No Contact Epidemic: Is Therapy Helping or Hurting??

4 months ago
83

It appears that Gen Z and Gen Alpha are being influenced to become estranged from their parents as part of epidemic of going "No contact". They claim it's to save their mental health, and stand up to emotional abuse and narcissism - and they insist that there is no way that they could be influenced to make such drastic decisions simply because it's something that has skyrocketed in popularity on TikTok.

The hashtags of "Toxic Family" and "No Contact" have billions of views and likes on social media, and it's now driving people toward the therapists who are advising young adults who are questioning whether or not their childhood experiences constitute a reason to ghost their own parents.

As much as we want to believe that going to a therapist would be a way to guide them down the healthiest path in life - it seems as though some of the advice that these TikTok therapists are giving is a little bit concerning. The terms and definitions they use are vague, and they leave little room for *anyone* to be disqualified from having a reason to cut off their parents.

If you missed my last video on this topic - check it out here:
https://youtu.be/1qSqQDwFJig?si=abxFsvgRpFXrDmk8

Be sure to LIKE, COMMENT & SUBSCRIBE!

⬇️ Leave a comment!! ⬇️
⬇️ Hit SUBSCRIBE ⬇️

*********

Let's Connect!!

🟥 YOUTUBE: https://www.youtube.com/c/OutspokenSamantha
🟦 TWITTER:
https://twitter.com/Outspoken_Sam?t=rythUpd8c2yBqga-4YjWBg&s=09
🟪 TRUTH SOCIAL:
@OutspokenSamantha https://truthsocial.com/@OutspokenSamantha
⬛️ FACEBOOK:
https://www.facebook.com/OutspokenSamantha
🟧 INSTAGRAM:
https://www.instagram.com/outspokensamantha
🟥 GETTR: https://gettr.com/user/samanthakoch

COLLAB Email: outspokensam.tx@gmail.com

Other ways to support the channel:
Donate -
Venmo: @OutspokenSamantha
Paypal: @skochHD1

FAIR USE NOTICE
This video may contain copyrighted material; the use of which has not been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available for the purposes of criticism, comment, review and news reporting which constitute the fair use of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. Not withstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work for purposes such as criticism, comment, review and news reporting is not an infringement of copyright.

Loading 4 comments...