Hannah Reed's Motion for New Trial (Defense Attorney Explains)

Save
Streamed on:
1.13K

#Hannahreed #rustshooting #alecbaldwin #halynahutchins #rustmovie #potentiallycriminal

On March 7, 2024 a jury convicted Hannah Reed of one count of Involuntary Manslaughter and acquitted her of a single count of Tampering with Evidence. She faces up to 18 months in prison.

On March 14, 2024, the New Mexico Supreme Court issued a ruling in a case called State v. Taylor which appears to have challenged the use of "and/or" in jury instructions.

Hannah's attorney, Jason Bowles, filed a motion for a new trial based on defective jury instructions

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
MERCH
*TeeSpring - https://potentiallycriminal.creator-spring.com

DONATE
*Venmo: sean-martin-462
*Zelle: potentiallycriminal@gmail.com

CONTACT
* Email - potentiallycriminal@gmail.com
* Actual Mail - PO Box 716, Willoughby, OH 44096

LINKS
*Locals - https://potentiallycriminal.locals.com
*Rumble - https://rumble.com/PotentiallyCriminal
*Odysee - https://odysee.com/@PotentiallyCriminal
*Twitch - https://www.twitch.tv/potentially_criminal
*Kick - https://kick.com/potentially-criminal
*BitChute - https://bitchute.com/potentially_criminal/
*Discord - https://discord.gg/Aad4KdwVya
*Website - www.seanpmartinlaw.com

Nothing in the commentary or responses provided by Sean P. Martin, Esq., Martin Media LLC, or Martin Law Office LLC, expressly or implied, shall be deemed to be legal advice and shall not be construed as the creation of an attorney-client relationship in any way. The viewer has responsibility of obtaining legal advise from an competent and licensed attorney, and is urged to do so. Support of this channel or purchase of any affiliated products or services does not constitute the creation of an attorney-client relationship. Any opinions expressed herein are my own and do not reflect those of any organization, association or group.

All references or clips that may be used on this channel are for fair use commentary, criticism, and educational purposes. See Hughes v. Benjamin, 437 F. Supp. 3d 382 (S.D.N.Y. 2020); Hosseinzadeh v. Klein, 276 F.Supp.3d 34 (S.D.N.Y. 2017); Equals Three, LLC v. Jukin Media, Inc., 139 F. Supp. 3d 1094 (C.D. Cal. 2015).

Copyright Martin Media LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Want to create live streams like this? Check out StreamYard: https://streamyard.com/pal/d/5660283745075200

Loading comments...