Explosions on September 11, 2001: Film with Graeme MacQueen (September 11, 2023)

The video discusses the events of September 11, 2001, and questions the official narrative, suggesting that controlled demolition may have been involved in the collapse of the World Trade Center towers. The speaker examines eyewitness testimonies and points out inconsistencies in the official explanation, raising doubts about the true nature of the attacks and the subsequent wars in the Middle East.

[00:12](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAKZTaS6ZkI&list=PLJ66jnKkCnrzAzNowE8C_6SPU3WaXm4lx&index=2&t=12.887) The speaker discusses his experience of presenting the events of 9/11 to young people and asserts that the official narrative is false, arguing that it was not Arab extremists who were responsible for the attacks.
- The speaker projected a Wikipedia page on the 9/11 attacks and highlighted one line, stating that while that line may be true, everything else is false.
- He believes that the 9/11 attacks were a fraud and not carried out by Arab extremists.
- The speaker questions why the richest country in the world would invade the poorest country in the world and justifies his mission to fight against war on Earth.
[11:30](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAKZTaS6ZkI&list=PLJ66jnKkCnrzAzNowE8C_6SPU3WaXm4lx&index=2&t=690.314) The speaker discusses different types of triggers for war and provides examples.
- Natural triggers occur when two armies clash over the same territory.
- Controlled triggers involve exploiting a random event to escalate a conflict intentionally.
- The speaker mentions the example of Pearl Harbor as a controlled trigger for war.
[22:59](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAKZTaS6ZkI&list=PLJ66jnKkCnrzAzNowE8C_6SPU3WaXm4lx&index=2&t=1379.628) This section of the video discusses the disbelief and confusion surrounding the events of September 11, 2001.
- The scene is described as resembling a Hollywood movie with people crying and holding hands while observing the wreckage of the World Trade Centers.
- The narrator recalls having conflicting memories and accepting the mainstream narrative despite a gut feeling that something was wrong.
- The speaker mentions attending a World Health Organization meeting in Geneva in 2003, where officials publicly claimed everything was fine, but privately expressed doubts.
[34:28](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAKZTaS6ZkI&list=PLJ66jnKkCnrzAzNowE8C_6SPU3WaXm4lx&index=2&t=2068.232) There were multiple explosions on September 11, 2001, contradicting the official narrative.
- 31 people used the term "bomb" to describe their experience.
- Witnesses reported large explosions and smoke filling the area.
- Eyewitness accounts provide important evidence contradicting the official explanation of the collapse of the steel-framed buildings.
[45:55](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAKZTaS6ZkI&list=PLJ66jnKkCnrzAzNowE8C_6SPU3WaXm4lx&index=2&t=2755.627) Various individuals, including the editor of an Arab newspaper and former government officials, expressed the belief that the 9/11 attacks were a deliberate act of war and called for a military response from the United States.
- The editor of an Arab newspaper received a warning from Osama bin Laden's employees but did not take it seriously.
- Former government officials, including the ex-Defense Minister, ex-Foreign Minister, and ex-Prime Minister of Israel, expressed support for a military response.
- Newt Gingrich, former Speaker of the House, referred to the 9/11 attacks as the "Pearl Harbor of the 21st century" and emphasized the need to treat it as an act of war.
[57:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAKZTaS6ZkI&list=PLJ66jnKkCnrzAzNowE8C_6SPU3WaXm4lx&index=2&t=3442.814) The speaker discusses the connection between the 9/11 hijackers and the anthrax attacks, suggesting a cover-up to hide the involvement of the hijackers in both incidents.
- Lewis Saletti, a neighbor of Bob Stevens, who died from anthrax, lived near the flight school where Mohamed Atta, one of the hijackers, trained.
- Gloria Irish, a real estate agent who worked for the first person to die from anthrax, also had connections to some of the 9/11 hijackers.
- The anthrax attacks were traced back to American military laboratories, making them ineffective for the intended purpose of implicating the hijackers.
- The speaker suggests that the cover-up was to prevent the revelation that the hijackers were involved in both the 9/11 attacks and the anthrax attacks.
[01:08:53](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAKZTaS6ZkI&list=PLJ66jnKkCnrzAzNowE8C_6SPU3WaXm4lx&index=2&t=4133.212) The section discusses the "Shock and Awe" operation during the Iraq War and raises suspicions about the justification for the war.
- American warships and aircraft initiated the Operation Iraqi Freedom with a series of attacks.
- The quick authorization of power and authority to the president is seen as suspicious, given the lack of knowledge about what happened and who was responsible.
- The narrative of the war against terror and evil Islamists, led by Osama bin Laden, has already been decided upon, despite the lack of reasonable evidence.
- The upcoming airstrikes tonight are expected to be less intense than the previous night's attack.
- The section questions the connection between Iraq and weapons of mass destruction, implying that the war is not justified.
[01:20:22](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fAKZTaS6ZkI&list=PLJ66jnKkCnrzAzNowE8C_6SPU3WaXm4lx&index=2&t=4822.192) The speaker researched the predictions made by about 60 firefighters in the New York Fire Department regarding the collapse of WTC 7 and found that they made the predictions two hours or more in advance, even though the building did not appear significantly damaged.
- The speaker wanted to know when the firefighters made the predictions and how certain they were about them.
- The speaker also wanted to understand if the predictions were based on visible damage to the building or other factors.
- The collapse of WTC 7 led to extensive speculation as it did not fit the typical textbook example and there were no airplanes that hit the building.