Let Us Spray TV3 NZ

8 months ago
75

Documentary exposé of Chemical Poisoning in New Zealand with a complicit Government with conflicts of interest.

# 1960's - 1987
The Poisoning of a NZ Community: from toxic emissions of the chemical plant owned by Ivan Watkins Dow, Paritutu, New Plymouth.

# IWD. DOW Chemical Company
Was heavily subsidised by the incumbent Governments of New Zealand. For years Successive NZ Governments have denied there is a generational effect from exposure to 245t 24d and the by-products of dioxins. 44 Million Litres of 245t/24d sprayed in Vietnam & 20 Million Litres sprayed in New Zealand, the next highest user.

# 1972:
The NZ Govt. was officially aware of the danger to human health in.
Yet the NZ Govt. allowed production to continue unimpeded until 1986 when a bursting disc failure saw huge amounts of raw dioxin spewed into the air at high pressure. Authorities and IWD Dow concealed the event for 2 days until a whistleblower raised the red flag

# 1974:
The Accident Compensation Corporation NZ (ACC NZ) began. 100% funded by the NZ Government paid by the Taxpayers; instead of the offending business paying out for the injuries. It prevented independant litigations against "Employers for workplace Injuries" Sugar Coated: A streamline process for workers to get quick settlements avoiding protracted legal proceedings.

# BOTTOM LINED:
COMPANIES > SHIELDED by Gov. LAWS.

VICTIM > DENIED Claims.
VICTIM > FORCED into Appeal Processes.
VICTIM > JOUST Gov-Funded ACC Topshelf Lawyers.
VICTIM > Legal Aid Lawyers "JOUST" [Gov-Lawyers] (NO CONTEST)
VICTIM > Appeals processes: ACC Review; Dis. Court; High Court

MEANWHILE:
Gov. Funded Lawyers > GET RICH
Victim > mentally and physically spent, poorer that a church mouse and (Two Thirds of Beggar All) "recompense, restitution". Nada, Zit, 0, Zero.

Loading comments...