WUCN Epi #173 - Part 1 - Protecting Canadian Freedoms and God Given Rights from Justin Trudeau and H

WUCN Epi #173 - Part 1 - Protecting Canadian Freedoms and God Given Rights from Justin Trudeau and His Globalist Controllers written by WUCN Researcher and Journalist Seine Lady.

Show Notes / References

Find Canadian federal statutes here:
https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/ and look for Constitution Act 1867 - 1982 or Canada Act or Charter of Rights and Freedoms. None of these are found.

Then for UK statutes go to https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ and search Canada Act and you will find the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms here.
What this means, is that the Bill of Rights still reigns - thank the Lord.

Canadian Bill of Rights CASE LAW Post Charter 1982 (Federal matters):

R. v. Andrew, 1986 CanLII 966 (BC SC)
The fact that I have held that the principle of equality before the law does not fail within s. 7 does not mean however that it is not a principle of fundamental
justice. It simply means that the principle is not yet entrenched by the Charter. The Charter did not repeal the Canadian Bill of Rights nor did it do away with
principles of fundamental justice existing independently of the Bill of Rights. In the Gustavson decision McKenzie J. said at pp. 6-7, p. 474 C.C.C., p. 495
D.L.R.:

The Queen v. Beauregard, 1986 CanLII 24 (SCC), [1986] 2 SCR 56
I have reached the conclusion that s. 29.1(2) of the Judges Act is inconsistent with s. 1(b) of the Canadian Bill of Rights and that the respondent is entitled to a declaration that this subsection is inoperative in so far as the respondent is concerned.

Singh v. Minister of Employment and Immigration, 1985
It has not been declared by any Act of the Parliament of Canada that the Immigration Act, 1976 shall operate notwithstanding the Canadian Bill of Rights. In
view of s. 5(2) of An Act for the Recognition and Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, 1960 (Can.), c. 44, in Part II which follows the
Canadian Bill of Rights, I do not see any reason not to apply the principle in the Drybones case to a provision enacted after the Canadian Bill of Rights

MacBain v. Lederman, 1985 CanLII 5548
Another successful outcome was in the 1985 Federal Court of Appeal case of MacBain v Lederman, where the Court considered whether parts of the federal
Human Rights Act violated the right to a fair hearing.[18] In that case, Mr. MacBain faced a discrimination complaint brought against him by one of his
employees.[19] However, the procedures outlined in the Act allowed the same people who prosecuted the complaint against Mr. MacBain to select the
decision makers in the hearing process.[20]

1992 CASE LAW that validates provincial law enforcement applies to the Bill of Rights:

R. v. Moser, 1992 CanLII 2839 (ON CA)
https://www.canlii.org/en/on/onca/doc/1992/1992canlii2839/1992canlii2839.html?autocompleteStr=%20v%20Moser&autocompletePos=1&resultId=c466239009734ea2a8b456ace71b4282&searchId=2024-03-09T15:59:44:745/b5945bc580734351891a209786c986bc

DISCLAIMER:
Wake Up Canada News does not provide legal advice. Nothing and no one in this video is to be construed as legal advice.
The video is for entertainment purposes only.