, nor its intervention and monetisation in the burgeoning Data Economy.

HOW ~

The platform of e-heαΙτh is the mechanism by which everyone will be ensnared into the system from "womb to tomb." Co-opted by the medical mαfία, are the entry and exit points of life.

Consider it as you would a traveler navigating port entry and passport control in a foreign country.

Now see that 'face control'--biometric facial recognition technology--will be your 'key' to life, every breath between your first and last will be accounted for with bio-nanotech.
When the full potential of biometric surveillance is successfully realized and scaled to include the microcosm of cellular function, thought control will not be perceptible to the object.

An outrageous proposal by transhumanists employed by the WEF, but the definition of literal cyborgs (governed beings) nonetheless.

Back to the immediate future, ALL public and private services, goods, utilities, products, transactions, and exchanges are being overlayed with cyber locks that only digital identification can CONDITIONALLY open.

The computational lock is BY DEFAULT SET TO 'DENY.' The privilege (not right) to access life's most mundane of interactions is granted upon receipt of an acceptable digital aggregate, or 'footprint,' or SοcίαΙ Credίτ Rατίng.
Post script

This is the future that has been in the works for many decades.
It is not a theory,
it is a reader's digest of the agenda, with many key terms and phrases that are easily searched and verified by authoritative sources, such as governmental websites.
I'm loathe to add the ideological isms that inform Agεndα 2030,
because they often distract people who have fixated on a particular flavour of sΙανεry or τyranny.

Thus, I'm purposefully leaving it out in the hope this summary should travel further. (My optimism is showing, I know.)

What Is the Global Public-Private Partnership

TOPICS: Global Public Private Partnership Government, Propaganda, Stakeholder Capitalism, The Great Reset

The Global Public-Private Partnership (G3P) is a worldwide network of stakeholder capitalists and their partners.

This collective of stakeholders (the capitalists and their partners) comprises global corporations (including central banks), philanthropic foundations (multi-billionaire philanthropists), policy think tanks, governments (and their agencies), non-governmental organizations, selected academic and scientific institutions, global charities, labor unions and other chosen “thought leaders.”

https://www.weforum.org/.../klaus-schwab-on-what-is.../

The G3P controls global finance and the world’s economy.

It sets world, national and local policy (via global governance) and then promotes those policies using the mainstream media (MSM) corporations, which are also “partners” within the G3P.

Often those policies are devised by the think tanks before being adopted by governments, which are also G3P partners.

Government is the process of transforming G3P global governance into hard policy, legislation and law.

Under our current model of Westphalian national sovereignty, the government of one nation cannot make legislation or law in another.

However, through global governance, the G3P creates policy initiatives at the global level, which then cascade down to people in every nation.

This typically occurs via an intermediary policy distributor, such as the IMF or IPCC, and national government then enact the recommended policies.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westphalian_system

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_Governance

The policy trajectory is set internationally by the authorised definition of problems and their prescribed solutions. Once the G3P enforces the consensus internationally, the policy framework is set.

The G3P stakeholder partners then collaborate to ensure the desired policies are developed, implemented and enforced. This is the oft-quoted “international rules-based system.”

In this way, the G3P controls many nations at once without having to resort to legislation.

This has the added advantage of making any legal challenge to the decisions made by the most senior partners in the G3P (it is an authoritarian hierarchy) extremely difficult.

The G3P has traditionally been referenced in the context of public health— specifically in United Nations documents, including documents from UN agencies such as the World Health Organisation (WHO). The WHO’s 2005 document Connecting For Health, in noting what the Millennium Development Goals meant for global health, revealed the emerging G3P:

(Read in PDF)

https://web.archive.org/web/20210403084237

Connecting for Health Global Vision, Local Insight Report for the World Summit on the Information Society

https:/apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43385/9241593903_eng.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

The two researchers identified a key Davos address, delivered by the UN’s then-Secretary-General Kofi Annan to the WEF in 1998, as marking the transition to a G3P-based global governance model:

https://press.un.org/en/1998/19980130.sgsm6448.html

“Though the objective of shaping a community of the developed nations is less ambitious than the goal of world government, it is more attainable.”

https://ia800208.us.archive.org/.../between_twoages.pdf

By 2010 the WEF had begun what it called a “Global Redesign” process, in which it defined the international challenges and proposed solutions. Fortunately for the G3P, these proposals meant more control and partnership opportunities.
The WEF sought to spearhead the expansion of this international governance.

https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GRI_EverybodysBusiness_Report_2010.pdf

In 2019 the UK Government announced its partnership with the WEF to develop future business, economic and industrial regulations.

The UK government was committed to supporting a regulatory environment created by the global corporations, who would then be regulated by the same regulations they had themselves designed.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-and-world-economic-forum-to-lead-regulation-revolution-to-foster-industries-of-the-future

“To improve the state of the world, the World Economic Forum is starting The Great Reset initiative. [ . . . ] The Covid-19 crisis [ . . . ] is fundamentally changing the traditional context for decision-making. The inconsistencies, inadequacies and contradictions of multiple systems – from health and financial to energy and education – are more exposed than ever. [ . . . ] Leaders find themselves at a historic crossroads. [ . . . ] As we enter a unique window of opportunity to shape the recovery, this initiative will offer insights to help inform all those determining the future state of global relations, the direction of national economies, the priorities of societies, the nature of business models and the management of a global commons.”

https://www.weforum.org/great-reset

In 1972 the privately funded independent policy think tank Club of Rome (CoR) published The Limits to Growth. As we saw with the roll-out out of the pseudopandemic,
the CoR used computer models to predict what it decreed were the complex problems faced by the entire planet: the “world problematique.”

https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-limits-to-growth/

In 1983 the Brundtland Commission was convened by former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harland Brundlandt and then-Secretary-General of the UN Javier Pérez de Cuéllar.
Brundtland was a member of the Club of Madrid think tank and Pérez de Cuéllar a Club of Rome member.

Based upon the highly questionable assumptions in the World3 model, they set about uniting governments from around the world to pursue sustainable development policies.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brundtland_Commission

https://clubmadrid.org/

In 1987 the Commission published the Brundtland Report, also known as Our Common Future.
Central to the idea of sustainable development, as outlined in the report, was population control (reduction). This policy decision to get rid of people won international acclaim and awards for the authors.

https://en.m.wikisource.org/wiki/Brundtland_Report

The underlying assumptions for these policy proposals weren’t publicly challenged at all.

Though an academic and scientific debate raged, it remained almost completely unreported.

As far as the public knew, what were no more than unscientific assumptions and speculations were proven facts.
It is now impossible for any of us to question these unproven assumptions and obviously inaccurate models without being accused of “climate denial.”
From the Brundtland Report emerged the Millennium Development Goals, which in 2015 gave way to the United Nation’s full adoption of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Since then, these SDGs have been translated into government policy in country after country.

For example, in 2019 the UK government proudly announced its Net Zero policy commitment to sustainable development goals.

Adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

https://unevoc.unesco.org/home/Adoption+of+the+Sustainable+Development+Goals

The Limits to Growth

https://www.clubofrome.org/publication/the-limits-to-growth/

SDGs had already been making an impact at the regional and local levels in counties, cities, towns and boroughs across the UK. Now nearly every council across the country has a “sustainable development plan.”

https://www.portsmouth.gov.uk/.../creating-sustainable.../

Australia has legislated that its carbon emissions will be reduced by 65% by 2030.
Renewable energy programmes CANNOT compensate for fossil fuels, and thus, rather than replacing our energy sources, consumption of power and goods will shrink to 35% of 2007 levels.
To achieve this, the unelected bureaucrats and frontmen of the United Nations, World Economic Forum, and all their partners, are RESETTING the economy. In order to Build it Back Better they must first demolish the current system.
C0nνίd coincidentally afforded them the "opportunity" to roll out programmes that the Davos mob, Club of Rome, Chatham House, Council of Foreign Relations, Rockefeller Foundation, Tavistock, IMF, World Bank, BIS, BlackRock, Vanguard, UN & WEF (and a few others I don't recall) have been working on for decades.
It's curious, to say the least, that the wealthiest individuals, organisations and corporations in the world would effectively gamble all their wealth on a RESET - with very specific timelines - without knowing when the global collapse of fiat currency would happen, so they could implement it.
It reminds me of someone who might build a new house in preparation for their current one going up in flames.
For context, this person might be the CEO of the insurance company with which the old building is insured; his brother is chief of the fire department;
his best friend is the building contractor, his sister the investigator; and, his wife works in city planning overseeing permits...
So how will this new economy function? What does 65% reduction mean for us?
We will no longer budget our money, the new financial economy will be based on energy. Our ACCESS to goods and services will be determined by our social credit rating and how many carbon tokens we have.
In this CIRCULAR ECONOMY, in which "we will own nothing," our tools, appliances, dwelling, and cars will be on loan. Instead of owning a book, a bed, clothes, or furniture, we'll subscribe to companies that rent them out, kind of like Netflix, Uber, Airbnb, and Spotify.
Regarding consumables that can't be reused, the Track Your Impact™️ label on the body wash (pictured) will tell shoppers how many carbon points will be deducted from their annual allowance.
Are we starting to understand why small to medium shopkeepers and businesses that trade goods are whittling away? Why travel has become so traumatic and cumbersome that people would rather save themselves the hassle?
Shipping, recreational travel, beef and lamb are destined for the history books according to the Absolute Zero scheme which is the forecast for 2050. Absolute (net) zero refers to that 65% decline of carbon emissions reaching 100%. What they mean is that human output of carbon will be offset with carbon sequestration.
Unfortunately, for the average person, the trees growing naturally on the planet won't count for us - mitigating our carbon expenses. No, the trees and forests will be owned and operated by Natural Asset Companies (NACs) which will trade carbon tokens as a commodity. We will essentially be paying for the air we breathe like we already pay for that other renewable, water.
So how will we earn carbon credits to sustain our existence?
Enter the Metaverse. Our digital twin will work digitally for digital currency, digital 'goods & services,' digital recreation, and digital relationships. By staying home and not consuming real, tangible things, we'll minimise our carbon footprint.
If the doom and gloom of climate modelling wasn't a deception, then perhaps some people would be forgiven for wanting to give up childbearing. If replicating life electronically for the population of the earth didn't cost A LOT of infrastructure and power, living a cyber life instead of a real life mightn't sound so disdainful.
This is why the c0νίd situation is becoming increasingly absurd: there's a huge chasm between The Great Narrative (WEF) and reality. The story doesn't match the picture as perceived by our senses because the tale is about a ραndεmίc whilst the agenda is about an overhaul of how we live.
By complying with mandates, policies and measures we get closer to this "real virtuality," by the day. We tacitly agree this is the future we want.
Without the GREAT DECEPTION we would never have accepted our real lives being RESET to digital slavery. Away from people and nature. Please see through the ruse. Please question the contradictions. Please investigate the legislation of your governments and think tanks and supranational organisations. They're not hiding it, they're just distracting you with fear.
Besides the words and phrases highlighted above, documents and policies to chase up:
■NET ZERO
■ABSOLUTE ZERO (document)
■POLICY HORIZONS CANADA
■ACCESS ECONOMY
■DIGITAL CONVERGENCE
■Inclusive Capitalism OR Stakeholder Capitalism OR Surveillance Capitalism
■ CBDC Central Bank Digital Currency
■NACs (Natural Asset Companies)
■MASTERCARD DOCONOMY
■EFTPOS QR
■ Social Impact Investing
■ Environmental & Social Governance
■Paris Agreement 2015
■ Smart Cities
■Digital Twinning
■Smart Toy Awards (WEF)
■ Human 2.0
■ Virtual clothes
■ NFTs
■ Neural prosthetics (MIT)
■ Prof. Yuval Harari

United Nations Proposes Digital ID System Tied to Bank Accounts and Mobile Payment Platforms

https://dailyhodl.com/2023/06/24/united-nations-proposes-digital-id-system-tied-to-bank-accounts-and-mobile-payment-platforms/

Metaverse identity encompasses three components:

Representation: including personal, social and role identity,
be it through avatars, pseudonyms or other digital expressions

Data: capturing the intricate web of knowledge about individuals generated
by metaverse supporting hardware and software
Identification (ID):
be it through driver’s licenses, government-issued IDs, passports, birth certificates, attestations, labels, or usernames and passwords

Congress explores digital identity schemes, WEF-backed public-private collaboration agenda

https://sociable.co/government-and-policy/congress-digital-identity-wef-public-private-agenda/

The US House of Representatives explores digital identity schemes and hears testimony in favor of public-private collaboration on biometric ID authentication standards championed by the World Economic Forum and the FIDO Alliance.

The World Economic Forum (WEF) is pushing digital identity as a major component of its globalist great reset agenda to revamp the world’s economy and all societal structures.

“The public and private sectors should collaborate to deliver solutions that promote confidence, privacy, choice, and innovation” — “Improving Digital Identity Act of 2021”

In January, 2020, the WEF partnered with the FIDO Alliance on a 26-page report called “Passwordless Authentication,” in which the two entities presented how digital identity could be authenticated using FIDO’s biometric principles.

FIDO, which stands for Fast IDentity Online, developed an authentication standard that looks to eliminate the need for passwords and replace them with a user’s biometric identifiers through voice and facial recognition, iris scans, and fingerprint swipes.

Testifying on digital identity before Congress on Friday was one of the joint WEF-FIDO report contributors, Jeremy Grant, who is also the managing director at Venable — a WEF partner on the Platform for Good Digital Identity.

WEF_Passwordless_Authentication.pdf

https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Passwordless_Authentication.pdf

KEY INSIGHTS FROM THE REPORT

The Evolution and Importance of Digital ID:

The report traces the history of identification and its pivotal role in society, emphasizing the need for digital ID in an era where digital transactions and AI are becoming ubiquitous. It discusses various forms of digital ID, including centralized, federated, and decentralized systems, each with unique advantages and challenges.

Decentralized ID – A Paradigm Shift: Decentralized ID systems, leveraging cryptography and digital wallets, empower individuals to manage their data while allowing multiple entities to issue credentials.
This approach enhances privacy, control, and efficiency, and is seen as a potential game-changer in the digital ID landscape.

Challenges and Recommendations:

Despite its potential, decentralized ID faces implementation barriers, including technical complexities, policy gaps, and governance challenges.

The report provides comprehensive recommendations for stakeholders, emphasizing the need for technological innovation, policy development, and collaboration to realize the full potential of decentralized ID.

While the report primarily focuses on the broader research project of decentralized ID,
it acknowledges the contributions of various stakeholders, including organizations like the Learning Economy Foundation.

The Foundation's role in supporting these efforts, particularly in the context of educational and skill credentials, is crucial.

Decentralized ID can enable verifiable, efficient, and private proof of educational achievements, aligning with the Foundation's mission of fostering a learning economy.

"Reimagining Digital ID" by the World Economic Forum is a significant contribution to the ongoing discourse on digital identity. It not only highlights the challenges faced by millions without legal IDs but also proposes decentralized ID as a viable solution to enhance privacy, control, and access to services.

The report's recommendations offer a roadmap for stakeholders, including the Learning Economy Foundation, to navigate the complexities of implementing decentralized ID systems effectively.

World Bank president calls on governments to launch digital ID, connect with private sector

https://sociable.co/government-and-policy/world-bank-governments-digital-id-connect-private-sector/

Reimagining Digital ID
INSIGHT REPORT
JUNE 2023 https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Reimagining_Digital_ID_2023.pdf

Netherlands Promotes Digital ID At Davos - Armstrong Economics

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/world-news/wef/netherlands-promotes-digital-id-at-davos/

Reimagining Digital ID: A World Economic Forum Insight Report

https://www.learningeconomy.io/post/reimagining-digital-id-a-world-economic-forum-insight-report

UN pushes for global digital ID system to boost financial inclusion

https://dig.watch/updates/un-pushes-for-global-digital-id-system-to-boost-financial-inclusion

Davos 2023: What To Know About WEF's Digital ID Initiative To Reduce Poverty, Increase Global Productivity

https://www.benzinga.com/news/23/01/30564786/davos-2023-why-to-know-about-wefs-digital-id-initiative-to-reduce-poverty-increase-global-productivi

Your metaverse identity will be central to daily life: WEF report

Virtual voodoo dolls, autonomous avatars & digital doppelgangers will be your behavior-profiling passports in the metaverse: perspective
Your metaverse identity, with its digital ID, biometric data capture, and behavior profiling, will be central to your every day life, according to a World Economic Forum (WEF) report.

“Metaverse identity” is a relatively new concept that the WEF and Accenture describe in great detail in a new 48-page report entitled “Metaverse Identity: Defining the Self in a Blended Reality.”

According to the report:

“As people spend more time exploring, playing and socializing in digital experiences, a person’s metaverse identity will be central to their day-to-day life as well as to the way they express their personal identity.”

But what exactly do the unelected globalists mean by “metaverse identity?”

https://sociable.co/government-and-policy/metaverse-identity-central-daily-life-wef/

great reset

https://sociable.co/tag/great-reset/

‘Internet of Bodies may lead to Internet of Brains’ by 2050: Rand

“An ‘internet of bodies’ may also ultimately lead to an ‘internet of brains’, i.e. human brains connected to the internet to facilitate direct brain-to-brain communication and enable access to online data networks”

Commissioned by the UK Defence Science and Technology Laboratory and conducted by RAND Europe and Frazer Nash Consulting, the study “Cultural and technological change in the future information environment” looks at six technologies and information environments and their implications for British defense.

They include:

Automated information systems
A virtual metaverse
Augmented and mixed reality
Advanced connectivity
Human augmentation
Information security
A major theme running through these information environments is transhumanism — the merger of humans and machines.

“While some experts predict the tactical improvement of human capabilities, others have explored the potential emergence of ‘trans-humanism’ within the 2050 timeframe”

RAND Corporation, March 2024

https://sociable.co/military-technology/internet-of-bodies-internet-of-brains-2050-rand/

Cultural and technological change in the future information environment

https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA2662-1.html

Your digital identity can be used against you in the event of a great reset

https://sociable.co/technology/your-digital-identity-used-against-you-great-reset/

Metaverse Identity:
Defining the Self in
a Blended Reality
INSIGHT REPORT
MARCH 2024

https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Metaverse_Identity_Defining_the_Self_in_a_Blended_Reality_2024.pdf

un. Member States

https://www.un.org/en/about-us/member-states

In May 2022, the World Economic Forum launched
the Defining and Building the Metaverse Initiative,
which orchestrates an integrated approach to the
development and governance of the metaverse.

https://initiatives.weforum.org/defining-and.../home

Our Common Agenda
Policy Brief 5
A Global Digital
Compact —
an Open, Free
and Secure
Digital Future
for All
MAY 2023

https://www.un.org/sites/un2.un.org/files/our-common-agenda-policy-brief-gobal-digi-compact-en.pdf

Obama signed EO 13575,
establishing the White House Rural Council.

The council is a list of the most aggressive agencies and departments in the US government.

The all inclusive council members represent the very agencies and departments most dedicated to forcing the subjugation of the US to United Nations control.
In fact, many of the agencies, departments and organizations listed as Council members are in fact creations of the UN;
created for no other purpose than to give the United Nations direct access to the United States.

This council can be viewed as nothing less than the establishment of a domestic terrorism group which will orchestrate the coming assault on private agricultural property owners in an effort to force them off their land and out of production.

There was an effort during the Reagan presidency to launch a similar assault on individual owners of agricultural land which would have displaced more than 2 million people,
handing their land over to others who were more amenable to the government and UN control.

https://web.archive.org/.../executive-order-13575-the.../

Executive Order 13575—Establishment of the White House Rural Council
June 9, 2011

https://www.govinfo.gov/.../DCPD.../pdf/DCPD-201100431.pdf

America 2050 - Detailed Plans
All SMART CITIES & 11 Planned Mega-Regions
The Wildlands Project - “Manhattanizing America”
All Of The Circles On The Map Represent Planned "Smart Cities" AKA Digital Prisons.
The Colored Area Represent Inter-locked Mega-Regions Designated For "Human" Habitats.
Everything Else You See On The Map Is To Be Given To Nature And Humans Removed.
"Leave Room For Nature" "Leave Room For Nature"
Full Resolution Map

https://i.postimg.cc/4yDPM7yb/megaregions.png

Almost all Americans know about the United Nations, but few know about Agenda 21, or the US government’s implementation of UN policies into our government and society.
The UN issued several policies at the 1992 Earth Summit, one of which was the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD).

Compliance with this UN policy is being driven and managed by the Wildlands Network which shares the same goals as the CBD; to set aside half the land in America for animals.

https://www.cbd.int/

United Nations Conference on Environment & Development
Rio de Janerio, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992
AGENDA 21

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf

Climate Action - United Nations Sustainable Development

https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/climate-action/

Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development

https://sdgs.un.org/publications/transforming-our-world-2030-agenda-sustainable-development-17981

Implementation of Agenda 21, the
Programme for the Further Implementation of Agenda 21 and the outcomes of the World Summit on Sustainable Development

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Implementation_of_Agenda21.pdf

Review of implementation of Agenda 21
Detailed review of implementation of Agenda 21

https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/1126SD21%20Agenda21_new.pdf

PRESIDENT CLINTON'S COUNCIL ON SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT (1993-1999)
Was Removed From The Internet Sometime After Feb 2017
This Agenda 21 plan was put into action by Clinton after the 1992 Rio summit.

https://web.archive.org/...//clinton2.nara.gov/PCSD/Charter/

America 2050 Website - Archived
America 2050 is a project of "Regional Plan Association"

https://web.archive.org/.../http://www.america2050.org/

http://www.america2050.org/

The Fourth Regional Plan
Making the Regions Work for All of Us

http://fourthplan.org/

Producing world-class research since 1922, RPA has more than 400 original reports and white papers in its digital library. Our reports have guided policymakers, communities, businesses, and civic organizations in the tri-state region for nearly 100 years.

https://rpa.org/
------------
WILDWAYS--THE WILDERNESS PROJECT: SEE THE MAPS...
Creating landscapes for life
Humans need highways, wildlife needs Wildways

https://web.archive.org/.../http://www.twp.org/wildways

FHWA Strategic Plan FY2022-2026

https://highways.dot.gov/sites/fhwa.dot.gov/files/2023-05/FHWA_Strategic_Plan_05.25.23.pdf

GIS Strategic Plan 2022-2024

https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2022-06/US-DOT-GIS-Strategic-Plan-2022-24.pdf

'Megaregions and America's Future.'

https://fotac.gsd.harvard.edu/listen/fritz-steiner/

Why We Need a
Trans-American Network
April 17, 2009 By Petra Todorovich, Director, America 2050

https://avalonlibrary.net/Agenda_21/Megaregion_maps_%28US%29/America2050_Intercity_Passenger_Recs.pdf

Trans-American Freight Network - 2050
Infographic

https://web.archive.org/.../www.../maps/AM2050cargo.png

Comprehensive Economic
Development Strategy (CEDS)
Content Guidelines:
Recommendations for Creating an Impactful CEDS

https://www.eda.gov/sites/default/files/2023-03/2023-CEDS-Content-Guidelines-Full-Report.pdf

High-Speed Rail Plans in America

https://web.archive.org/.../high-speed-rail-in-america.html

And
56 Page PDF Report

https://web.archive.org/.../pdf/HSR-in-America-Complete.pdf

For five years, we've created new maps based upon the needs of the project. This is a sampling of maps that show how we've represented some of the specific facets of the complex and large-scale issues facing American megaregions
.
https://www.behance.net/.../America-2050-Transportation-Maps

original link found on The Heartland Institute

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bW8wdKhmPvQ&t=72s

Loading 3 comments...