"Parliament is not Sovereign" Neil Oliver - Sounds like Cromwell BUT WHY?

He got much right and some wrong with his monologue today. But here's the kicker. The most important part is this statement that is factually and legally correct. "Parliament is not Sovereign" - under the constitution not one part of the separation of powers can be absolute. The difference between administrative law (absolute and non Jury) and common law (precedents and Juries).

You cannot be a Judge in your own cause.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsoLU_xXuTg

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/04/university-texas-forced-lay-60-dei-employees-as/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=the-gateway-pundit&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=2024-04-04

Stealing your property Lease Act 1998

England for the English by Richard Body page 51 and 54

We are launching our campaign on Monday, targeting all human rights charities. In light of the fact that you have neither initiated nor attempted to bring a case against the British police in England and Wales under the provisions of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, sections 134/135, and considering it is the first time since 1640 that an English or Welshman cannot attain justice for torture in English courts upon denial of justice, we seek clarification. Additionally, it has come to our attention that your organisation has never pursued a case under universal jurisdiction in the USA, particularly in Texas, a state that fully adopted English common law in its 1836 constitution.

Could you also explain why there has been no attempt to petition a single judge of the King's Bench for the incorporation of the "Tort of Torture" into common law as a new tort?

These are genuine questions directed towards a charity that receives over £1,000,000 annually, with part of that funding being taxpayer-assisted.

twitter: @INQUEST_ORG