No Age Ontology - Timeless Freedom
The Timeless Mind of Pure Being is ‘self-contained’ like a drop of mercury that doesn’t mix with the object it touches. On the other hand, the dualistic mind of self-grasping is like water which mixes and becomes completely entangled and intermingled when it touches an object like sand for example. Our innermost state of Timeless Being is timelessly free because it has never become mixed or entangled with any of its illusory appearances and therefore there is no need to free it anew but simply to recognize its basic and spontaneous Timeless Freedom. However, if one identifies with appearances and circumstances within conditioned existence then one is never really free because of the numberless limitations entailed by possessing a body-mind aggregate which needs constant caring, food, water, shelter, clothing and companionship.
For more detailed information about No Age Ontology and the the Laws of Reality you can refer to my books here:
No Age Ontology ►►►https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CX42GPKV
The Seven Laws of Reality and Being ►►►https://www.amazon.com/dp/0992730406
-
6:14
No Age Ontology
3 months agoNo Age Ontology - Free Will and Timeless Reality
30 -
3:59
No Age Ontology
2 months agoNo Age Ontology - Timelessness and the present moment
44 -
32:14
TheSanctuaryJupiter
2 months ago $0.01 earnedAgeless Freedom | "Life Without God, Part 08" | Tullian Tchividjian
7 -
1:17:26
The Protestant View
2 months agoTitle: The Singular Reality of the Present: A Case for Strict Presentism
1531 -
9:21
You Have Chosen To Remember
2 months agoWhat Time Is to Eternity
17 -
38:02
The Bible Rightly Divided
2 months agoRightly Dividing The Word Of Truth: Ages To Come
105 -
14:04
Cory - Nature Is The Answer
2 months agoSTOICISM & TAOISM | Use These TIMELESS Principles To NEVER Give Up!
841 -
2:17
The1MoeYouKnow
3 months agoThe Entangled Lives of Eom and The Great Quantum Awakening Across The Multiverse
18 -
6:50
The1MoeYouKnow
3 months agoThe Great Quantum Awakening
54 -
21:00
BroGC
2 months agoThe 7 age fallacy interpretation
200