Who killed Kennedy? Roger Stone debates Gerald Posner

The JFK Assassination Revisited: Stone vs. Posner Debate

In a riveting session on Rumble, Roger Stone and Gerald Posner, two figures with deeply divergent views, come together to debate one of the most enduring mysteries in American history: the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. This debate not only revisits the well-trodden paths of conspiracy and controversy but also sheds new light on the differing perspectives that continue to fuel the discussion decades after the tragic event.

The Oswald Conundrum

At the heart of the debate is Lee Harvey Oswald's role in the assassination. Gerald Posner, known for his exhaustive investigative work, argues in favor of the Warren Commission's findings that Oswald acted alone. Posner's "Case Closed" meticulously supports this theory with evidence and analysis, aiming to put the speculation of conspiracy to rest.

Contrastingly, Roger Stone represents the faction that believes Oswald was not the lone gunman or was merely a patsy in a larger, more sinister plot. With his deep political background and penchant for uncovering hidden narratives, Stone brings alternative theories implicating various entities and individuals, suggesting a cover-up at the highest levels.

The CIA, the Mafia, and Beyond

The debate delves into the myriad of conspiracy theories that have emerged, implicating everyone from the CIA and the Mafia to Vice President Lyndon B. Johnson. Stone's arguments often reflect these theories, suggesting a complex web of interests that had the motive and means to orchestrate Kennedy's assassination.

The Impact on American Society

Beyond the specifics of who pulled the trigger, Posner and Stone explore the assassination's profound impact on American society, politics, and trust in government. The debate highlights how the event has fueled skepticism toward official narratives and spurred a relentless quest for truth among generations of Americans.

No End in Sight

The debate between Roger Stone and Gerald Posner on the JFK assassination underscores the complexity and enduring fascination with the case. While Posner's arguments appeal to those seeking closure through concrete evidence and analysis, Stone's perspective resonates with those skeptical of the official account and convinced of a broader conspiracy.

As the discussion concludes, it's evident that the debate over who killed Kennedy is far from over. The contrasting views of Stone and Posner reflect the broader societal divide on the issue, a testament to the assassination's lasting legacy as one of the most pivotal and debated moments in American history.